Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 447–457 | Cite as

Reflections in the Mirror of Reggio Emilia’s Soul: John Dewey’s Foundational Influence on Pedagogy in the Italian Educational Project

  • Gai Lindsay


This paper articulates John Dewey’s socio-political and historical influence upon the foundation and evolution of the world-renowned Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. It proposes that the pedagogical depth, influence and endurance of the Italian project are grounded in Dewey’s philosophies of education, aesthetics and democracy. An analysis of scholarly and original sources outlines the socio-political climate in post World War II Italy, the work undertaken by several progressive Italian educators and the Italian translations of Dewey’s work during this period to reveal new insights about Dewey’s enduring influence on the pedagogical values which underpin the Reggio Emilia educational approach. In so doing, it acknowledges the direct Deweyan influence on the work of Italian reformers Borghi, Codignola, Malaguzzi and Ciari and on the developing Reggio Emilia project. This revelation of Dewey’s progressive values as interpreted by educators in Reggio Emilia offers inspiration to educators in contemporary early childhood contexts, to researchers and to students of the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education.


Dewey Reggio Emilia Malaguzzi Ciari Early childhood education Italy 


  1. Allemann-Ghionda, C. (2000). Dewey in postwar-Italy: The case of re-education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 19(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boydston, J. (1969). John Dewey: A checklist of translations 1900–1967. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burza, V. (2009). Dewey in the Italian elementary school. In L. Hickman & G. Spadafora (Eds.), John Dewey’s educational philosophy in international perspective: A new democracy for the twenty-first century (pp. 132–142). Carbondale: Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  4. Cadwell, L. (2003). Bringing learning to life: The Reggio approach to early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Catarsi, E. (2011). Family education and childhood services in Tuscany. XIII Congresso Internazionale, 17–22. Retrieved from,
  6. Ciari, B. (1961). Le nuove tecniche didattiche. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  7. Ciari, B. (1973). La grande disadattata. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
  8. Collett, P. (2010). Editorial: Art and early childhood education. Australian Art Education, 33(2), 6–9.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, M. (2012). Is beauty a way of knowing? In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio emilia experience in transformation (pp. 295–302). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath and Co., Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1919). The psychology of drawing; Imagination and expression; Culture and industry in education. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1939). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.Google Scholar
  16. Dodd-Nufrio, A. T. (2011). Reggio Emilia, Maria Montessori, and John Dewey: Dispelling teachers’ misconceptions and understanding theoretical foundations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 235–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworkin, M. (1959). Dewey on education: Selections. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dykhuizen, G. (1973). The life and mind of John Dewey. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dýrfjörð, K. (2006). The pedagogy of Reggio Emilia: Developmentally appropriate practice through the looking glass of Dewey’s democracy. In A. Ross (Ed.), Citizenship education: Europe and the world (pp. 291–302). London: CiCe.Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, C. (1995). Democratic participation in a community of learners: Loris Malaguzzi’s Philosophy of Education as Relationship. Faculty Publications, Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, Paper 15. Retrieved from,
  21. Edwards, C. (2002). Three approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. Faculty Publications, Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, Paper 2. Retrieved from,
  22. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (2012). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed.). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  23. Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Faini Saab, J., & Stack, S. F. (2013). John Dewey and Reggio Emilia: Using the arts to build a learning community. In L. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Learning across the early childhood curriculum. Advances in Early Education and Day Care (Vol. 17, pp. 115–133). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  25. Fielding, M., & Moss, P. (2011). Radical education and the common school: A democratic alternative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gandini, L. (2011). Play and the hundred languages of children: An interview with Lella Gandini. The Strong, 4(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  27. Gandini, L. (2012). History, ideas, and basic principles: An interview with Loris Malaguzzi. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed., pp. 27–71). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  28. Gardner, H. (2012). Foreword. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach in transformation (pp. xiii–xvi). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  29. Garrison, J. (1996). A Deweyan theory of democratic listening. Educational Theory, 46(4), 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghirardi, M. (2002). Our school as part of the Reggio Emilia experience: From 1971 to today. In M. Ghirardi & A. Mucchi (Eds.), Along the levee road (pp. 27–49). Reggio Emilia: Reggio Children.Google Scholar
  31. Giamminuti, S. (2013). Dancing with Reggio Emilia: Metaphors for quality. Mt Victoria, NSW: Pademelon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Griebling, S. (2011). Discoveries from a Reggio-inspired classroom: Meeting developmental needs through the visual arts. Art Education (March), pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
  33. Hall, K., Horgan, M., Ridgway, A., Murphy, R., Cunneen, M., & Cunningham, D. (2010). Loris Malaguzzi and the Reggio Emilia experience. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  34. Hawkins, D. (2012). Malaguzzi’s story, other stories, and respect for children. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia experience in transformation (3rd ed., pp. 73–80). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  35. Hendrick, J. (Ed.). (1997). First steps towards teaching the Reggio Way. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Hewett, V. M. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hickman, L., Neubert, S., & Reich, K. (2009). John Dewey: Between pragmatism and constructivism. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hildebrand, D. (2008). Dewey: A beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Hohr, H. (2013). The concept of experience by John Dewey revisited: Conceiving, feeling and “Enliving”. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoyuelos, A. (2013). The Ethics in Loris Malaguzzi’s Philosophy (Pisano, R., Trans.). Reykjavik: Isalda ehf.Google Scholar
  41. Jäggi, M., Müller, R., & Schmid, S. (1977). Red Bologna, translated from the German, Das Rote Bologna (1976). London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooerative.Google Scholar
  42. Kliebard, H. M. (2006). Dewey’s reconstruction of the curriculum: From occupation to disciplined knowledge. In D. Hansen (Ed.), John Dewey and our educational prospect: A critical engagement with Dewey’s Democracy and education (pp. 113–126). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lazzari, A. (2011). Reconceptualising professional development in early childhood education: A study on teacher’s professionalism carried out in Bologna province [Dissertation Thesis]. Dottorato di Ricerca in Pedagogica, Università di Bologna, Bologna. Retrieved from,
  44. Lazzari, A. (2012). The Public Good. Historical and Political Roots of Municipal Preschools in Emilia Romagna. European Journal of Education, 47(4), 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lazzari, A., & Balduzzi, L. (2013). Bruno Ciari and ‘educational continuity’: The relationship from an Italian perspective. In G. Dahlberg & P. Moss (Eds.), Early childhood and compulsory education: Reconceptualising the relationship (pp. 149–173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Leach, J., & Moon, B. (2008). The power of pedagogy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, W. (1984). Célestin Freinet, the unknown reformer. The Educational Forum, 48(1), 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Malaguzzi, L. (1993). For an education based on relationships. Young Children, 49(1), 9–12.Google Scholar
  49. Malaguzzi, L. (1998). History, ideas, and basic philosophy: An interview with Lella Gandini. In S. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach–advanced reflections (pp. 49–97). Westport, Conneticut: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Martinuzzi, P. (2007). Children’s Literature. In G. Marrone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Italian literary studies, A-J (Vol. 1, pp. 462–466). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Merz, A. H., & Glover, M. (2006). Are We There Yet?: One public school’s journey in appropriating the Reggio Emilia approach. scholarlypartnershipsedu, 1(1). Retrieved from,
  52. Moss, P. (2007). Bringing politics into the nursery: early childhood education as a democratic practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moss, P. (2014). Transformative change and real utopias in early childhood education. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. New, R. S. (2000). Reggio Emilia: Catalyst for change and conversation. Retrieved 1.12.2013, from ERIC clearinghouse on elementary and early childhood education
  55. O’Brien, L. M. (2002). A response to “Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice”. Educational Researcher, 31(5), 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Page, R. (2006). Curriculum matters. In D. Hansen (Ed.), John Dewey and our educational prospect: A critical engagement with Dewey’s Democracy and education (pp. 39–66). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rankin, B. (2004). Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky: Connections with Malaguzzi and the Reggio approach. In J. Hendrick (Ed.), Next steps toward teaching the Reggio way (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  58. Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia listening, researching and learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Rinaldi, C. (2013). Re-imagining Childhood: The inspiration of Reggio Emilia education principles in South Australia. Adelaide, SA: Government of South Australia Retrieved from,
  60. Salvadori, M., & Mathys, A. (2002). Apologizing to the ancient fable: Gianni rodari and his influence on Italian children’s literature. The Lion and the Unicorn, 26(2), 169–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schecter, B. (2011). “Development as an aim of education”: A reconsideration of Dewey’s vision. Curriculum Inquiry, 41(2), 250–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schiavo, A. (1991). Borghi, Lamberto. Enciclopedia Italiana Appendix V, (accessed 14.01.14). Retrieved from,
  63. Schwarcz, E., & Francesconi, F. (2007). Borghi, lamberto encyclopaedia judaica, Vol. 4 (2nd ed., p. 85). Michigan: Thomson Gale.Google Scholar
  64. Stamopoulos, E. (2012). Reframing early childhood leadership. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(2), 42.Google Scholar
  65. Tanner, L. N. (1991). The meaning of curriculum in Dewey’s laboratory school (1896–1904). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tarr, P. (2001). Aesthetic codes in early childhood classrooms: What art educators can learn from ReggioEmilia. Art Education, 54(3), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vecchi, V. (2010). Art and creativity in Reggio Emilia: Exploring the role and potential of ateliers in early childhood education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Weiss, S., DeFalco, A., & Weiss, E. (2005). Progressive = Permissive? Not According to John Dewey…Subjects Matter! Essays in Education, 14. Retrieved from,
  69. Wharton, E. (1902). Vesalius in Zante. (1564). The North American Review, 175(552), 625–631.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations