Impact of three phthalate esters on the sexual reproduction of the Monogonont rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus
- 322 Downloads
Phthalate esters are widespread contaminants that can cause endocrine disruption in vertebrates. Studies showed that molecules with hormonal activities in vertebrates and invertebrates can affect asexual and sexual reproduction in rotifers. We investigated the impact of di-hexylethyl phthalate (DEHP), di-butyl phthalate (DBP) and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP), on the asexual and sexual reproduction of the freshwater monogonont rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus in order to determine a potential environmental risk for sexual reproduction. We observed that DEHP has no significant impact on both asexual and sexual reproduction up to 2 mg/L. DBP has a positive effect on asexual reproduction at concentrations from 0.05 to 1 mg/L, but depresses it at 2 mg/L. Sexual reproduction is only affected at 2 mg/L and the impact observed is negative. BBP displayed a negative impact on both asexual and sexual reproduction at 1 and 2 mg/L. However we showed that the impacts of BBP on mixis and fertilization rates observed are due to the decrease in population growth rates at these concentrations and not to a direct impact of BBP on the mixis and the fertilization processes. Our results show that sexual reproduction in B. calyciflorus is not more sensitive than asexual reproduction to any of the substances tested which indicates the mode of action of these molecules is related to general toxicity and not to an interference with potential endocrine regulation of sexual reproduction. Comparison of effect concentrations and surface water contamination by phthalate esters suggests these compounds do not constitute a risk for primary consumers in these environments.
KeywordsEndocrine disruptors Brachionus calyciflorus Rofifera Sexual reproduction
The authors thank T.W.Snell for kindly providing the cysts. This research was supported by funds from Fond National de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S. - F.N.R.S.). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which helped to improve this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Andersen RA (ed) (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, London, p 578Google Scholar
- Bischoff HW, Bold HC (1963) Phycological studies. IV. Some soil algae from enchanted rock and related algal species, vol 6318. University of Texas Publications, Austin, pp 1–95Google Scholar
- Nogrady T, Wallace RL, Snell TW (1993) Rotifera, vol. 1: biology, ecology and systematics. SPB Academic Publishing, The HagueGoogle Scholar
- Ooms-Wilms AL, Postema G, Gulati RD (2001) population dynamics of rotifers in Lake Loosdrecht, the Netherlands, in relation to their potential food and predators. Freshw Biol 44(1):77–97Google Scholar
- OSPAR Commission (2006) OSPAR background document on phthalates. Available at http://www.ospar.org/documents?v=7028. Accessed 10 Dec 2015
- Planelló R, Herrero O, Martínez-Guitarte JL, Morcillo G (2011) Comparative effects of butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) on the aquatic larvae of Chironomus riparius based on gene expression assays related to the endocrine system, the stress response and ribosomes. Aquat Toxicol 105(1–2):62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Summary Risk Assessment Report on DEHP, European Commission (2008). Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Toxicology and Chemical Substance (TCS), European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra (VA) Italy. ISSN 1018–5593. http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/060d4981-4dfb-4e40-8c69-6320c9debb01
- Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment Part II (2003) in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances, Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Wallace RL, Snell TW (1991) Rotifera. In: Thorp J, Covich A (eds) Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, New York, pp 187–248Google Scholar
- Wuttke W, Jarry H, Seidlova-Wuttke D (2010) Definition, classification and mechanism of action of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Horm Int J Endocrinol Metab 9(1):9–15Google Scholar