Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 57–62 | Cite as

Extended Day Kindergarten: Supporting Literacy and Motor Development through a Teacher Collaborative Model



The kindergarten teachers in the Levittown School District implement an extended day to enhance academic and social development of their students. A description of the literacy and motor skills cluster program and specific examples of a thematic instructional unit are included. Teachers receive professional development and training and are provided with a Literacy and Motor Skills Handbook. They are also given opportunities to attend formal and informal district meetings in order to promote dialogue and enhance student achievement. Research addresses the impact of extended hours on the kindergarten program. Teacher collaboration and student achievement in literacy and motor skill applications are explored, as well as assessment implementation. An overview of the program is delivered in this article, which can be utilized in other school districts.


Extended Kindergarten Literacy Motor Collaboration Assessment Thematic 


  1. Blaydes, J. (2000). How to make learning a moving experience. Virginia Department of Education Video, Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J., & Fisher, P. (2006). Balanced literacy: One middle school’s experience. Principal Leadership, 7(1), 38–40.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, W., Cone, T. P., & Cone, S. L. (2007). A collaborative approach to developing an interdisciplinary unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26(2), 3–124.Google Scholar
  4. Gable, R. A., Mostert, M. P., & Tonelson, S. W. (2004). Assessing professional collaboration in schools: Knowing what works. Preventing School Failure, 48(3), 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gullo, D. F. (1990). The changing family context: Implications for the development of all-day kindergartens. Young Children, 45(4), 35–39.Google Scholar
  6. Hannaford, C. (1995). Smart moves: Why learning is not all in your head. Arlington, VA: Great Ocean Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Austin, TX: National Center for Family and Community with Schools, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. (ERIC Document No. ED 474 521).Google Scholar
  8. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107–110, Sect. 9101 (32), 115 Stat. 1425 (2002). Retrieved October 9, 2007 from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg107.html#sec9101.
  9. Perez-Katz, A. (2007). Teacher support systems: A collaboration model. Principal Leadership, 7(9), 38–41.Google Scholar
  10. Reynolds, A. J., Mavrogenes, N. A., Hagemann, M., & Bezruczko, N. (1993). Schools families and children: Sixth year results from the longitudinal study of children at risk. Chicago: Chicago Public Schools Department of Research, Evaluation and Planning. (ERIC Document No. 362 307).Google Scholar
  11. Steven-Smith, D. (2004). Movement and learning: A valuable connection. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 18(1), 10–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LiteracyLevittown School DistrictLevittownUSA

Personalised recommendations