Genetic structuring of the moss Pseudoscleropodium purum sampled at different distances from a pollution source
- 154 Downloads
In this study, we used amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis to investigate the genetic structure of the terrestrial moss Pseudoscleropodium purum (Hedw.) M. Fleish. naturally exposed to different levels of atmospheric deposition of heavy metals. We also determined the heavy metal concentrations in samples of this moss to evaluate whether there was a relationship between atmospheric pollution and population genetic diversity. A low level of genetic diversity and a limited gene flow among populations were observed which is in accordance to the prevalence of asexual reproduction in this species. In addition, no significant correlation was found between metal content and gene diversity in P. purum, probably because of the common history of the sampled populations and/or to the lack of a drastic reduction of the size of the population; nonetheless, a clear genetic structure was evident in relation to the existing pollution gradient. Thus, based on the results of the principal coordinate analysis and Bayesian analysis of the genotypes, the mixed structure of the second most polluted population would suggest an ongoing differentiation of metal-tolerant genotypes in the most polluted sites of the sampling area.
KeywordsAFLP Genetic diversity Heavy metals Atmospheric deposition
The study was partly financed by the FEDER funding; M. T. Boquete is grateful to the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for a grant awarded within the Programa de Formación de Profesorado Universitario.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bargagli R (1998) Trace elements in terrestrial plants. An ecophysiological approach to biomonitoring and biorecovery. Bargagli R. (ed) Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany; New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brown DH, House KL (1978) Evidence of a copper-tolerant ecotype of the hepatic Solenostoma crenulatum. Ann Bot-London 42:383–1392Google Scholar
- Brown DH, Wells JM (1990) Physiological effects of heavy metals on the moss Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus. Ann Bot-London 66:641–647Google Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
- Folkeson L (1979) Changes in the cover of mosses and lichens in coniferous woodland polluted with copper and zinc. In: Hytteborn H (ed) The use of ecological variables in environmental monitoring, Proceedings of the First Nordic Oikos Conference, 1978, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 59–61Google Scholar
- Fritz S (2009) Vegetative reproduction and clonal diversity in pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophytina) of mesic habitats. A combined molecular and morpho-anatomical study in Pseudoscleropodium purum (Hedw.) M. Fleisch. ex Broth. (Brachytheciaceae), Pleurozium schreberi (Brid.) Mitt. (Hylocomiaceae) and Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus (Hedw.) Warnst. (Hylocomiaceae). Dissertation, Freien Universität, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hofman M (2007) The effect of genetic diversity on evolutionary potential. Local adaptation in the natterajck toad Bufo calamita in Sweden. Dissertation, Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Jensen J.L., Bohonak A.J., Kelley S.T. (2005) Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genetics 6: 13. V.3.23. http://ibdws.sdsu.edu/. Accessed 15 July 2015
- Longton RE, Schuster RM (1983) Reproductive biology. In: Schuster RM (ed) New manual of bryology, vol 1. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan, pp 386–462Google Scholar
- Nowak C (2008) Consequences of environmental pollution on genetic diversity in populations of the midge Chironomus riparius. Dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversitätGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds JB, Weir S, Cockerham CC (1983) Estimation of the co-ancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 105:767–779Google Scholar
- Shacklette HT (1967) Copper mosses as indicators of metal concentrations. Geol Surv Bull 1198:G1–G17Google Scholar
- Spagnuolo V, De Nicola F, Terracciano S, Bargagli R, Baldantoni D, Monaci F, Alfani A, Giordano S (2014) Persistent pollutants and the patchiness of urban green areas as drivers of genetic richness in the epiphytic moss Leptodon smithii. J Environ Sci 26:2493–2499. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tuba Z, Saxena DK, Srivastava K, Singh S, Czobel S, Kalaji HM (2010) Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements for validating the tolerant bryophytes for heavy metal (Pb) biomapping. Curr Sci India 98:1505–1508Google Scholar
- Ungherese G, Mengoni A, Somigli S, Baroni D, Focardi S, Ugolini A (2010) Relationship between heavy metals pollution and genetic diversity in Mediterranean populations of the sandhopper Talitrus saltator (Montagu) (Crustacea, Amphipoda). Environ Poll 158:1638–1643. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vekemans X (2002) AFLP-SURV version 1.0. Distributed by the author. Laboratoire de Génétique et Ecologie Végétale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. http://ebe.ulb.ac.be/ebe/AFLP-SURV.html. Accessed 16 April 2015.
- Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159Google Scholar