Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 95–114 | Cite as

School-Based Programs for Increasing Connectedness and Reducing Risk Behavior: A Systematic Review

  • Rebekah L. Chapman
  • Lisa Buckley
  • Mary Sheehan
  • Ian Shochet
Review Article

Abstract

School connectedness has a significant impact on adolescent outcomes, including reducing risk-taking behavior. This paper critically examines the literature on school-based programs targeting increased connectedness for reductions in risk taking. Fourteen articles describing seven different school-based programs were reviewed. Programs drew on a range of theories to increase school connectedness, and evaluations conducted for the majority of programs demonstrated positive changes in school connectedness, risk behavior, or a combination of the two. Many of the reviewed programs involved widespread school system change, however, which is frequently a complex and time-consuming task. Future research is needed to examine the extent of intervention complexity required to result in change. This review also showed a lack of consistency in the definitions and measurement of connectedness as well as few mediation analyses testing assumptions of impact on risk-taking behavior through increases in school connectedness. Additionally, this review revealed very limited evaluation of the elements of multicomponent programs that are most effective in increasing school connectedness and reducing adolescent risk taking.

Keywords

School connectedness Adolescent Risk taking Programs 

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2008). Injury among young Australians. Bulletin no. 66. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Battistich, V., & Hom, A. (1997). The relationship between students’ sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 87(12), 1997–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D., & Lewis, C. (2000). Effects of the Child Development Project on students’ drug use and other problem behaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21(1), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ “connectedness” to school and social adjustment during middle school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(3), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities. Educational Psychologist, 32(3), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bond, L., Butler, H., Thomas, L., Carlin, J., Glover, S., Bowes, G., et al. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 357.e359–357.e318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bond, L., Patton, G., Glover, S., Carlin, J., Butler, H., Thomas, L., et al. (2004). The Gatehouse Project: can a multilevel school intervention affect emotional wellbeing and health risk behaviours? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, E. C., Catalano, R. F., Fleming, C. B., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2005). Adolescent substance use outcomes in the Raising Healthy Children project: a two-part latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. (1996). The social development model: a theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: current theories (pp. 149–197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: findings from the Social Development Research Group. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Catalano, R. F., Mazza, J. J., Harachi, T. W., Abbott, R. D., Haggerty, K. P., & Fleming, C. B. (2003). Raising healthy children through enhancing social development in elementary school: results after 1.5 years. Journal of School Psychology, 41(2), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman, R. L., Buckley, L., Sheehan, M. C., Shochet, I. M., & Romaniuk, M. (2011). The impact of school connectedness on violent behavior, transport risk-taking behavior, and associated injuries in adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dornbusch, S., Erickson, K., Laird, J., & Wong, C. (2001). The relation of family and school attachment to adolescent deviance in diverse groups and communities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 396–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eggert, L., & Kumpfer, K. L. (1997). Drug abuse prevention for at-risk individuals. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  18. Fagan, A. A., Hanson, K., Hawkins, J. D., & Arthur, M. W. (2008). Bridging science to practice: achieving prevention program implementation fidelity in the Community Youth Development Study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fagan, A. A., & Mihalic, S. (2003). Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: lessons learned from the Blueprints for Violence Prevention replications of the Life Skills Training Program. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(3), 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flay, B. R., Allred, C. G., & Ordway, N. (2001). Effects of the Positive Action program on achievement and discipline: two matched-control comparisons. Prevention Science, 2(2), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furby, L., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1992). Risk-taking in adolescence: a decision-making perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkins, J., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153(3), 226–234.Google Scholar
  26. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Morrison, D. M., O’Donnell, J., Abbott, R. D., & Day, L. E. (1992). The Seattle Social Development Project: effects of the first four years on protective factors and problem behaviors. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 139–161). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  27. Hawkins, J. D., Guo, J., Hill, K. G., Battin-Pearson, S., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle Social Development intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science, 5(4), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins, J. D., Kosterman, R., Catalano, R., Hill, K. G., & Abbott, R. D. (2005). Promoting positive adult functioning through social development intervention in childhood. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 159, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Igra, V., & Irwin, C. E. (1996). Theories of adolescent risk-taking behaviour. In R. J. DiClemente, W. B. Hansen, & L. E. Ponton (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health risk behaviour (pp. 35–51). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  31. Irwin, C. E., Jr. (1990). The theoretical concept of at-risk adolescents. Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, 1, 1–14.Google Scholar
  32. Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.Google Scholar
  33. Li, K., Washburn, I., DuBois, D. L., Vuchinich, S., Ji, P., Brechling, V., et al. (2011). Effects of the Positive Action programme on problem behaviours in elementary school students: a matched-pair randomised control trial in Chicago. Psychology and Health, 26(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Libbey, H. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maddox, S., & Prinz, R. (2003). School bonding in children and adolescents: conceptualization, assessment, and associated variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: a causal modeling approach. American Sociological Review, 47(4), 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McLellan, L., Rissel, C., Donnelly, N., & Bauman, A. (1999). Health behaviour and the school environment in New South Wales, Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 611–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McNeely, C., Nonnemaker, J., & Blum, R. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health, 72(4), 138–146.Google Scholar
  40. Monahan, K., Oesterle, S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2010). Predictors and consequences of school connectedness: the case for prevention. The Prevention Researcher, 17(3), 3–6.Google Scholar
  41. Rimer, B., & Glanz, K. (2005). Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. NIH Publication No. 05-3896.Google Scholar
  42. O’Farrell, S. L., & Morrison, G. M. (2003). A factor analysis exploring school bonding and related constructs among upper elementary students. The California School Psychologist, 8, 53–72.Google Scholar
  43. Patton, G., Bond, L., Butler, H., & Glover, S. (2003). Changing schools, changing health? Design and implementation of the Gatehouse Project. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Resnick, M., Harris, L., & Blum, R. (1993). The impact of caring and connectedness on adolescent health and well-being. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 29(Suppl 1), S3–S9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shochet, I. M., Smyth, T., & Homel, R. (2007). The impact of parental attachment on adolescent perception of the school environment and school connectedness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 28(2), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simons-Morton, B., Haynie, D., Saylor, K., Davis Crump, A., & Chen, R. (2005). Impact analysis and mediation of outcomes: the Going Places program. Health Education & Behavior, 32, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Voisin, D., Salazar, L., Crosby, R., Diclemente, R., Yarber, W., & Staples-Horne, M. (2005). Teacher connectedness and health-related outcomes among detained adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 337.e317–337.e323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: the role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 202–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2007). Motivational interventions that work: themes and remaining issues. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wenzel, V., Weichold, K., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2009). The life skills program IPSY: positive influences on school bonding and prevention of substance misuse. Journal of Adolescence, 32(6), 1391–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: high-risk children from birth to adulthood. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Whitlock, J. (2004). Places to be and places to belong: youth connectedness in school and community. New York: ACT for Youth, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  55. Whitlock, J. (2006). Youth perceptions of life at school: contextual correlates of school connectedness in adolescence. Developmental Science, 10(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebekah L. Chapman
    • 1
  • Lisa Buckley
    • 1
  • Mary Sheehan
    • 1
  • Ian Shochet
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety—Queensland (CARRS-Q)Queensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology and CounselingQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations