Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 435–445 | Cite as

The Culture of Teacher Leadership: A Survey of Teachers’ Views in Hong Kong Early Childhood Settings

  • Yuen Ling Li


Several leadership approaches have been advocated as effective ways of bringing about substantial changes in practices. “Instructional” or “transactional leadership” describes the qualities of a leader who provides the vision and impetus for change. In contrast, “transformational leadership” refers to those whose approach is more consistent with evolving trends in educational reform such as empowerment, distributed leadership, and co-construction of learning. Hong Kong has launched a variety of education reforms that focus on quality of learning and teaching. While there has been a general recognition of the importance of teacher leadership few efforts have been made to identify and promote specific approaches to teacher leadership designed to bring about desired improvements at the early childhood stage. The present study examines how teacher leaders conceive their role within current school leadership models. In this study kindergarten/preschool teachers of the senior management team were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning various aspects of leadership. Factor analysis, however, was unable to replicate the clear patterns found in Western countries which broadly differentiated between transactional and transformational styles of leadership. Instead a mix of styles was more often reported. A number of possible explanations for this finding are considered and some implications for policy makers wishing to transform kindergarten education in Hong Kong are put forward.


Teacher leadership Early years teachers Teacher development School development 



This work was supported by the grant GRF (General Research Fund: Grant No 843411) from the Hong Kong University Grant Council. The opinions expressed are the author’s and do not represent views of the funding agencies.


  1. Acker-Hocevar, M., & Touchton, D. (2011). A model of power as social relationships: Teacher leaders describe the phenomena of effective agency in practice. In E. B. Hilty (Ed.), Teacher leadership: The “new” foundations of education (1st ed., pp. 239–264). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson, E. (2001). Integrating leadership styles and ethical perspectives. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(4), 244–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). MLQ for researchers. Retrieved from
  7. Belchetz, D., & Leithwood, K. (2007). Successful leadership: Does context matter and if so, how? In C. Day, & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (1st ed., pp. 11–137). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau, Education. (2000). Performance indicators. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.Google Scholar
  11. Bureau, Education. (2006). Quality assurance inspection annual report. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.Google Scholar
  12. Caldwell, B. (2003). A blueprint for successful leadership in an era of globalization in learning. In P. Hallinger (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective (1st ed., pp. 23–40). Lisse: Swets&Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dimmock, C. (2000). Hong Kong’s school reform: Importing western policy into an Asian culture. In C. Dimmock, & A. Walker (Eds.), Future school administration: Western and Asian perspectives (1st ed., pp. 191–223). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research.Google Scholar
  16. Duff, A. (1997). A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle & Tait’s revised approaches to studying inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Education Bureau. (2007). New initiatives in pre-primary education (EMB Circular No. 1/2007). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government.Google Scholar
  18. Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based accountability systems in education (1st ed., pp. 65–98). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald, T. (2003). Interrogating orthodox voices: Gender, ethnicity and educational leadership. School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuhrman, S. H. (1999). The new accountability (CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-27). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Google Scholar
  21. Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16–20.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, P. L. (1995). Measuring attitudes to science: Unidimensionality and internal consistency revisited. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardner, P. L. (1996). The dimensionality of attitude scales: A widely misunderstood Idea. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 913–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallinger, P. (1996a). Challenging and changing Primrose. Prime Focus, 2(4), 20–29.Google Scholar
  28. Hallinger, P. (1996b). Nourishing the spirit: The role of ritual in building communities of learners. Journal of Staff Development, 17(1), 22–26.Google Scholar
  29. Hallinger, P. (1998). Educational change in Southeast Asia: The challenge of creating learning systems. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(5), 492–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Mastering the infinite game: How East Asian values are transforming business practices (1st ed.). Mankato, MN: Capstone Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership and Management, 23(3), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hart, A. W. (1994). Creating teacher leadership roles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 472–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmes, D. H., Tangtongtavy, S., & Tomizawa, R. (1995). Working with the Thais: A guide to managing in Thailand. Thailand: White Lotus Bangkok.Google Scholar
  36. Krüger, M. L., Witziers, B., & Sleegers, P. (2007). The impact of school leadership on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lam, J. (2003). Balancing stability and change: Implications for professional preparation and development of principals in Hong Kong. In P. Hallinger (Ed.), Reshaping the landscape of school leadership development: A global perspective (1st ed., pp. 175–190). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  38. Law, E. H. F. (2011). Exploring the role of leadership in facilitating teacher learning in Hong Kong. School Leadership & Management, 31(4), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leithwood, K. (2000). Organizational learning and school improvement. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  40. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership & Management, 20(4), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2009). New perspectives on an old idea. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (1st ed., pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Li, Y. L. (2009). The perspectives and experiences of Hong Kong preschool teacher mentors: Its implications for mentoring. Teacher Development, 13(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li, Y. L. (2010). School development in Hong Kong early childhood education: Understanding progress eight years after the implementation of school improvement initiatives. Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  44. Li, Y. L. (2011). The negotiated project-based learning: understanding the views and practice of kindergarten teachers about the implementation of project learning in Hong Kong. Education 313, 39(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  45. Li, Y. L. (2012). Leadership for learning: The case of teacher leadership in Hong Kong preschools. Paper presented at the 13th Pacific Early Childhood Education Research Association (PECERA) conference, Singapore.Google Scholar
  46. Li, Y. L., & Lim, S. E. (2012). Educational innovations in Hong Kong: its implications of policy change for early childhood development. In J. B. Mottely, & A. R. Randall (Eds.), Early education (1st ed., pp. 1–20). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (2000). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In The Jossey-Bass (Ed.), Reader on educational leadership (1st ed., pp. 339–345). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Marks, H., & Printy, S. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McMillan, J.H., & Schumaker, S. (1993). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Mulford, B. (2003). Balance and learning: Crucial elements in leadership for democratic schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(2), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes: What do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Munby, H. (1997). Issues of validity in science attitude measurement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norusis, M. J. (1990). SPSS base system user’s guide (1st ed.). Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  54. O’Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pell, T., & Hargreaves, L. (2011). Making sense of cluster analysis: Revelations from Pakistani science classes. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reid, I., Brain, K., & Boyes, L. C. (2004). Teachers or learning leaders? Where have all the teachers gone? Gone to be leaders, everyone. Educational Studies, 30(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spillane, J. (2006). Distributed leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  58. Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2002). School leadership and administration: Adopting a cultural perspective (1st ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  59. Walker, A., & Ko, J. (2011). Principal leadership in an era of accountability: A perspective from the Hong Kong context. School Leadership and Management, 31(4), 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams, T. R. (2003). The impact of household wealth and poverty on child development outcomes: Examining asset effects. St, Louis, MO: Washington University, George Warren Brown School of Social Work.Google Scholar
  61. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Youngman, M. B. (1979). Analysing social and educational research data. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Early Childhood EducationThe Hong Kong Institute of EducationHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations