Economic Change and Restructuring

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 193–220 | Cite as

Re-examining the saving-investment nexus: threshold cointegration and causality evidence from the ECOWAS

  • Loesse Jacques Esso


The aim of this paper is to re-examine the relationship between saving and investment in the case of ECOWAS countries. We then employ the Gregory and Hansen (J Econometr 70:99–126, 1996a; Oxford Bull Econ Stat 58:555–560, 1996b) threshold cointegration tests and the Toda and Yamamoto (J Econometr 66:225–250, 1995) causality procedure. Threshold cointegration approach allows estimating changes in the saving-retention coefficients over time. Using yearly data for the period from 1960 to 2007, we show out two groups of countries regarding the cointegration test results. In the first group (The Gambia and Togo), capital is perfectly mobile since there is no long-run relationship between savings and investment. The second group comprised of the ten other ECOWAS countries studied, is characterized by an incomplete capital mobility. Moreover, in the second group the saving-retention coefficient is time-varying in most of the ECOWAS countries (except for Benin and Niger) and is different from a country to another one. The changes in the saving-retention coefficients indicate how international capital mobility has changed. Moreover, the inclusion of trade openness and country size in the saving-investment equation reduces the saving retention coefficients implying improvement of capital mobility over time. Furthermore, investment rates cause saving rates in Benin, Guinea-Bissau and Niger while saving rates cause investment rates in Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria and Sierra Leone.


Investment Saving Unit root Threshold cointegration Causality ECOWAS 

JEL Classification

C32 E21 


  1. Adedeji OS, Thornton J (2007) Saving, investment and capital mobility in African countries. J Afr Econ 16:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. African Development Bank (2008) Selected statistics on African countries. African Development Bank, XXVIIGoogle Scholar
  3. AmirKhalkhali S, Dar A (2007) Trade openness and saving-investment correlations. Econ Modell 24:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrade P, Bruneau C, Gregoir S (2005) Testing for the cointegration rank when some cointegrating directions are changing. J Econometr 124:269–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews DWK (1993) Test for parameter stability and structure change with unknown change points. Econometrica 61:821–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Apergis N, Tsoumas C (2009) A survey of the Feldstein Horioka puzzle: what has been done and where we stand. Res Econ 63:64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bagnai A (2006) Structural breaks and the twin deficits hypothesis. Int Econ Econ Policy 3:137–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Chakrabarti A (2005) Openness, size, and the saving-investment relationship. Econ Syst 29:283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balke NS, Fomby TB (1997) Threshold cointegration. Int Econ Rev 38:627–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bangake C, Eggoh JC (2011) The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle in African countries: a panel cointegration analysis. Econ Modell 28:939–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baxter M, Crucini MJ (1993) Explaining saving-investment correlations. Am Econ Rev 83:416–436Google Scholar
  12. Bencivenga VR, Smith B (1991) Financial intermediation and endogenous growth. Rev Econ Stud 58:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2002) Current account deficits in the Euro area: the end of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle?. Brook Pap Econ Activity 2:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caprio GA Jr, Howard DH (1984) Domestic saving, current accounts, and international capital mobility. International Finance Discussion Paper no 244. Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Chakrabarti A (2006) The saving-investment relationship revisited: new evidence from multivariate heterogeneous panel cointegration analyses. J Comparat Econ 34:402–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christiano LJ (1992) Searching for breaks in GNP. J Bus Econ Stat 10:237–250Google Scholar
  17. Coakley J, Kulasi F (1997) Cointegration of long span saving and investment. Econ Lett 54:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coakley J, Kulasi F, Smith R (1996) Current account solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Econ J 106:620–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demirgüc-Kunt A, Maksimovic V (1998) Law, finance and firm growth. J Finance 53:2107–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431Google Scholar
  21. Dorosh PA, Sahn DE (2003) A general equilibrium analysis of the effect of macroeconomic adjustment on poverty in Africa. J Policy Model 22:753–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Enders W, Falk B (1998) Threshold-autoregressive, median-unbiased, and cointegration tests of purchasing power parity. Int J Forecast 14:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Enders W, Granger CWF (1998) Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates. J Bus Econ Stat 16:304–311Google Scholar
  24. Enders W, Siklos PL (2001) Cointegration and threshold adjustment. J Bus Econ Stat 19:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eslamloueyan K, Jafari M (2010) Capital mobility, openness, and saving-investment relationship in Asia. Econ Modell 27:1246–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans P, Kim B-H, Oh K-Y (2008) Capital mobility in saving and investment: a time-varying coefficients approach. J Int Money Finance 27:806–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fattouh B (2005) Capital mobility and sustainability: evidence from U.S current account data. Empiric Econ 30:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feldstein M (1983) Domestic saving and international capital movements in the long run and the short run. Eur Econ Rev 21:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldstein M, Horioka C (1980) Domestic saving and international capital flows. Econ J 90:314–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fosu AK, Kimenyi MS, Ndung’u NS (2003). Economic reforms and restructuring in Sub-Saharan Africa: an overview. J Afr Econ 12:ii1–ii11Google Scholar
  32. Fourquau J, Hurlin C, Rabaud I (2008) The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: a panel smooth transition regression approach. Econ Modell 25:284–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Georgopoulos GJ, Hejazi W (2005) Feldstein-Horioka meets a time trend. Econ Lett 86:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldsmith RR (1969) Financial structure and development. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  35. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996a) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econometr 70:99–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996b) Tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 58:555–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gregory AW, Nason JM, Watt D (1994) Testing for structural breaks in cointegrated relationships. J Econometr 71:321–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gurley JG, Shaw ES (1955) Financial aspects of economic development. Am Econ Rev 45:515–538Google Scholar
  39. Guzel A, Ozdemir ZA (2011) The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle in the presence of structural shifts: the case of Japan versus the USA Research. Int Bus Finance 25:195–202Google Scholar
  40. Hansen BE (1992) Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. J Bus Econ Stat 10:321–335Google Scholar
  41. Hansen BE, Seo B (2002) Testing for two-regime threshold cointegration in vector error-correction models. J Econometr 110:293–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hericourt J, Maurel M (2005) The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited: An european-regional perspective. William Davidson Institute Working Paper, no 763Google Scholar
  43. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim SH (2001) The saving-investment correlation puzzle is still a puzzle. J Int Money Finance 20:1017–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kim S, Kim SH, Wang Y (2007) Saving, investment and international capital mobility. Jpn World Econ 19:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim D, Perron P (2009) Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. J Econometr 148:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kollias C, Mylonidis N, Paleologou S-M (2008) The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle across EU members: evidence from ARDL bounds approach and panel data. Int Rev Econ Finance 17:380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28Google Scholar
  50. Lau E, Baharumshah AZ (2003) Sustainability of external imbalances: the case of Malaysia. Singapore Econ Rev 48:61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levine R, Loayza N, Beck T (2000) Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. J Monetary Econ 46:31–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lo M, Zivot E (2001) Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment to the law of one price. Macroecon Dyn 5:533–576Google Scholar
  53. Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mamingi N (1997) Savings-investment correlations and capital mobility: the experience of developing countries. J Policy Model 19:609–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McKinnon RI (1973) Money and capital in economic development. Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller S (1988) Are saving and investment cointegrated?. Econ Lett 27:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murphy RG (1984) Capital mobility and the relationship between saving and investment in OECD countries. J Int Money Finance 3:327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Murphy RG (1986) Productivity shocks, non-traded goods and optimal capital accumulation. Eur Econ Rev 30:1081–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nell KS, Santos LD (2008) The Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis versus the long-run solvency constraint model: a critical assessment. Econ Lett 98:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Obstfeld M (1995) International capital mobility in the 90s. In: Kenen PB (ed) Understanding Interdependence: the Macroeconomics of the open economy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  61. Obstfeld M, Taylor AM (1997) Nonlinear aspects of goods market arbitrage and adjustment: Heckscher’s commodity points revisited. J Jpn Int Econ 11:441–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Oh K, Kim B, Kim H, Ahn B (1999) Savings-investment cointegration in panel data. Appl Econ Lett 6:477–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Payne JE (2005) Saving-investment dynamics in Mexico. J Policy Model 27:525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Payne JE, Kumazawa R (2005) Capital mobility, foreign aid, and openness: further panel data evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. J Econ Finance 29:122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Perron P (1990) Testing for a unit root in a time series with a changing mean. J Bus Econ Stat 8:153–162Google Scholar
  67. Phillips PCB, Ouliaris S (1990) Asymptotic properties of residual based tests of cointegration. Econometrica 58:165–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Phillips PCB, Toda HY (1993) Limit theory in cointegrated vector autoregressions. Econometr Theory 9:150–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rebelo ST (1991) Long run policy analysis and long run economic growth. J Polit Econ 99:500–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reinhart CM, Tokatlidis I (2003) Financial liberalisation: the African experience. J Afr Econ 12:ii53–ii88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robinson J (1952) The rate of interest and other essays. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roubini N (1988) Current account and budget deficits in an intertemporal model of consumption and taxation smoothing: a solution to the ‘Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle’? Unpublished Manuscript, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  74. Sachsida A, Caetano A (2000) The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited. Econ Lett 68:85–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Summers LH (1988) Tax policy and international competitiveness. In: Frankel J (ed) International aspects of fiscal policies. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  76. Taylor AM (2001) Potential pitfalls for the purchasing-power-parity puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price. Econometrica 69:473–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Telatar E, Telatar F, Bolatoglu N (2007) A regime switching approach to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: evidence from some European countries. J Policy Model 29:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econometr 66:225–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wong D (1990) What do saving-investment relationships tell us about capital mobility?. J Int Money Finance 9:60–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. World Bank (2008) 2008 World development indicators. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wu JL (1998) Are budget deficits ‘Too Large’?: the evidence from Taiwan. J Asian Econ 9:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yamada H (1998) A note on the causality between export and productivity: an empirical re-examination. Econ Lett 61:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CES, Université Paris 1—Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance
  2. 2.Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Statistique et d’Economie Appliquée (ENSEA)Abidjan 08Côte d’Ivoire
  3. 3.Cellule d’Analyse de Politiques Economiques du CIRES (CAPEC)Abidjan 08Côte d’Ivoire

Personalised recommendations