Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 268–279 | Cite as

Species-specific responsiveness of four enzymes to endosulfan and predation risk questions their usefulness as general biomarkers

  • Hendrik Trekels
  • Frank Van de Meutter
  • Lieven Bervoets
  • Robby Stoks
Article

Abstract

General biochemical biomarkers are widely used in current ecotoxicology and may function as early warning signals. We have, however, poor knowledge on how ecologically similar species differ in their biomarker responsiveness and how predation risk may affect these biomarkers, potentially in an interactive way with pesticides. We evaluated this by exposing four corixid water bug species to combinations of endosulfan and predation risk and quantifying the activity of four general enzymatic biomarkers: acetylcholinesterase (AChE), phenoloxidase (PO), catalase (CAT) and superoxidedismutase (SOD). AChE activity was inhibited at an endosulfan concentration of 2 μg l−1 and this did not differ significantly among species. Predation risk inhibited AChE activity with the same magnitude as endosulfan in one species, S. striata. Reduction in the investment of immune function following pesticide exposure, as measured by the activity of PO, was only observed in C. coleoptrata at 8 μg l−1 while we observed an increase of PO levels in S. striata. Overall, PO was suppressed under predation risk at 8 μg l−1 endosulfan. For SOD we observed a pesticide-induced increase across all species under predation risk, while for CAT the pesticide-induced increase was only present without predation risk. These results indicate that even within this group of ecologically similar and closely related species opposing biomarker responses may exist, as observed for PO. Effects of predation risk on all four enzymes, at a similar magnitude as the pesticide effects, further question their usefulness as general biomarkers.

Keywords

Endosulfan Enzymatic biomarkers Predation risk Synergism Water boatmen (Corixidae) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

During the study, HT was a PhD fellow of the Institute for the promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT Flanders) and FVDM a postdoctoral fellow of Research Foundation (FWO Flanders). This research was financially supported by research projects of the KULeuven Research Fund and FWO Flanders (project no. G018509N) to FVDM, LB and RS.

References

  1. Adams SM (2001) Biomarker/bioindicator response profiles of organisms can help differentiate between sources of anthropogenic stressors in aquatic ecosystems. Biomarkers 6:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams SM, Giesy JP, Tremblay LA, Eason CT (2001) The use of biomarkers in ecological risk assessment: recommendations from the Christchurch conference on biomarkers in ecotoxicology. Biomarkers 6:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida JR, Oliveira C, Gravato C, Guilhermino L (2010) Linking behavioural alterations with biomarkers responses in the European seabass Dicentrarchus labrax L. exposed to the organophosphate pesticide fenitrothion. Ecotoxicology 19:1369–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anholt BR, Werner E, Skelly DK (2000) Effect of food and predators on the activity of four larval ranid frogs. Ecology 81:3509–3521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballesteros ML, Durando PE, Nores ML, Díaz MP, Bistoni MA, Wunderlin DA (2009) Endosulfan induces changes in spontaneous swimming activity and acetylcholinesterase activity of Jenynsia multidentata (Anablepidae, Cyprinodontiformes). Environ Pollut 157:1573–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barry MJ, Logan DC (1998) The use of temporary microcosms for aquatic testing: direct and indirect effects of endosulfan on community structure. Aquat Toxicol 41:101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocquene G, Bellanger C, Cadiou Y, Galgani F (1995) Joint action of combinations of pollutants on the acetylcholinesterase activity of several marine species. Ecotoxicology 4:266–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer SK, Little EE, Delonay AJ, Beauvais SL, Jones SB, Ellersieck MR (2001) Behavioral dysfunctions correlate to altered physiology in rainbow trout (Oncorynchus mykiss) exposed to cholinesterase-inhibiting chemicals. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 40:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vie JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calabrese EJ (2008) Hormesis: why is it important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1451–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campero M, Ollevier F, Stoks R (2007a) Ecological relevance and sensitivity depending on the exposure time for two biomarkers. Environ Toxicol 22:572–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campero M, Slos S, Ollevier F, Stoks R (2007b) Sublethal pesticide concentrations and predation jointly shape life history: behavioral and physiological mechanisms. Ecol Appl 17:2111–2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campero M, De Block M, Ollevier F, Stoks R (2008) Correcting the short-term effect of food deprivation in a damselfly: mechanisms and costs. J Anim Ecol 77:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Candolin U (2005) Why do multiple traits determine mating success? Differential use in female choice and male composition in a water boatman. Proc R Soc B 272:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang C–C, Lee P–P, Liu CH, Cheng W (2006) Trichlorfon, an organophosphorus insecticide, depresses the immune response and resistance to Lactococcus garvieae of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish Shellfish Immun 20:574–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cindoruk SS (2011) Atmospheric organochlorine pesticide (OCP) levels in a metropolitan city in Turkey. Chemosphere 82:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Constantini D, Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2010) Ecological processes in a hormetic framework. Ecol Lett 13:1435–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cresswell JE, Merritt SZ, Martin MM (1992) The effect of dietary nicotine on the allocation of assimilated food to energy metabolism and growth in 4th-instar larvae of the southern armyworm, Spodoptera eridania (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Oecologia 89:449–453Google Scholar
  19. Damasio J, Navarro-Ortega A, Tauler R, Lacorte S, Barcelo D, Soares AMVM, Lopez MA, Riva MC, Barata C (2010) Identifying major pesticides affecting bivalve species exposed to agricultural pollution using multi-biomarker and multivariate methods. Ecotoxicology 19:1084–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Block M, Stoks R (2008a) Short-term larval food stress and associated compensatory growth reduce adult immune function in a damselfly. Ecol Entomol 33:796–801Google Scholar
  21. De Block M, Stoks R (2008b) Compensatory growth and oxidative stress in a damselfly. Proc R Soc B 275:781–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dutta HM, Arends DA (2003) Effects of endosulfan on brain acetylcholinesterase activity in juvenile bluegill sunfish. Environ Res 91:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres VJ, Featherstone RM (1961) A new rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem Pharmacol 7:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ernst WR, Jonah P, Doe K, Julien G, Hennigar P (1991) Toxicity to aquatic organisms of off-target deposition of endosulfan applied by aircraft. Environ Toxicol Chem 10:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP (2010) Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 88:698–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forbes VE, Palmqvist A, Bach L (2006) The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanazato T, Dodson SI (1992) Complex effects of a kairomones of Chaoborus and an insecticide on Daphnia pulex. J Plankton Res 14:1743–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanazato T, Dodson SI (1995) Synergistic effects of low oxygen concentration, predator kairomone, and a pesticide on the cladoceran Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 40:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang Q, Liu M, Feng J, Liu Y (2008) Effect of dietary benzoxadiazole on larval development, cuticle enzyme and antioxidant defense system in housefly (Musca domestica L.). Biochem Physiol 90:119–125Google Scholar
  30. Jemec A, Drobne D, Tišler T, Sepčić K (2010) Biochemical biomarkers in environmental studies—lessons learnt from enzymes catalase, glutathione S-transferase and cholinesterase in two crustacean species. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jin Y, Zhang X, Shu L, Chen L, Sun L, Qian H, Liu W, Fu Z (2010) Oxidative stress response and gene expression with atrazine exposure in adult female zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 78:846–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Korsloot A, van Gestel CAM, van Straalen NM (2004) Environmental stress and cellular response in arthropods. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumar S, Habib K, Fatma T (2008) Endosulfan induced biochemical changes in nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. Sci Total Environ 403:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar A, Doan H, Barnes M, Chapman JC, Kookana RS (2010) Response and recovery of acetylcholinesterase activity in freshwater shrimp, Paratya australiensis (Decapoda: Atyidae) exposed to selected anti-cholinesterase insecticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:1503–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laria Lamela RE, Quintana YC, Coffigny RS, Martinez M, Herrate NG (2008) Effects of formalin on total haemocytes count and histopathological changes in the shrimp Litopeneaus schmitti (Perez-Farfante and Kensley 1997). Aquac Res 39:1316–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Livingstone DR, Lemaire P, Matthews A, Peters LD, Porte C, Fitzpatrick PJ, Förlin L, Nasci C, Fossato V, Wootton N, Goldfarb P (1995) Assessment of the impact of organic pollutants on goby (Zosterisessor ophicephalus) and mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from Venice Lagoon Italy. Mar Environ Res 39:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Long ER, Buchman MF (1990) A comparative evaluation of selected measures of biological effects of exposure on marine organisms to toxic chemicals. In: McCarthy JF, Shugart LR (eds) Biomarkers of environmental contamination. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 355–394Google Scholar
  38. Lubick N (2010) Endosulfan’s exit: U.S. EPA pesticide review leads to a ban. Science 328:1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McPeek MA, Grace M, Richardson JML (2001) Physiological and behavioral responses to predators shape the growth/predation risk trade-off in damselflies. Ecology 82:1535–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moya-Larano J, Macias-Ordonez R, Blanckenhorn WU, Fernandez-Montraveta C (2008) Analysing body condition: mass, volume or density? J Anim Ecol 77:1099–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mugni H, Ronco A, Bonetto C (2011) Insecticide toxicity to Hyalella curvispina in runoff and stream water within a soybean farm (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mullin CA (1985) Detoxification enzyme relationships in arthropods of differing feeding strategies. In: PA Hedin (ed) Bioregulators for pest control, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 276, American Chemical Society, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Nappi AJ, Christensen BM (2005) Melanogenesis and associated cytotoxic reactions: applications to insect innate immunity. Insect Biochem Mol 35:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newman MC, Unger MA (2003) Fundamentals of ecotoxicology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  45. Peakall D (1992) Animal biomarkers as pollution indicators. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peakall DB (1994) The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (1). Introduction. Ecotoxicology 3:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pestana JLT, Loureiro S, Baird DJ, Soares AMVM (2009) Fear and loathing in the benthos: responses of aquatic insect larvae to the pesticide imidacloprid in the presence of chemical signals of predation risk. Aquat Toxicol 93:138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Printes LB, Callaghan A (2004) A comparative study on the relationship between acetylcholinesterase activity and acute toxicity in Daphnia magna exposed to anticholinesterase insecticides. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1241–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Relyea RA (2003) Predator cues and pesticides: a double dose of danger for amphibians. Ecol Appl 13:1515–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Relyea RA (2004) Synergistic impacts of malathion and predatory stress on six species of North American tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1080–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Relyea RA (2005) The lethal impacts of roundup and predatory stress on six species of North American tadpoles. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Relyea RA (2006) The effects of pesticides, pH, and predatory stress on amphibians under mesocosm conditions. Ecotoxicology 15:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Relyea R, Hoverman J (2006) Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: a review and synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecol Lett 9:1157–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Relyea RA, Mills N (2001) Predator-induced stress makes the pesticide carbaryl more deadlier to gray treefrog tadpoles (Hyla versicolor). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2491–2496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Savage AA (1989) Adults of the British aquatic Hemiptera Heteroptera: a key with ecological notes. Freshwater Biological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  56. Siva-Jothy MT, Moret Y, Rolff J (2005) Insect immunity: an evolutionary ecology perspective. Adv Insect Physiol 32:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slos S, Stoks R (2008) Predation risk induces stress proteins and reduces antioxidant defense. Funct Ecol 22:637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slos S, De Meester L, Stoks R (2009a) Food level and sex shape predator-induced physiological stress: immune defence and antioxidant defence. Oecologia 161:461–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slos S, De Block M, Stoks R (2009b) Autotomy reduces immune function and antioxidant defence. Biol Lett 5:90–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stenersen J (2004) Chemical pesticides: mode of action and toxicology. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stoks R (2001) Food stress an predator-induced stress shape developmental performance in a damselfly. Oecologia 127:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stoks R, McPeek MA (2003) Antipredator behavior and physiology determine Lestes species turnover along the pond-permanence gradient. Ecology 84:3327–3338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stoks R, De Block M, McPeek MA (2005a) Alternative growth and energy storage responses to mortality threats in damselflies. Ecol Lett 8:1307–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stoks R, De Block M, Van de Meutter F, Johansson F (2005b) Predation cost of rapid growth: behavioural coupling and physiological decoupling. J Anim Ecol 74:708–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stoks R, De Block M, Slos S, Van Doorslaer W, Rolff J (2006) Time constraints mediate predator-induced plasticity in immune function, condition, and life history. Ecology 87:809–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sugumaran H (2002) Comparative biochemistry of eumelanogenesis and the protective roles of phenoloxidase and melanin in insects. Pigment Cell Res 15:2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sumith JA, Parkpian P, Leadprathom N (2009) Dredging influenced sediment toxicity of endosulfan and lindane on black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fabricius) in Chantaburi river estuary in Thailand. J Sediment Res 24:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D’Antonio C, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trekels H, Van de Meutter F, Stoks R (2011) Effects of species-specific interactions with predation risk on the relative species sensitivities to a pesticide in water boatmen (Corixidae). Oikos 120:897–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tridico CP, Rodrigues ACF, Nogueira L, da Silva DC, Moreira AB, de Almeida EA (2010) Biochemical biomarkers in Oreochromis niloticus exposed to mixtures of benzo(a)pyrene and diazinon. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:858–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tu HT, Silvestre F, Scippo M-L, Thome J-P, Phuong NT, Kestemont P (2009) Acetylcholinesterase activity as a biomarker of exposure to antibiotics and pesticides in the black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72:1463–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Valavanidis A, Vlahogianni T, Dassenakis M, Scoullob M (2006) Molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress in aquatic organisms in relation to toxic environmental pollutants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 64:178–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker CH, Hopkins SP, Sibly RM, Peakall DB (2006) Principles of ecotoxicology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang C, Guanghua L, Cui J, Wang P (2009) Sublethal effects of pesticide mixtures on selected biomarkers of Carassius auratus. Environ Toxicol Phar 28:414–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber C (1993) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 4th edn. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  76. Winston GW (1991) Oxidants and antioxidants in aquatic animals. Comp Biochem Phys C 100:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wu G, Miyata T (2005) Susceptibilities to methamidophos and enzymatic characteristics in 18 species of pest insects and their natural enemies in crucifer vegetable crops. Pest Biochem Phys 82:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yeh S-P, Liu C-H, Sung T-G, Lee P–P, Cheng W (2006) Effect of saponin on hematological and immunological parameters of the giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture 261:1432–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hendrik Trekels
    • 1
  • Frank Van de Meutter
    • 1
  • Lieven Bervoets
    • 2
  • Robby Stoks
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Ecophysiology, Biochemistry and ToxicologyUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations