Reproductive and genotoxic effects in zebrafish after chronic exposure to methyl methanesulfonate in a multigeneration study
- 557 Downloads
There is still controversy whether adverse effects by genotoxic anthropogenic pollutants are linked to the decline of fish populations. Further investigations into the relationship between genotoxic stress and detrimental effects on development and reproduction in fish are required. For this end, zebrafish (F0 generation) were exposed in vivo to the alkylating model genotoxin methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) from fertilization to the age of 1 year. F0 fish were mated over 6 months to check for reproductive capacities. F1 fish grew up without exposure in order to allow for regeneration. Mortality of F0 fish depended on MMS concentrations. In MMS-exposed F0 fish, times of first spawning were delayed and fertility was reduced. Using the alkaline comet assay and the micronucleus test, significant genotoxic effects were found in the livers, gills and gonads of either sex in the F0 generation. No detrimental effects on growth were found. In F1 fish with parental exposure, teratogenic effects were increased, and larval survival was reduced. However, fertility capacities of the non-exposed F1 generation had recovered. Development and survival rates further recovered in the F2 generation. Anthropogenic genotoxicants may thus play a considerable role in the decline of wild fish populations.
KeywordsZebrafish Reproduction Genotoxicity Teratogenicity Multigeneration study
The authors thank Prof. Dr. Henner Hollert for co-supervision. For chemical analysis, the authors thank Prof. Dr. Heinfried Schöler and Dr. Sabine Studenroth from the Organic Environmental Chemistry section of the Institute of Earth Sciences at the University of Heidelberg. The first author is grateful to the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (DBU) for scholarship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bätscher R, Studer C, Fent K (1999) Stoffe mit endokriner Wirkung in der Umwelt. Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 308. EAWAG/BUWAL, BernGoogle Scholar
- Budavari S (ed) (1996) The Merck Index, vol 12. Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, p 1040Google Scholar
- Diekmann M, Hultsch V, Nagel R (1999) Wirkung von Benzo(a)pyren auf Fischpopulationen: Ergebnisse eines kompletten Life-Cycle-Tests mit dem Zebrabärbling Danio rerio. In: Oehlmann J, Markert B (eds) Ökotoxikologie—ökosystemare Ansätze und Methoden. Ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft, München, pp 197–203Google Scholar
- Fischnetz (2004) Schlussbericht. Trägerschaft des Projekts “Fischnetz”, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Friedl C (1999) Fischrückgang in schweizerischen Fliessgewässern. Swiss. Federal Office of Environment, Forests and. Landscape, BernGoogle Scholar
- Heeb M, Escher B (2007) Evaluation of the aquatic ecotoxicology of fullerenes and nanotubes. Termpaper, major in biogeochemistry and pollutant dynamics. Department of Environmental Science ETH Zürich, ZürichGoogle Scholar
- Hemsworth BN, Wardhaugh AA (1978) The induction of dominant lethal mutations in Tilapia mossambica by alkane sulphonic esters. Mutat Res 58(2–3):263–268Google Scholar
- Keiter S, Rastall A, Kosmehl T, Wurm K, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T, Hollert H (2006) Ecotoxicological assessment of sediment, suspended matter and water samples in the upper Danube River. A pilot study in search for the causes for the decline of fish catches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13(5):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munns WR, Black DE, Gleason TR, Salomon K, Bengtson D, Gutjahr-Gobell R (1997) Evaluation of the effects of dioxin and PCBs on Fundulus heteroclitus populations using a modelling approach. Environ Toxicol Chem 16(5):1074–1081Google Scholar
- Nagel R (2002) DarT: the embryo test with the zebrafish Danio rerio—a general model in ecotoxicology and toxicology. Altex 19(Suppl 1/02):38–48Google Scholar
- Nagel R, Isberner K (1998) Testing of chemicals with fish—a critical evaluation of tests with special regard to zebrafish. In: Braunbeck T, Hinton DE, Streit B (eds) Fish Ecotoxicology. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 338–352Google Scholar
- Schnurstein A, Braunbeck T (2001) Tail moment versus tail length—application of an in vitro version of the comet assay in biomonitoring for genotoxicity in native surface waters using primary hepatocytes and gill cells from zebrafish (Danio rerio). Ecotox Environ Saf 49(2):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Solomon FP, Faustman EM (1987) Developmental toxicity of four model alkylating agents on Japanese medaka fish (Oryzias latipes) embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 6(10):747–753Google Scholar
- van den Belt K, Wester PW, van der Ven LTM, Verheyen R, Witters H (2002) Effects of ethynylestradiol on the reproductive physiology in zebrafish (Danio rerio): time dependency and reversibility. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(4):767–775Google Scholar
- Van den Belt K, Verheyen R, Witters H (2003) Effects of 17α-ethynylestradiol in a partial life-cycle test with zebrafish (Danio rerio): effects on growth, gonads and female reproductive success. Sci Total Environ 309(1–3):127–137Google Scholar
- White PA, Robitaille S, Rasmussen JB (1999) Heritable reproductive effects of benzo[a]pyrene on the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 18(8):1843–1847Google Scholar