Managing Student Behavior with Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: An Observational Study in Early Elementary Classrooms
- 2.5k Downloads
Comprehensive evidence-based interventions are needed to help early childhood educators manage challenging student behaviors. One such intervention, class-wide function-related intervention teams (CW-FIT), is a multi-tiered behavioral intervention program based on positive behavior support principles, including four main elements: (a) teaching socially appropriate communication skills, (b) using differential reinforcement with an interdependent group contingency, (c) extinguishing or eliminating potential reinforcement for problem behavior, and (d) implementing individual interventions using self-management, help cards, and/or functional assessment. This study implemented CW-FIT with five kindergarten through second grade teachers. Results demonstrated efficacy of the program as early childhood teachers increased their praise rates and decreased their reprimand rates, and students responded with increased on-task behavior and fewer classroom disruptions. Study implications and limitations are addressed.
KeywordsClassroom management Positive behavior support Early childhood
The research reported in this article was supported by a grant from the Institute of Education Sciences and the U.S. Department of Education (R324A120344), awarded to the University of Kansas. The opinions presented in this article are those of the authors, and no endorsement by the agency is intended or implied.
- Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91(3), 409–421.Google Scholar
- Cohn, A. M. (2001). Positive behavioral supports: Information for educators (fact sheet). Retrieved from the National Association of School Psychologists website, http://www.nasponline.org/resources/factsheets/pbs_fs.aspx.
- Conroy, M. A., & Brown, W. H. (2004). Early identification, prevention, and early intervention with young children at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders: Issues, trends, and a call for action. Behavioral Disorders, 29(3), 224–236.Google Scholar
- Dweck, C. S. (1999). Caution: Praise can be dangerous. American Educator, 23(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
- Fullerton, E., Conroy, M., & Correa, V. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ use of specific praise statements with young children at risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 34(3), 118–135.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system-rating scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
- Kamps, D., Wills, H. P., Heitzman-Powell, L., Laylin, J., Szoke, C., Petrillo, T., et al. (2011). Class-wide function-related intervention teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13(3), 154–167. doi: 10.1177/1098300711398935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katz, L. G. (n.d.). Ask Dr. Katz archive: Question 13. Retrieved from http://illinoisearlylearning.org/ask-dr-katz/question013.htm.
- Katz, L. G. (1993). Distinctions between self-esteem and narcissism: Implications for practice. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ED363452).Google Scholar
- Kerr, M. M., & Nelson, C. M. (2006). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Kohn, A. (2001). Five reasons to stop saying, “good job!”. Young Children, 56(5), 24–30.Google Scholar
- Öneren Şendil, Ç., & Tantekin Erden, F. (2014). Peer preference: A way of evaluating social competence and behavioural well-being in early childhood. Early Child Development and Care, 184(2), 230–246, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2013.778254.
- Rich, H. L., & Ross, S. M. (1989). Students’ time on learning tasks in special education. Exceptional Children, 55(6), 508–515.Google Scholar
- Stormont, M. A., Smith, S. C., & Lewis, T. J. (2007). Teacher implementation of precorrection and praise statements in Head Start classrooms as a component of a program-wide system of positive behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 280–290. doi: 10.1007/s10864-007-9040-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., & Gonen, O. (2011). Single-case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis, Version 1.0 (Web-based application). College Station, TX: Texas A & M University. Retrieved from www.singlecaseresearch.org.
- Wagner, M., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Epstein, M. H., & Sumi, W. C. (2005). The children and youth we serve: A national picture of the characteristics of students with emotional disturbances receiving special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13, 79–96. doi: 10.1177/10634266060140010201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker, H. M., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J. R., Bricker, D., et al. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194–209. doi: 10.1177/106342669600400401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. H. (1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders: SSBD. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar