Scientific Inquiry in Educational Multi-user Virtual Environments
- 451 Downloads
In this paper, we present a review of research into the problems of implementing authentic scientific inquiry curricula in schools and the emerging use of educational Multi-User Virtual Environments (MUVEs) to support interactive scientific inquiry practices. Our analysis of existing literature in this growing area of study reveals three recurrent themes: (1) with careful design and inclusion of virtual inquiry tools, MUVE-based curricula can successfully support real-world inquiry practices based on authentic interactivity with simulated worlds and tools, (2) Educational MUVEs can support inquiry that is equally compelling for girls and boys, and (3) research on student engagement in MUVE-based curricula is uneven. Based on these themes, we suggest that future large-scale research should investigate (1) the extent to which MUVE-based inquiry learning can be a viable substitute for the activities involved in real-world inquiry; (2) the impact of MUVEs on learning and engagement for currently underserved students, and (3) the impact on engagement and learning of individual aspects of MUVE environments, particularly virtual experimentation tools designed to scaffold student inquiry processes and maintain engagement. Additionally, we note that two identified issues with integrating scientific inquiry into the classroom are currently not addressed by MUVE research. We urge researchers to investigate whether (1) MUVE-based curriculum can help teachers meet state and national standards with inquiry curricula; and (2) scientific inquiry curricula embedded in MUVE environments can help teachers learn how to integrate interactive scientific inquiry into their classroom.
KeywordsScientific inquiry Multi-user virtual environment Engagement Self-efficacy
We would like to gratefully acknowledge the collaboration and contribution of the River City design and research team: Chris Dede, Jody Clarke and Catherine Bowman.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- American Association of University Women (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Annetta, L. & Park, J. C. (2006). Video games in science: A model for students and teachers creating 3D role playing games. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Barab, S., Arici, A., & Jackson, C. (2005a). Eat your vegetables and do your homework: A design based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educational Technology, 45(1), 15–20.Google Scholar
- Bers, M. U. (1999). Zora: A graphical multi-user environment to share stories about the self. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL'99).Google Scholar
- Bowers, A. (1987). Creative C.O.W. or a moo is worth a thousand words. Pointer, 32(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
- Brdicka, B. (1999). Multi user virtual environment and its possible use in education. Retrieved 9/28, 2003, from http://it.pedf.cuni.cz/∼bobr/MUVE/muveen.htm.
- Bruckman, A. (1996). Finding one’s own space in cyberspace. Technology Review, 99(1), 48–54.Google Scholar
- Bruckman, A. (2000). Uneven achievement in a constructivist learning environment. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Bruckman, A., Jensen, C., & DeBonte, A. (2002). Gender and programming achievement in a CSCL environment. Paper presented at the CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
- Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20–46). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
- Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2005). Making learning meaningful: An exploratory study of using multi-user environments (MUVEs) in middle school science. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Clarke, J., Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Nelson, B. (2006). A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology 46 (3), 27–36.Google Scholar
- Cobb, S., Neale, H., Crosier, J., & Wilson, J. R. (2002). Development and evalution of virtual learning environments. In K.M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Ruess, K. (2002). Motivation, usability, and learning outcomes in a prototype museum-based multi-user virtual environment. In P. Bell, R. Stevens & T. Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Nelson, B. (2004). Design-based research on gender, class, race, and ethnicity in a multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education (First free press paperback-1966 ed.): Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
- Dickey, M. D. (2000). 3D virtual worlds and learning: An analysis of the impact of design affordances and limitations in active worlds, blaxxun interactive, and onlive! Traveler: and a study of the implementation of active worlds for formal and informal education. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
- DuVall, R. (2001). Inquiry in science: From curiosity to understanding. Primary Voices K-6, 10, 3–9.Google Scholar
- Fanderclai, T. L. (1995). MUDs in education: New environments, new pedagogies. Computer Mediated Education Magazine, 2(1), 8.Google Scholar
- Falsetti, J. (1995). What the heck is a MOO? And what’s the story with all those cows? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (29th, Long Beach, CA, March 26-April 1, 1995).Google Scholar
- Foley, B. & Kobaissi, A. (2006). Using virtual chat to study in informal learning in online environments. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Galas, C. (2006). Why Whyville? Learning and Leading with Technology, 34(6), 30–33.Google Scholar
- Jorgnenson, O., & Vanosdall, R. (2002). The death of science? What we risk in the rush toward standardized tesing and the three R's. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 601–606.Google Scholar
- Ketelhut, D. J. (2006). Do students with higher self-efficacy exhibit greater and more diverse scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in “River City,” a multi-user virtual environment. Unpublished dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Ketelhut, D. J., Clarke, J., Dede, C., Nelson, B., & Bowman, C. (2005). Inquiry teaching for depth and coverage via multi-user virtual environments. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC) (2005). America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision. In M. L. H. Susan, R. Singer & H. A. Schweingruber (Ed.), Board on science education, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Science Teachers Association (2004). NSTA position statement: scientific inquiry. Draft. Retrieved August 9, 2004, from http://www.nsta.org/main/forum/showthread.php? t=1175.
- Nelson, B. (2005). Investigating the impact of individualized, reflective guidance on student learning in an educational multi-user virtual environment. Unpublished dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Nelson, B., & Ketelhut, D. J. (2006, October). Desiging for real-world inquiry in virtual environments. Paper presented at AECT 2006, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
- Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D. J., Clarke, J., Bowman, C., & Dede, C. (2005). Design-based research strategies for developing a scientific inquiry curriculum in a multi-user virtual environment. Educational Technology, 45(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
- Panel Urges Shift of Focus for School Science Courses (1995, December 7). New York Times.Google Scholar
- Roth, K. (1989). Science education: It’s not enough to ‘do’ or ‘relate.’ The American Educator, 13(4), 16–22, 46–48.Google Scholar
- Socially-Responsive Design Group (2004). Creating a socially-responsive play space for learning: Something for girls and boys. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (1998). Computer games for girls: What makes them play? In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 46–71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- The National Academies (2005). U.S. High school science lab experiences often poor, but research points way to improvements. Available: http://www4.nationalacademies.org/ news.nsf/isbn/0309096715? OpenDocument [2005, August].
- Tuzan, H. (2004). Motivating learners in educational computer games. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
- Urban Teacher Collaborative (2000). The urban teacher challenge: Teacher demand and supply in the great city schools. Available: http://www.cgcs.org/pdfs/utc.pdf [2005, August].
- Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (2002). Introduction to “laboratories.” In J. Wallace & W. Louden (Eds.), Dilemmas of science teaching (pp. 36–37). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Wright, J., & Wright, C. (1998). A commentary on the profound changes envisioned by the national science standards. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 122–143.Google Scholar