Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication
- 834 Downloads
This study aimed to replicate findings that demonstrated impact on students’ reading comprehension and social studies content learning. Using a randomized control trial, intervention, and outcome measures, this study was replicated in 85 8th-grade social studies classes with 19 teachers. Teachers were provided professional development on comprehension canopy, essential words, knowledge acquisition, and the use of team-based learning. Measures of reading comprehension administered at pre- and post-testing and measure of vocabulary and knowledge acquisition was administered at pre-, post-, and two follow-up times, 4 and eight weeks following treatment. On the measure of vocabulary and knowledge acquisition, students in the treatment condition outperformed those in the comparison condition at all time points. There were no statistically significant differences for reading comprehension.
KeywordsMiddle school Reading comprehension Social studies Content learning Replication
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305F100013 to The University of Texas at Austin as part of the Reading for Understanding Research Initiative. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.
- Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: a review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 68–84.Google Scholar
- Chiodo, J. J., & Byford, J. (2004). Do they really dislike social studies? A study of middle school and high school students. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
- Dunlosky, J. (2013). Strengthening the student toolbox: study strategies to boost learning. American Educator, 37, 12–21.Google Scholar
- Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rate reliability: how to estimate the level of agreement between two or multiple raters. Gaithersburg: STATAXIS Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L. G., & Hughes, K. E. (2006). Gates–MacGinitie reading test (4th ed.). Rolling Meadows: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables; user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2004). A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: Center of Multilevel Modeling.Google Scholar
- Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: an interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software on CD-ROM].Google Scholar
- Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., Haring, C., Ciullo, S., & McCulley, L. (2013). Intervention fidelity in special and general education research journals. The Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
- Swanson, E. A., Wanzek. J., McCulley, L. V., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Vaughn, S., Simmons, D., Fogarty, M., & Hairrell, A. (2014). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2014.910718.
- Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M., & Simmons, D. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2011). Procedures and standards handbook (21st ed.). Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.Google Scholar
- Yong, E. (2012). Replication studies: bad copy. Nature, 298–300. doi: 10.1038/485298a.