, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 1644–1658 | Cite as

Current concentrations and spatial and temporal trends in mercury in Great Lakes Herring Gull eggs, 1974–2009

  • D. V. Chip Weseloh
  • David J. Moore
  • Craig E. Hebert
  • Shane R. de Solla
  • Birgit M. Braune
  • Daryl J. McGoldrick


Current concentrations and spatial and temporal trends of total mercury (Hg) were assessed in eggs of the Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) over the period 1974–2009 at 15 sites in the Great Lakes: 2–3 sites per lake and one site in each of 3 connecting channels. Current (2009) concentrations ranged from 0.064 μg/g (wet weight) at Chantry Island (Lake Huron) to 0.246 μg/g at Middle Island (Lake Erie). There were significant inter-colony differences in mean Hg concentrations (2005–2009). Mercury concentrations at 14 of 15 sites declined from 23 to 86% between when it was first measured (usually 1974) and 2009. Declining temporal trends over the entire period (1974–2009) were significant at 10 of the 15 sites. On the other hand, there were no significant trends in mercury over the last 15 years. In the early years, declines of Hg in Herring Gull eggs tracked those in Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax) in most Great Lakes. More recently, declines in gull eggs were more evident than in smelt and may be partially explained by temporal changes in the gull diet. When gull Hg data were adjusted for temporal changes in the gull diet, as inferred from stable nitrogen isotope values in eggs, significant declines in egg mercury levels were found only at 4 of 15 sites. Overall, Hg concentrations have declined in Great Lakes Herring Gull eggs over the period 1974–2009 but changes in the gull diet may be contributing, in part, to those declines. Examination of contaminant temporal trends in multiple indicator species will ensure accurate inferences regarding contaminant availability in the environment.


Monitoring Great Lakes Herring Gull Mercury 



Many people have assisted with the collection of Herring Gull eggs over the years and their efforts are greatly appreciated: Michael Gilbertson, Glen Fox, Andy Gilman, Doug Hallett, Jim Learning, John Elliott, Stan Teeple, Pierre Mineau, John Ryder, Gary Shugart, John Struger, Christine Bishop, Karen Pettit, Rob Dobos, Glenn Barret, Cynthia Pekarik, Tania Havelka, Tammy Dobbie, Steve Elliott, Brian McCattie, Ralph Morris and his students, Jim Quinn and his students, Ray Faber and his students, Keith Grasman and his students, Lee Harper, Connie Adams, Susan Elbin, Liz Craig, Dave Best, Brian Ratcliff, Laird Shutt, Kim Williams, Doug Crump, Don Ryckman, Margie Koster, Larry Benner, Earl Walker, Peter Ross, Tyler Hoar, Dave Andrews, Kate (Jermyn) Gee and Pete Ewins. Routine chemical analyses were directed by Bryan Wakeford. Fish Contaminants Monitoring Program: Fish collections: Michael Keir, Mandi Clark and the Captain and crew of the C.C.G.S. Shark and Kelso. Sample processing and preparation: Mary Malecki and Karla Passow. Liane O’Keefe conducted the literature search.


  1. Akearok JA, Hebert CE, Braune BM, Mallory ML (2010) Inter- and intraclutch variation in mercury levels in eggs of three marine bird species nesting in the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ 408:836–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhavsar SP, Gewurtz SB, McGoldrick DJ, Keir MJ, Backus SM (2010) Changes in mercury levels in Great Lakes fish between 1970s and 2007. Environ Sci Technol 44:3273–3279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boening DW (2000) Ecological effects, transport and fate of mercury: a general review. Chemosphere 40:1335–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond AL, Diamond AW (2009) Total and methyl mercury concentrations in seabird feathers and eggs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braune BM (2007) Temporal trends of organochlorines and mercury in seabird eggs from the Canadian Arctic, 1975–2003. Environ Poll 148:599–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braune BM, Mallory ML, Gilchrist HG (2006) Elevated mercury levels in a declining population of ivory gulls in the Canadian Arctic. Mar Pollut Bull 52:969–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Solla SR, Weseloh DVC, Hebert CE, Pekarik C (2010) Impact of changes in analytical techniques for the measurement of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides on temporal trends in Herring Gull eggs. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1476–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Environment Canada (2008) NLET schedule of services. The National Laboratory for Environmental Testing. Water Science and Technology Directorate, Environment Canada Burlington, ON, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. Evers DC, Kaplan JD, Meyer MW, Reaman PS, Braselton WE, Major A, Burgess N, Scheuhammer A (1998) Geographic trend in mercury measured in Common Loon feathers and blood. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evers DC, Han Y-J, Driscoll CT, Kamman NC, Goodale MW, Lambert KF, Holsen TM, Chen CY, Clair TA, Butler T (2007) Biological mercury hotspots in the northeastern United States and southeastern Canada. Bioscience 57:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frederick P, Jayasence N (2011) Altered pairing behaviour and reproductive success in white ibises exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of methylmercury. Proc R Soc B 278:1851–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. French TD, Campbell LM, Jackson DA, Casselman JM, Scheider WA, Hayton A (2006) Long-term changes in legacy trace organic contaminants and mercury in Lake Ontario salmon in relation to source controls, trophodynamics, and climatic variability. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2794–2807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gewurtz SB, Bhavsar SP, Jackson DA, Fletcher R, Awad E, Moody R, Reiner EJ (2010) Temporal and spatial trends of organochlorines and mercury in fishes from the St. Clair River/Lake St. Clair corridor. Can J Great Lakes Res 36:100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goulet RR, Lalonde JD, Chapleau F, Findlay SC, Lean DR (2007) Temporal trends and spatial variability of mercury in four fish species in the Ontario segment of the St. Lawrence River, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:716–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hebert CE, Weseloh DV (2006) Adjusting for temporal change in trophic position results in reduced rates of contaminant decline. Environ Sci Technol 40:5624–5628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hebert CE, Norstrom RJ, Weseloh DV (1999a) A quarter century of environmental surveillance: the Canadian Wildlife Service’s Great Lakes Herring Gull Monitoring Program. Environ Rev 7:147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hebert CE, Shutt JL, Hobson KA, Weseloh DVC (1999b) Spatial and temporal differences in the diet of Great Lakes Herring Gulls (Larus argentatus): evidence from stable isotope analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebert CE, Arts MT, Weseloh DV (2006) Ecological tracers can quantify food web structure and change. Environ Sci Technol 40:5618–5623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hebert CE, Weseloh DVC, Idrissi A, Arts MT, O’Gorman R, Gorman OT, Locke B, Madenjian CP, Roseman EF (2008) Restoring piscivorous fish populations in the Laurentian Great Lakes causes seabird dietary change. Ecology 89:891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hebert CE, Weseloh DVC, Idrissi A, Arts MT, Roseman EF (2009) Diets of aquatic birds reflect changes in the Lake Huron ecosystem. Aquat Ecosys Health Manag 12:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hebert CE, Weseloh DVC, MacMillan S, Campbell D, Nordstrom W (2011) Metals and PAHs in colonial waterbird eggs from Lake Athabasca and the Peace-Athabasca Delta, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:1178–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heinz GH (1979) Methylmercury: reproductive and behavioural effects on three generations of mallard decks. J Wildl Manage 43:394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobson KA, Hughes KD, Ewins PJ (1997) Using stable-isotope analysis to identify endogenous and exogenous sources of nutrients in eggs of migratory birds: applications to Great Lakes contaminants research. Auk 114:467–478Google Scholar
  25. Hogan LS, Marschall E, Folt C, Stein RA (2007) How non-native species in Lake Erie influence trophic transfer of mercury and lead to top predators. J Great Lakes Res 33:46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. International Joint Commission United States and Canada (1988) Great Lakes water quality agreement. Amended by protocol signed November 18, 1987, Annex 2, Areas of Concern, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. Kemp ALW, Thomas RL (1976) Impact of man’s activities on the chemical composition in the sediments of Lakes Ontario, Erie and Huron. Water Air Soil Pollut 5:469–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim EY, Murakami T, Saeki K, Tatsukawa R (1996) Mercury levels and its chemical form in tissues and organs of seabirds. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 30:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koster MD, Ryckman DP, Weseloh DVC, Struger J (1996) Mercury levels in Great Lakes Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) eggs, 1972–1992. Environ Poll 93:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackay D, Toose L (2004) Quantifying the fate of mercury in the Great Lakes Basin: toward an ecosystem approach. Environ Res 95:298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marvin C, Painter S, Rossman R (2004) Spatial and temporal patterns in mercury contamination in sediments of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ Res 95:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGoldrick DJ, Clark MG, Keir MJ, Backus SM, Malecki MM (2010) Canada’s national aquatic biological specimen bank and database. J Great Lakes Res 36:393–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mineau P, Fox GA, Norstrom RJ, Weseloh DV, Hallett DJ, Ellenton JA (1984) Using the Herring Gull to monitor levels and effects of organochlorine contamination in the Canadian Great Lakes. In: Nriagu JO, Simmons MS (eds) Toxic contaminants in the Great Lakes. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 425–452, 80–92Google Scholar
  34. Monson BA (2009) Trend reversal of mercury concentrations in piscivorous fish from Minnesota lakes: 1982–2006. Environ Sci Technol 43:1750–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morel FMM, Kraepiel AML, Amyot M (1998) The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:543–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munthe J, Bodaly RAD, Branfireun BA, Driscoll CT, Gilmour CC, Harris R, Hotvat M, Lucotte M, Malm O (2007) Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries. Ambio 36:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Painter S, Marvin C, Rosa F, Reynoldson TB, Charlton MN, Fox M, Lina Thiessen PA, Estenik JF (2001) Sediment contamination in Lake Erie: a 25-year retrospective analysis. J Great Lakes Res 27:434–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paterson G, Whittle DM, Drouillard KG, Haffner GD (2009) Declining Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) energy density: are there too many salmonid predators in The Great Lakes? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:919–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pekarik C, Weseloh DVC (1998) Organochlorine contaminants in Herring Gull eggs from the Great Lakes, 1974–1995: change point regression analysis and short-term regression. Environ Monit Assess 53:77–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pirrone N, Allegrini I, Keeler GJ, Nriagu JO, Rossmann R, Robbins JA (1998) Historical atmospheric mercury emissions and depositions in North America compared to mercury accumulations in sedimentary records. Atmos Environ 32:929–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SAS Institute (2003) SAS for Windows. Version 9.1.3 (Service Pack 4). SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  43. Scheuhammer AM (1987) The chronic toxicity of aluminum, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review. Environ Poll 46:263–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheuhammer AM, Bond D (1991) Factors affecting the determination of total mercury in biological samples by continuous-flow cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Biol Trace Elem Res 31:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheuhammer AM, Perrault JA, Bond DE (2001) Mercury, methylmercury, and selenium concentrations in eggs of common loons (Gavia immer) from Canada. Environ Monit Assess 72:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scheuhammer AM, Meyer WM, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio 36:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spalding GM, Frederick PC, McGill HC, Bouton SN, Richey LJ, Schumacher IM, Blackmore CGM, Harrison J (2000) Histologic, neurologic, and immunologic effects of methylmercury in captive great egrets. J Wildl Dis 36:423–435Google Scholar
  48. StatSoft Inc (2005) STATISTICA data analysis software system, version 7.1. Tulsa, OKGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart TJ, Sprules WG, O’Gorman R (2009) Shifts in the diet of Lake Ontario alewife in response to ecosystem change. J Great Lakes Res 35:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stoewsand GS, Anderson JL, Gutenmann WH, Bache CA, Lisk DL (1971) Eggshell thinning in Japanese quail fed mercuric chloride. Science 173:1030–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomas RL (1972) The distribution of mercury in the sediments of Lake Ontario. Can J Earth Sci 9:636–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turle R, Collins B (1992) Validation of the use of pooled samples for monitoring of contaminants in wildlife. Chemosphere 25:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weis IM (2004) Mercury concentrations in fish from Canadian Great Lakes areas of concern: an analysis of data from the Canadian Department of the Environment database. Environ Res 95:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weseloh DVC, Pekarik C, de Solla SR (2006) Spatial patterns and rankings of contaminant concentrations in Herring Gull eggs from 15 sites in the Great Lakes and connecting channels, 1988–2002. Environ Monit Assess 113:265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolfe MF, Schwarzbach S, Sulaiman RA (1998) Effects of mercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wong IW, McNicol DK, Fong P, Fillman D, Neysmith J, Russell R (2003) The wildspace™ decision support system. Environ Model Softw 18:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yates DE, Mayack DT, Munney K, Evers DC, Major A, Kaur T, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury levels in mink (Mustela vision) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) from northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zillioux EJ, Porcella DB, Benoit JM (1993) Mercury cycling and effects in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:2245–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Chip Weseloh
    • 1
  • David J. Moore
    • 2
  • Craig E. Hebert
    • 3
  • Shane R. de Solla
    • 4
  • Birgit M. Braune
    • 3
  • Daryl J. McGoldrick
    • 5
  1. 1.Canadian Wildlife ServiceEnvironment CanadaTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Canadian Wildlife ServiceEnvironment Canada, Canada Centre for Inland WatersBurlingtonCanada
  3. 3.Wildlife and Landscape Science Directorate, National Wildlife Research CentreEnvironment Canada, Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Wildlife and Landscape Science DirectorateEnvironment Canada, Canada Centre for Inland WatersBurlingtonCanada
  5. 5.Water Science and Technology DirectorateEnvironment Canada, Canada Centre for Inland WatersBurlingtonCanada

Personalised recommendations