, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 558–564 | Cite as

An automated marine biomonitoring system for assessing water quality in real-time

  • Sérgio Reis Cunha
  • Renata Gonçalves
  • Sérgio Rui Silva
  • Ana Dulce Correia


On-line behavioural monitoring systems are nowadays a common tool in ecotoxicological research. Although applied successfully to freshwater species, they are rarely used in the marine field. Here we present first results about the Marine On-line Biomonitor System (MOBS), a new automatic system for recording behavioural responses of marine and freshwater species. Low power electrical signals are modulated by the behavioural activities of the organisms and then monitored, processed and analysed in real-time. We applied this system to two marine fish species, seabream (Sparus aurata) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), and studied their behavioural responses at an acute hypoxic test condition (2 mg O2 l−1). The tests were performed for 15 min in small test chambers with isolated fish as well as in large aquaria with groups of six fish. In both cases, MOBS recorded significant alterations in their behaviour: isolated juvenile seabream increased their ventilation frequency (VF) in average by 20%, and grouped fish decreased their swimming activities by 40%. In contrast, isolated juvenile turbot responded to hypoxia with a 36% lower VF. The consequences for data interpretation based on tests for individual fish or groups of fish are discussed.


Biomonitor Seawater Behaviour Seabream Turbot Hypoxia 



We are thankful to Hugo Santos for his assistance in the maintenance of the fish in the laboratory. This research was sponsored by the project POCI /MAR/56964/2004, co-financed by FEDER through Programa Operational Ciência e Inovação 2010.


  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2003) Standard guide for ventilation behavioural toxicology testing of freshwater fish. E 1768–95 (reapproved 2003). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Water and Environmental Technology, vol 11.05, American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bégout ML, Lagardère JP (1995) An acoustic telemetry study of seabream (Sparus aurata, L.)—first results on activity rhythm, effects of environmental variables and space utilization. Hydrobiologia 300/301:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Correia AD, Gonçalves R, Scholze M, Ferreira M, Reis-Henriques MA (2007) Biochemical and behavioural responses in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) to phenantrene. J Exp Mar Ecol 347:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig S, Laming P (2004) Behaviour of the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteous aculeatus (Gasterosteidae, Teleostei) in the multispecies freshwater biomonitor: a validation of automated recordings at three levels of ammonia pollution. Water Res 38:2144–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fdil MA, Mouabad A, Outzourhit A, Benhra A, Maarouf A, Pihan JC (2006) Valve movement response of the mussel Mytillus galloprovincialis to metals (Cu, Hg, Cd and Zn) and phosphate industry effluents from Maroccan Atlantic coast. Ecotoxicology 15:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kane AS, Salierno JD, Gipson GT, Molteno TCA, Hunter C (2004) A video-based movement analysis system to quantify behavioural stress responses of fish. Water Res 38:3993–4001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kröger S, Law RJ (2005) Biosensors for marine applications. We all need the sea, but does the sea need biosensors? Biosens Bioelectron 20:1903–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Magalhães DP, Cunha RA, Santos JAA, Buss DF, Baptista DF (2007) Behavioural response of zebrafish Danio rerio (Hamilton 1822) to sublethal stress by sodium hypoclorite: ecotoxicological assay using an image analysis biomonitoring system. Ecotoxicology 16:417–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. MathWorks (2002) Matlab language of technical computing version 6.5. Natick. MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. van der Schalie WH, Dickson KL, Westlake GF, Cairns J Jr (1979) Fish bioassay monitoring of waste effluents. Environ Manag 3:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van der Schalie WH, Sheed TR, Knechtgnes PL, Widder MW (2001) Using higher organisms in biological early warning systems for real-time toxicity detection. Biosens Bioelectron 16:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Welty JC (1934) Experiments in group behaviour of fishes. Physiol Zool 7:85–128Google Scholar
  13. Wu RSS (2002) Hypoxia: from molecular responses to ecosystem responses. Mar Pollut Bull 45:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sérgio Reis Cunha
    • 1
    • 2
  • Renata Gonçalves
    • 1
  • Sérgio Rui Silva
    • 2
  • Ana Dulce Correia
    • 3
  1. 1.CIMAR-Centre for Marine and Environmental ResearchEnvironmental Toxicology LaboratoryPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringPorto UniversityPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations