Occurrence and distribution of steroids, hormones and selected pharmaceuticals in South Florida coastal environments
- 642 Downloads
The common occurrence of human derived contaminants like pharmaceuticals, steroids and hormones in surface waters has raised the awareness of the role played by the release of treated or untreated sewage in the water quality along sensitive coastal ecosystems. South Florida is home of many important protected environments ranging from wetlands to coral reefs which are in close proximity to large metropolitan cities. Because, large portions of South Florida and most of the Florida Keys population are not served by modern sewage treatment plants and rely heavily on the use of septic systems, a comprehensive survey of selected human waste contamination markers was conducted in three areas to assess water quality with respect to non-traditional micro-constituents. This study documents the occurrence and distribution of fifteen hormones and steroids and five commonly detected pharmaceuticals in surface water samples collected from different near shore environments along South Florida between 2004 and 2006. The compounds most frequently detected were: cholesterol, caffeine, estrone, DEET, coprostanol, biphenol-A, β-estradiol, and triclosan. The concentration detected for estrone and β-estradiol were up to 5.2 and 1.8 ng/L, respectively. Concentrations of caffeine (5.5–68 ng/L) and DEET (4.8–49 ng/L) were generally higher and more prevalent than were the steroids. Distribution of microconstituents was site specific likely reflecting a diversity of sources. In addition to chemical analysis, the yeast estrogen screen assay was used to screen the samples for estrogen equivalency. Overall, the results show that water collected from inland canals and restricted circulation water bodies adjacent to heavily populated areas had high concentrations of multiple steroids, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products while open bay waters were largely devoid of the target analytes.
KeywordsPharmaceuticals Hormones Wastewater Coastal waters Florida
This research was partially funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) through a grant to K. Willett (NIUST grant NA16RU1496). Recombinant yeast were kindly provided by Dr John Sumpter (Brunel University, UK). This publication is SERC contribution 412.
- Atkinson S, Atkinson MJ, Tarrant AM (2003) Estrogens from sewage in coastal marine environments. Environ Health Perspect 111:531–535Google Scholar
- Blair S, Kemp S (2004) Miami River basin water quality improvement report: action item matrix quarterly progress report. Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM), Miami-Dade CountyGoogle Scholar
- Cecchine G, Golomb BA, Hilborne LH, Spektor DM, Anthony CR (2000) A review of the scientific literature as it pertains to Gulf War illnesses, vol. 8: pesticides. National Defense Research Institute, RANDGoogle Scholar
- Johnson AC, Aerni HR, Gerritsen A, Gibert AM, Giger W, Hylland K, Jürgens M, Nakari T, Pickering A, Suter MJF (2005) Comparing steroid estrogen, and nonylphenol content across a range of European sewage plants with different treatment and management practices. Water Res 39:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leff LG, Dana JR, Mcarthur JV, Shimkets LJ (1993) Detection of Tn-5 like sequences in Kanamycin resistant stream bacteria and environmental DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:417–421Google Scholar
- Matsui S, Takigami H, Taniguchi N, Adachi J, Kawami H, Shimizu Y (2000) Estrogen and estrogen mimics contamination in water and the role of sewage treatment. Water Sci Technol 42:173–179Google Scholar
- Örn S, Holbech H, Madsen TH, Norrgren L, Petersen G (2003) Gonad development and Vittellogenin production in Zebra fish exposed to Ethynylestradiol and Methyltestosterone. Aquat Toxicol 65:397–411Google Scholar
- Singh S (2006) Assessing the sources, quantities, and trends on human waste contamination along protected South Florida ecosystem: a chemical tracer based study. PhD Dissertation, Florida International University, Miami, Florida. QD0.S56 2006Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau (2008) State & County QuickFacts, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/12000.html
- Water Reuse Foundation (2009) A reconnaissance-level quantitative comparison of reclaimed water, surface, water, and groundwater. Report 02-008-01. Water Reuse Foundation, Alexandria Virginia, 141 pp. ISBN 978-1-934183-12-0Google Scholar