Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 239–244 | Cite as

Family, Friend, and Neighbor Child Caregivers: Results of a Statewide Study to Determine Needs and Desires for Support

  • Pamela Marie Drake
  • Bayla Greenspoon
  • Lisa Unti
  • Linda K. Fawcett
  • Sarah Neville-Morgan

Family, friend and neighbor (FFN) child caregivers represent a significant proportion of caregivers for young children. Yet, these caregivers receive little support for their services. In 2003, the First 5 California Children and Families Commission (First 5 California) began a study to determine the work-related needs of FFN caregivers in California. This paper reports on the results of all study activities, including focus groups and interviews with caregivers and parents. It details the specific needs related to licensing, materials and equipment, education and training, and support systems that were identified by FFN caregivers, parents, and other stakeholders as being important to improve the quality and working conditions of FFN care. It also discusses needs of agencies that provide services to FFN caregivers, including awareness of and knowledge about the population, funding and other resources, and professional development topics.


child care early education relative care family child care focus groups professional development training caregiver support educational materials 



This work was completed as a part of the First 5 Family, Friend, and Neighbor Child Caregiver Support Project for the First 5 California Children and Families Commission. See www.ccfc.ca.gov/ffn.

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Heather Brockett, Nicole Jayne, Gina Lepore, and Barbara Witkowski to this project as well as Emily Nahat, Deputy Director of Program Management at First 5 California.


  1. Bromer J., Henley J. R., (2002). Policy initiatives for the informal child care sector. Poverty Research News. 6(1)Google Scholar
  2. Brown-Lyons M., Robertson A., Layzer J., (2001). Kith and kin—Informal child care: Highlights from recent research. National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Casper L. M., (1996). Who’s minding our preschoolers? United States Commerce Department, Economics and Statistics Administration. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Drake P. J., Greenspoon B., Fawcett L. K., (2005). Family, friend, and neighbor (FFN) caregivers: The question of licensing. First 5 California Children and Families Commission, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Drake P. J., Unti L., Greenspoon B., & Fawcett L. K. (2004a). Focus group results. First 5 California informal child caregiver support project. First 5 California Children and Families Commission. Available at: http://www.ccfc.ca.gov/FFN/aboutPopulation/index.htm, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake P. J., Unti L., Greenspoon B., & Fawcett L. K. (2004b). First 5 California informal child caregiver support project kit for new parents focus groups with family, friend, and neighbor caregivers. Sacramento, CA: First 5 California Children and Families Commission. Available at: http://www.ccfc.ca.gov/FFN/aboutPopulation/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuller B., Kagan S. L., et al. (2000). Remember the children: Mothers balance work and child care under welfare reform (Growing up in poverty project 2000: Wave 1 findings). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley and New Haven, CT: Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. Galinsky, E., Howes, C., Kontos, S., & Shinn, M. (1994). The study of children in family childcare: Highlights of findings. New York: Families and Work InstituteGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldstein A., Go C., Garling A., Whitebook M., (2002). Talking with license exempt or informal child care providers: An often overlooked yet possible rich reserve for alleviating the childcare crisis. University of California Cooperative ExtensionGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgan G., Elliott K., Beaudette C., Azer S., (2001). Non-licensed forms of child care in homes: Issues and recommendations for state support. Wheelock College Center for Career Development in Early Care and Education, Boston Google Scholar
  11. National Center for Early Development and Learning (NCEDL) (2002). Regulation of child care. Early Childhood Research Policies and Briefs, 2(1)Google Scholar
  12. Porter R., Rice R., Mabon S., (2003). Doting on kids: Understanding quality in kith and kin child care. Institute for a Child Care Continuum, Bank Street College of Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Savage S. (2003). Educational needs of CCRC providers: Report on license-exempt child care providers (Report No. 03-CDSS-003). Child Care Resource Center, Child Development Support ServicesGoogle Scholar
  14. Shonkoff J., Phillips D., (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods. The science of early childhood development. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith K. (2002). Who’s minding the kids? Childcare arrangements: Spring 1997. Current Population Reports (pp. 70–86). Washington, DC: U.S. Census BureauGoogle Scholar
  16. Sonenstein F. L., Gates G. J., Schmidt S., Bolshun N., (2002). Primary child care arrangements of employed parents: Findings from the 1999 National Survey of America’s Families (Occasional Paper No. 59). The Urban Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Susman-Stillman A. (2004). Family, friend and neighbor care: Promoting quality care and children’s healthy development. Sacramento, CA: First 5 California Children and Families Commission. Available at: http://www.ccfc.ca.gov/FFN/reviewLit/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. Walker S. K., (2004). Extension’s support of informal child care providers. The Forum for Family & Consumer Issues, NC State University, 9(1)Google Scholar
  19. Zinsser C., (2001). Reports from the field: Child care within the family. Caring for Infants and Toddlers, The Future of Children, II(I)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Marie Drake
    • 1
  • Bayla Greenspoon
    • 1
  • Lisa Unti
    • 1
  • Linda K. Fawcett
    • 1
  • Sarah Neville-Morgan
    • 2
  1. 1.ETR AssociatesScotts ValleyUSA
  2. 2.First 5 California Children and Families CommissionSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations