, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 197–203 | Cite as

The water flea Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Cladocera) as a test species for screening and evaluation of chemicals with endocrine disrupting effects on crustaceans

  • Norihisa Tatarazako
  • Shigeto Oda


The water flea Daphnia magna (Crustacea, Cladocera) is a cyclical parthenogen, which can reproduce both by parthenogenesis and by sexual reproduction. With its ease of handling in the laboratory, several testing methods using D. magna exist for regulatory toxicity testing. Recently, several studies revealed that one of the major hormone groups in insects and crustaceans, juvenile hormones, are involved in the shift of reproductive mode from parthenogenesis to sexual reproduction (production of male neonates). Using offspring sex ratio as a new endpoint has made it possible to identify chemicals with juvenile hormone-like effects on crustaceans. The testing method using D. magna, in which offspring sex ratio is incorporated as a new endpoint, is now being proposed to the OECD as an enhanced version of the existing OECD Test Guideline 211: Daphnia magna reproduction test. No other clear-cut endpoint for identifying juvenile-hormone disrupting effects has ever been found in crustaceans than the induction of male neonates production in cladocerans. In this regard, it is expected that testing methods using D. magna are suitable for screening and risk assessment of chemicals with juvenile-hormone disrupting effects.


Insect growth regulators Juvenile hormones Offspring sex ratio OECD Test Guideline 211 


  1. ASTM (1988) Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests with fishes, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians. E729-88a. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 20 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM (2004) Standard guide for conducting Daphnia magna life-cycle toxicity tests. E 1693–97 (reapproved 2004). American Society for Testing and Materials, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin WS, Bailey R, Long KE, Klaine S (2001) Incomplete ecdysis is an indicator of ecdysteroid exposure in Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:1564–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodson SI, Hanazato T (1995) Commentary on effects of anthropogenic and natural organic chemicals on development, swimming behavior, and reproduction of Daphnia, a key member of aquatic ecosystems. Environ Health Perspect 103(Suppl 4):7–11Google Scholar
  5. Environment Canada (1992) Test of reproduction and survival using the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia dubia. Report EPS 1/RM/21 FebGoogle Scholar
  6. Hebert PDN (1987) Genotypic characteristics of cyclic parthenogens and their obligately asexual derivatives. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhauser Verlag AG, Basel, 403 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Hobaek A, Larsson P (1990) Sex determination in Daphnia magna. Ecology 71:2255–2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutchinson TH, Pounds NA, Hampel M, Williams T (1999) Life-cycle studies with marine copepods (Tisbe battagliai) exposed to 20-hydroxyecdysone and diethylstilbestrol. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2914–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleiven OT, Larsson P, Hobaek A (1992) Sexual reproduction in Daphnia magna requires three stimuli. Oikos 65:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kusk OK, Wollenberger L (2006) Towards an internationally harmonised test method for reproductive and developmental effects of endocrine disrupters in marine copepods. Ecotoxicology, DOI: 10.1007/s10646-006-0112-2Google Scholar
  11. LeBlanc GA (2006) Crustacean endocrine toxicology: a review. Ecotoxicology, DOI: 10.1007/s10646-006-0115-zGoogle Scholar
  12. Ministry of the Environment in Japan (2004) Endocrine disrupting effects of substances. Accessed on January 25, 2006Google Scholar
  13. Mu X, LeBlanc GA (2002a) Environmental antiecdysteroids alter embryo development in the crustacean Daphnia magna. J Exp Zool 292:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mu X, LeBlanc GA (2002b) Developmental toxicity of testosterone in the crustacean Daphnia magna involves anti-ecdysteroidal activity. Gen Comp Endocrinol 129:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Institute of Technology and Evaluation in Japan (2004) The amended chemical substances control law. Accessed on January 25, 2006Google Scholar
  16. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2005a) Production of male neonates in four cladoceran species exposed to a juvenile hormone analog, fenoxycarb. Chemosphere 60:74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2005b) Production of male neonates in Daphnia magna (Cladocera, Crustacea) exposed to juvenile hormones and their analogs. Chemosphere 61:1168–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oda S, Tatarazako N, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2006) Genetic differences in the production of male neonates in Daphnia magna exposed to juvenile hormone analogs. Chemosphere 63:1477–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (1984) Daphnia sp. acute immobilisation test and reproduction test. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, 202. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. OECD (1998) Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, 211. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Olmstead AW, LeBlanc GA (2002) Juvenoid hormone methyl farnesoate is a sex determinant in the crustacean Daphnia magna. J Exp Zool 293:736–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Olmstead AW, LeBlanc GA (2003) Insecticidal juvenile hormone analogs stimulate the production of male offspring in the crustacean Daphnia magna. Environ Health Perspect 111:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seki M, Yokota H, Maeda M, Tadokoro H, Kobayashi K (2003) Effects of 4-nonylphenol and 4-tert-octylphenol on sex differentiation and vitellogenin induction in medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1507–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sohoni P, Tyler CR, Hurd K, Caunter J, Hetheridge M, Williams T, Woods C, Evans M, Toy R, Gargas M, Sumpter JP (2001) Reproductive effects of long-term exposure to bisphenol A in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Sci Technol 15:2917–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tabata A, Miyamoto N, Ohnishi Y, Itoh M, Yamada T, Kamei T, Magara Y (2003) The effect of chlorination of estrogenic chemicals on the level of serum vitellogenin of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Water Sci Technol 47:51–57Google Scholar
  26. Tatarazako N, Oda S, Watanabe H, Morita M, Iguchi T (2003) Juvenile hormone agonists affect the occurrence of male Daphnia. Chemosphere 53:827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tatarazako N, Oda S, Abe R, Morita M, Iguchi T (2004) Development of a screening method for endocrine disruptors in crustaceans using Daphnia magna (Cladocera, Crustacea). Environ Sci 17:439–449 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  28. USEPA (2002) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 4th ed. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington. EPA-821-R-02-013Google Scholar
  29. Verslycke T, Ghekiere A, Raimondo S, Janssen CR (2006) Mysid crustaceans as standard models for the screening and testing of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Ecotoxicology, DOI: 10.1007/s10646-006-0122-0Google Scholar
  30. Yokota H, Seki M, Oshima Y, Tadokoro H, Honjo T, Kobayashi K (2001) Life-cycle toxicity of 4-nonylphenol to medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2552–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations