Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 369–379 | Cite as

Preparing Undergraduate Pre-service Teachers Through Direct and Video-Based Performance Feedback and Tiered Supports in Early Head Start



Video-based peer coaching and tiered supports were used to promote pre-service teachers’ developmentally appropriate adult–child interactions during a semester-long learning module focusing on education, care, and early intervention for infants and toddlers. Undergraduate majors (n = 19) in their second year of an early childhood teacher education program were enrolled in a field-based birth-to-three experience. The module under study took place during one of eight semesters of guided field based apprenticeship, with classroom teachers and early childhood faculty providing constant direct supervision and field-based instruction. Faculty collaborated with Early Head Start teachers to implement a system of tiered supports including universal, targeted, and intensive strategies and interventions derived from principles of multitiered systems of support; video-based peer coaching served as a support at each level of this framework. The field-based module took place in Early Head Start classrooms, where candidates were assessed weekly on developmentally appropriate practice using the CLASS (LaParo et al. in Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) manual, toddler. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, 2012). Peer coaching groups provided weekly feedback on uploaded video clips of student-led classroom activities. These supports positively influenced undergraduates’ interaction behaviors; interviews revealed dimensions of their personal and professional growth. Implications for teacher preparation and further research are discussed.


Teacher preparation Multi-tiered systems of support RTI Infant and toddler teachers Video-based peer coaching Pre-service teachers Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) 



This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) under a grant in Personnel Preparation in EI/ECSE (#H325K120172).


  1. Adams, S. K., & Wolf, K. (2008). Strengthening the preparation of early childhood teacher candidates through performance-based assessments. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(1), 6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American association of colleges for teacher education. (2004). The early childhood challenge: Preparing high-quality teachers for a changing society. Retrieved January 3, 2015 from http://www.aacte.org.
  3. American association of colleges of teacher education (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. Retrieved January 3, 2015 from http://www.aacte.org.
  4. Ammentorp, L., & Madden, L. (2014). Partnered placements: Creating and supporting successful collaboration among preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, R. S., & Milner, J. O. (2006). Complexities of collaboration: Intensity of mentors’ responses to paired and single student teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, C. P., & Feger, B. (2010). Examining the challenges early childhood teacher candidates face in figuring their roles as early educators. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31(4), 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullough, J. R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., Cecil, C. D., Winston, E. M., Erickson, L., et al. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 19(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Certo, J. L. (2006). Beginning teacher concerns in an accountability-based testing environment. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(4), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherrintgon, S., & Loveridge, J. (2014). Using video to promote early childhood teachers’ thinking and reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clifford, J. R., Macy, M. G., Albi, L. D., Bricker, D. D., & Rahn, N. L. (2005). A model of clinical supervision for preservice professionals in early intervention and early childhood special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 25(3), 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children (DEC), National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), & National Head Start Association (NHSA). (2013). Frameworks for response to intervention in early childhood: Description and implications. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from http://www.dec-sped.org.
  13. Division of Early Childhood (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices.
  14. Early, D. M., & Winton, P. J. (2001). Preparing the workforce: Early childhood teacher preparation at 2- and 4-year institutions of higher education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(3), 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M. L., Joseph, G., & Strain, P. (2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58(4), 48–52.Google Scholar
  16. Freedman, S. W., & Appleman, D. (2009). “In it for the long haul”—How teacher education can contribute to teacher retention in high-poverty, urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukkink, R., & Tavecchio, L. (2010). Effects of video interaction guidance on early childhood teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1652–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardiner, W., & Robinson, K. S. (2011). Peer field placements with preservice teachers: Negotiating the challenges of professional collaboration. Professional Educator, 35(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
  19. Greenwood, C. R., Bradfield, T., Kaminski, R., Linas, M., Carta, J. J., & Nylander, D. (2011). The Response to Intervention (RTI) approach in early childhood. Focus on Exceptional Children, 43(9), 1–22.Google Scholar
  20. Heineke, A., Kennedy, A. S., & Lees, A. (2013). Preparing early childhood professionals for the culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms and communities of Illinois. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 15(2). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v15n2/heineke.htm.
  21. Joseph, G. E., & Brennan, C. (2013). Framing quality: Annotate video-based portfolios of classroom practice by pre-service teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 423–430. doi: 10.1007/s10643-013-0576-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy, A., & Heineke, A. (2014). Re-envisioning the role of universities in early childhood teacher preparation: Partnerships for 21st century learning. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education., 35, 226–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennedy, A. S., & Lees, A. (2014). Merging professional preparation and development through blended practices and a tiered approach in Early Head Start. In K. Pretti-Frontczak, J. Grisham-Brown, & L. Sullivan (Eds.), Young exceptional children monograph 16—Blending practices to strengthen quality early learning programs for all children. Los Angeles, CA: Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  24. Kennedy, A. S., & Lees, A. (2015). Outcomes of a community-based birth-to-three preparation sequence for undergraduate early childhood teacher candidates. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(6), 770–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. LaParo, K., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2012a). Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) manual, toddler. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  26. LaParo, K., Thomason, A., Maynard, C., & Scott-Little, C. (2012b). Developing teachers’ classroom interactions: A description of a video review process for early childhood education students. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33, 224–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim, C. I., & Able-Boone, H. (2005). Diversity competencies within early childhood teacher preparation: Innovative practices and future directions. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26(3), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald, M., Tyson, K., Brayko, K., Bowman, M., Delport, J., & Shimomura, F. (2011). Innovation and impact in teacher education: Community-based organizations as field placements for preservice teachers. Teachers College Record, 113(8), 1668–1700.Google Scholar
  29. Moyles, J., Adams, S., & Musgove, A. (2002). Using reflective dialogues as a tool for engaging with challenges of defining effective pedagogy. Early Childhood Development and Care, 172(5), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murrell, P. C., Jr. (2000). Community teachers: A conceptual framework for preparing exemplary urban teachers. Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Myers, D. M., Simonsen, B., & Sugai, G. (2011). Increasing teachers’ use of praise with a response-to-intervention approach. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(1), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Association for the Education of Young Children (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved February 21, 2015 from http://www.naeyc.org.
  33. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center [NECTAC]. (2012). Response to Intervention in Early Childhood. Retrieved from http://nectac.org/topics/RTI/RTI.asp.
  34. Office of Head Start. (2013). Improving teacher-child interactions: Using the CLASS in Head Start preschool programs. Retrieved on October 23, 2014 from http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov.
  35. Ostrowski, M., Mouzourou, C., Danner, N., & Zaghlawan, H. (2012). Improving teacher practices using microteaching: Planful video recording and constructive feedback. Young Exceptional Children, 16(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rust, F. (2010). Shaping new models for teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(2), 5–18.Google Scholar
  37. Ryan, A. M., Ensminger, D., Heineke, A. J., Kennedy, A. S., Prasse, D., & Smetana, L. (2014). Teaching, learning, and leading with schools and communities: One urban university re-envisions teacher preparation for the next generation. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(2), 139–154.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, J. (2004). Developing paired teaching placements. Educational Action Research, 12(1), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winton, P. J. (2010). Professional development and quality initiatives: Two essential components of an early childhood system. In P. W. Wesley & V. Buysse (Eds.), The quest for quality: Promising innovations for early childhood programs. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, E., & Bennett, N. (2000). Changing theories, changing practice: Exploring early childhood teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 81–99.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Early Childhood Special Education, School of EducationLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Early Childhood Education, Woodring College of EducationWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations