Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, 20:1914 | Cite as

A survey of environmental pollutants and cellular-stress markers of Porites astreoides at six sites in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands

  • Craig A. Downs
  • Cheryl M. Woodley
  • John E. Fauth
  • Sean Knutson
  • Martina Maria Burtscher
  • Lisa A. May
  • Athena R. Avadanei
  • Julie L. Higgins
  • Gary K. Ostrander
Article

Abstract

Coral communities along the coast of St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands have exhibited site-specific behavior in declines. In order to determine if these specific coral communities are stressed and whether a pollutant or environmental factor present at this site is a probable stressor, we surveyed six near-shore coral communities in St. John, USVI for environmental pollutants and to determine the cellular physiological condition of the coral, Porites astreoides. The six sites within St. John are Cruz Bay, Caneel Bay, Hawksnest Bay, Trunk Bay, Tektite Reef in Beehive Bay, and Red Point. Red Point was considered the reference site because of its abundance and diversity of species, and it was the furthest removed from down-stream and down-current anthropogenic activities. All sites showed distinct cellular-stress marker patterns, indicating that the physiological condition of each population was different. Populations at Cruz, Hawksnest, Trunk, and Tektite were stressed, as indicated by high levels of DNA lesions and expression of stress proteins. Hawksnest and Tektite were contaminated with polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), while Cruz was contaminated with semi-volatile organochlorines and nitrogen-based biocides. At least for Hawksnest and Tektite, stress-marker patterns were consistent with an exposure to PAHs. Fecal coliform levels were high in Cruz and Trunk, indicating fecal contamination, as well as consideration for management action. Results from this study serve as a justification for a more thorough and methodical investigation into the stressors responsible for declines of coral populations within St. John. Furthermore, this study supports the argument for the importance of local factors contributing to regional coral reef declines; that not all forces impacting coral are global.

Keywords

Cellular stress Coral Environmental pollutants Stress-markers 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Rafe Boulon, Caroline Rogers, Jeff Miller, Tony Spitzack, Colette Diede of 6-Paq SCUBA, and Caneel Bay Resort. We would also like to thank Dr. Sylvia Galloway for editing and formatting assistance.

NOAA Disclaimer

This publication does not constitute an endorsement of any commercial product or intend to be an opinion beyond scientific or other results obtained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). No reference shall be made to NOAA, or this publication furnished by NOAA, to any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NOAA recommends or endorses any proprietary product mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an interest to cause the advertised product to be used or purchased because of this publication.

References

  1. American Public Health Association (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Au KG, Clark S, Miller JH, Modrich P (1989) Escherichia coli mutY gene encodes an adenine glycosylase active on G/A mispairs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8877–8881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nystrom M (2004) Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature 429:827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boehm PD, Douglas GS, Loreti CP (1995a) Managing the NRDA process: challenges in establishing causation and injury. In: Unknown (ed) Proceedings for the toxic substances in water environments: assessment and control, water environment federation, Washington, pp 7–20Google Scholar
  5. Boehm PD, Galvani PB, O’ Donnell PJ (1995b) Scientific and legal conundrums in establishing injury and damages: the natural resource damage assessment regulations. In: Stewart RB (ed) Natural resource damages: a legal economic and policy analysis. The National Legal Center for the Public Interest, Washington, pp 31–60Google Scholar
  6. Carbery K, Owen R, Frickers T, Otero E, Readman J (2006) Contamination of Caribbean coastal waters by the antifouling herbicide Irgarol 1051. Mar Pollut Bull 52:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter KE et al (2008) One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science 321:560–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr S, Nipper M (2003) Porewater toxicity testing: biological, chemical and ecological considerations. SETAC Press, PensacolaGoogle Scholar
  9. Coelho VR, Manfrino C (2007) Coral community decline at a remote Caribbean island: marine no-take reserves are not enough. Aqua Conserv Mar Fresh Ecosys 17:666–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cormier SM (2006) Ecoepidemiology: a means to safeguard ecosystem services that sustain human welfare. In: Arapis G, Goncharova N, Baveye P (eds) Ecotoxicology, ecological risk assessment and multiple stressors. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cormier S, Suter G (2008) A framework for fully integrating environmental assessment. Environ Manage 42:543–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowther JR (2001) The ELISA guidebook. Humana, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  13. Downs CA (2005) Cellular diagnostics and its application to aquatic and marine toxicology. In: Ostrander GK (ed) Techniques in aquatic toxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 181–207Google Scholar
  14. Downs CA, Shigenaka G, Fauth JE, Robinson CE, Huang A (2002) Cellular physiological assessment of bivalves after chronic exposure to spilled Exxon Valdez crude oil using a novel molecular diagnostic biotechnology. Environ Sci Technol 36:2987–2993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downs CA, Mueller E, Phillips S, Fauth JE, Woodley CM (2005a) Cellular diagnostics and coral health: declining coral health in the Florida Keys. Mar Pollut Bull 51:558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downs CA, Woodley CM, Richmond RH, Lanning LL, Owen R (2005b) Shifting the paradigm of coral-reef ‘health’ assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 51:486–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downs CA, Fauth JE, Wetzel D, Hallock P, Halas JF, Halas JC, Curry R, Woodley CM (2006a) Investigating coral reef degradation at Alina’s Reef in the Florida Keys: cellular physiology of white grunt (Haemulon plumieri) as a biological indicator. Environ Forensics 7:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Downs CA, Richmond RH, Mendiola WJ, Rougee L, Ostrander GK (2006b) Cellular physiological effects of the MV Kyowa Violet fuel-oil spill on the hard coral, Porites lobata. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:3171–3180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edmunds PJ (2002) Long term dynamics of shallow coral reefs in St. John, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 21:357–367Google Scholar
  20. Ellis RJ (1996) Stress proteins as molecular chaperones. In: Van Eden W, Young DB (eds) Stress proteins in medicine. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  21. Feder ME, Hofmann GE (1999) Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol 61:243–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fucci L, Oliver CN, Coon MJ, Stadtman ER (1983) Inactivation of key metabolic enzymes by mixed-function oxidation reactions: possible implication in protein turnover and ageing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:1521–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner TA, Cote IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR (2003) Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science 301:958–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gauch H (1985) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Geldreich EE, Clark HF, Huff CB, Best LC (1965) Fecal-coliform-organism medium for the membrane filter technique. J Am Water Works Assoc 57:208–214Google Scholar
  26. Ghosh S, Gepstein S, Heikkila JJ, Dumbroff EB (1988) Use of a scanning densitometer or an ELISA plate reader for measurement of nanogram amounts of protein in crude extracts from biological tissues. Anal Biochem 169:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golbuu Y, Fabricius K, Victor S, Richmond R (2008) Gradients in coral reef communities exposed to muddy river discharges in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guengerich FP (2004) Cytochrome P450: what have we learned and what are the future issues? Drug Met Rev 36:158–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harborne AR, Mumby PJ, Micheli F, Perry CT, Dahlgren CP, Holmes KE, Brumbaugh DR (2006) The functional value of Caribbean coral reef, seagrass and mangrove habitats to ecosystem processes. Adv Mar Biol 50:57–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hartl FU (1996) Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 381:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heckathorn SA, Downs CA, Coleman JS (1999) Small heat shock proteins protect electron transport in chloroplasts and mitochondria during stress. Am Zool 39:865–876Google Scholar
  32. Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S (1977) Use of nucleopore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228Google Scholar
  33. International Standard, ISO 7899-1 (2000) Water quality—Detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria–part 1: Membrane filtration method. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. Jameson SC, Tupper MH, Ridley JM (2002) The three screen doors: can marine “protected” areas be effective? Mar Pollut Bull 44:1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) Worldwide occurrence and effects of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Int 30:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kow YW (1994) Base excision repair in E. coli—an overview. Ann NY Acad Sci 726:178–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kow YW, Faundez G, Melamede RJ, Wallace SS (1991) Processing of model single-strand breaks in phi X-174 RF transfecting DNA by Escherichia coli. Radiation Res 126:357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marks GS (1985) Exposure to toxic agents: The heme biosynthetic pathway and hemoproteins as indicator. Crit Rev Toxicol 15:151–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muller E, Rogers C, Spitzack A, Van Woesik R (2008) Bleaching increases likelihood of disease on Acropora palmata (Lamarck) in Hawksnest Bay, St John, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 27:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Norberg-King TJ, Ausley LW, Burton DT, Goodfellow WL, Miller JL, Waller WT (2005) Toxicity reduction and toxicity identification evaluations for effluents, ambient waters and other aqueous media (TIE). SETAC, PensacolaGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers C (2008) Coral bleaching and disease should not be underestimated as causes of Caribbean coral reef decline. Proc Biol Sci 276:197–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers CS, Miller J (2006) Permanent ‘phase shifts’ or reversible declines in coral cover? Lack of recovery of two coral reefs in St. John, US Virgin Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 306:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sies H (1999) Glutathione and its role in cellular functions. Free Radic Biol Med 27:916–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith TB, Nemeth RS, Blondeau J, Calnan JM, Kadison E, Herzlieb S (2008) Assessing coral reef health across onshore to offshore stress gradients in the US Virgin Islands. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1983–1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stocker R, Ames BN (1987) Potential role of conjugated bilirubin and copper in the metabolism of lipid peroxides in bile. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:8130–8134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Szuromi P (2003) Coral reefs under siege. Science (Washington) 301:891Google Scholar
  47. Thunell S (2000) Porphyrins, porphyrin metabolism and porphyries. I. Update. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 60:509–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turgeon DD, Asch RG, Causey BD, Dodge RE, Jaap W, Banks K et al (2002) The state of coral reef ecosystems of the United States and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2002. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Ocean Service/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  49. US EPA (2002) Chromocult® and Readycult® Coliforms 100. Federal Register 40CFR Part141, sec. 141.21, 29 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  50. US EPA Method 3620b (1996) Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods, SW-846, 3rd edn. Proposed update II. USEPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  51. USVI (2001) 2000 Water quality assessment for the United States Virgin Islands. http://www.dpnr.gov.vi/dep/pubs/305b2000.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2011
  52. Wagle RJ (2007) Understanding a watershed from the biological viewpoint. J Am Water Res Assoc 7:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Whelan KR, Miller TJ, Sanchez O, Patterson M (2007) Impact of the 2005 coral bleaching event on Porites porites and Colpophyllia natans at Tektite Reef, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 26:689–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA)  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig A. Downs
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cheryl M. Woodley
    • 3
  • John E. Fauth
    • 4
  • Sean Knutson
    • 5
  • Martina Maria Burtscher
    • 6
  • Lisa A. May
    • 7
  • Athena R. Avadanei
    • 7
  • Julie L. Higgins
    • 7
  • Gary K. Ostrander
    • 5
  1. 1.Haereticus Environmental LaboratoryCliffordUSA
  2. 2.Office of Public Health Studies, John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of Hawaii, ManoaHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.U.S. National Oceanic & Atmospheric AdministrationNOS CCEHBR Hollings Marine LaboratoryCharlestonUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  5. 5.Pacific Biosciences Research CenterUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  6. 6.Environmental Research Institute, North Highland CollegeUHI Millennium InstituteThursoScotland, UK
  7. 7.JHT Inc. Contractor at National Oceanic & Atmospheric AdministrationNOS CCEHBR Hollings Marine LaboratoryCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations