Copper is acutely toxic to, and directly affects, primary producers and decomposers, which are key players in essential processes such as the nutrient cycle in freshwater ecosystems. Even though the indirect effects of metals (for example effects due to changes in species interactions) may be more common than direct effects, little is known about the indirect effects of copper on primary producers and decomposers. The effects of copper on phytoplankton, macrophytes, periphyton and organic matter decomposition in an outdoor lentic mesocosm facility were assessed, and links between the responses examined. Copper directly decreased macrophyte growth, subsurface organic matter decomposition, and the potential for high phytoplankton Chlorophyll a concentrations. However, periphyton cover and organic matter decomposition on the surface of the sediment were stimulated by the presence of copper. These latter responses were attributed to indirect effects, due to a reduction in grazing pressure from snails, particularly Physa acuta, in the higher copper-contaminated mesocosms. This permitted the growth of periphyton and other heterotrophs, ultimately increasing decomposition at the sediment surface. The present study demonstrates the pronounced influence indirect effects may have on ecological function, findings that may not be observed in traditional laboratory studies (which utilize single species or simplistic communities).
Ecosystem function Primary production Decomposition Metal-contamination Mesocosm Environmental assessment
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Construction of the mesocosms was funded by a Macquarie University Infrastructure Grant. Stephanie Gardham was supported by a Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship. Thanks to Manuel Nigel and Alexander Michie for their help in running the experiment. We also wish to thank the CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country flagship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Barranguet C, van den Ende FP, Rutgers M et al (2003) Copper-induced modifications of the trophic relations in riverine algal-bacterial biofilms. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1340–1349Google Scholar
Brinke M, Ristau K, Bergtold M et al (2011) Using meiofauna to assess pollutants in freshwater sediments: a microcosm study with cadmium. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:427–438. doi:10.1002/etc.387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briones MJ, Ineson P (1996) Decomposition of Eucalyptus leaves in litter mixtures. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1381–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canhoto C, Graca MAS (1996) Decomposition of Eucalyptus globulus leaves and three native leaf species (Alnus glutinosa, Castanea sativa and Quercus faginea) in a Portuguese low order stream. Hydrobiologia 333:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza R, Arge R, De Groot R et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daufresne T, Loreau M (2001) Ecological stoichiometry, primary producer-decomposer interactions, and ecosystem persistence. Ecology 82:3069–3082Google Scholar
Leland HV, Carter JL (1984) Effects of copper on species composition of periphyton in a Sierra Nevada, California, stream. Freshw Biol 14:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leland HV, Carter JL (1985) Effects of copper on production of periphyton, nitrogen fixation and processing of leaf litter in a Sierra Nevada, California, stream. Freshw Biol 15:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mal TK, Adorjan P, Corbett AL (2002) Effect of copper on growth of an aquatic macrophyte, Elodea canadensis. Ecology 120:307–311Google Scholar
Roussel H, Chauvet E, Bonzom J-M (2008) Alteration of leaf decomposition in copper-contaminated freshwater mesocosms. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:637–644. doi:10.1897/07-168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber U (1998) Chlorophyll fluorescence: new instruments for special applications. In: Garab G (ed) Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Effects, vol V. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 4253–4258Google Scholar
Serra A, Guasch H (2009) Effects of chronic copper exposure on fluvial systems: linking structural and physiological changes of fluvial biofilms with the in-stream copper retention. Sci Total Environ 407:5274–5282. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiegs SD, Langhans SD, Tockner K, Gessner MO (2007) Cotton strips as a leaf surrogate to measure decomposition in river floodplain habitats. J North Am Benthol Soc 26:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
Vajpayee P, Rai UN, Ali MB et al (2005) Possible involvement of oxidative stress in copper induced inhibition of nitrate reductase activity in Vallisneria spiralis L. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 74:745–754. doi:10.1007/s00128-005-0645-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang P, Wang C, Ouyang P et al (2011) Physiological responses of Vallisneria spiraslis L. induced by different hydraulic conditions when exposed to copper and nitrogen. Afr J Biotechnol 10:7441–7452. doi:10.5897/AJB11.784Google Scholar
Winner RW, Owen HA (1991) Seasonal variability in the sensitivity of freshwater phytoplankton communities to a chronic copper stress. Aquat Toxicol 19:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar