Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 98, Issue 11, pp 2213–2221 | Cite as

Mapping of stakeholder activities and habitats to inform conservation planning for a national marine sanctuary



The Florida Keys is recognized as the birth place of flats fishing, but the flats fishery has historically been underappreciated by resource managers because it is a catch and release fishery. However, the fishery is increasingly threatened by habitat degradation and user conflicts. Ongoing regulatory revisions in the Florida Keys prompted us to work with flats fishing guides to document spatial fishing coverage and habitats so that this information could be included in management revisions. We used a geostatistical approach to create contour maps depicting fishing coverage and habitats, and provided this information to resource managers. This participatory GIS approach engages stakeholders in the management process, uses their knowledge of the resource, and contributes to resource and fisheries conservation. This study, in combination with research on the economic impact of the flats fishery, presents the flats fishery as an important conservation tool for the region and underscores the implication of relationships between researchers and data providers in the saltwater recreational fishery.


Catch and release GIS Stakeholder Recreational fishing Management 



This project was funded in part through grants provided by The Nature Conservancy, Florida KeysKeeper, and Bonefish & Tarpon Trust. We are most grateful to the local fishing guides for placing considerable trust in our methods and this work would not have been possible without their knowledge and input. Capt. Duane Baker and Capt. John O’Hearn were instrumental in organizing meetings with their respective fishing guides associations. We thank the Florida Wildlife Research Institute for providing integral GIS benthic data layers to the project. Printed maps used during the interview process were donated by Teall’s Guides of Keys Charts, Inc.


  1. Aceves-Bueno E, Adeleye AS, Bradley D, Brandt WT, Callery P, Feraud M, Garner KL, Gentry R, Huang Y, McCullough I, Pearlman I, Sutherland SA, Wilkinson W, Yang Y, Zink T, Anderson SE, Tague C (2015) Citizen science as an approach for overcoming insufficient monitoring and inadequate stakeholder buy-in in adaptive management: criteria and evidence. Ecosystems 18:493–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams AJ, Blewett DA (2004) Spatial patterns of estuarine habitat types use and temporal patterns in abundance of juvenile permit, Trachinotus falcatus, in Charlotte Habor, Florida. Gulf Caribb Res 16:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams AJ, Murchie KJ. (2015). Recreational fisheries as conservation tools 19 for mangrove habitats. Proceedings of 2nd International Mangroves as Fish Habitat 20 Symposium. Mazatlan, Mexico. American Fisheries Society PublicationGoogle Scholar
  4. Agostini VN, Margles SM, Schill SR, Knowles JE, Blyther RJ (2010) Marine zoning in Saint Kitts and Nevis: a path towards sustainable management of marine resources. Nature ConservancyGoogle Scholar
  5. Alessi J, Fiori C (2014) From science to policy—a geostatistical approach to identifying potential areas for cetacean conservation: a case study of bottlenose dolphins in the Pelagos sanctuary (Mediterranean Sea). J Coast Conserv 18:449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L (2005) Spatial statistical modeling in a GIS environment. In: Maguire DJ, Batty M, Goodchild MF (eds) GIS, Spatial Analysis and Modeling, 1st edn. ESRI Press, Redlands, p 100Google Scholar
  7. Battista T, O’Brien K (2015) Spatially prioritizing seafloor mapping for coastal and marine planning. Coast Manag 43:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruger GE, Haddad KD (1986) Management of Tarpon, Bonefish and Snook in Florida. National Coalition for Marine Conservation, TampaGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke SJ, Coux IG (2006) Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biol Conserv 128:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke SJ, Phillipp DP (2004) Behavior and mortality of caught-and-released bonefish (Albula spp.) in Bahamian waters with implications for a sustainable recreational fishery. Biol Conserv 188:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke SJ, Danylchuk AJ, Danychuk SE, Suski CD, Goldberg TL (2006) Is catch-and-release recreational angling compatible with no-take marine protected areas? Coast Manag 49:342–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa B, Taylor JC, Kracker L, Battista T, Pittman S (2014) Mapping reef fish and the seascape: using acoustics and spatial modeling to guide coastal management. PLoS One 9:e85555PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coux IG, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ (2010) Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. J Fish Biol 76:2194–2215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowder LB, Hazen EL, Avissar N, Bjorkland R, Latanich C, Ogburn MB (2008) The impacts of fisheries on marine ecosystems and the transition to ecosystem-based management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douvere F (2008) The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar Policy 32:762–771, Interpolation toolset concepts. (2011) EsriCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ESRI (2011) ArcGIS desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  17. Fedler T (2013) Economic Impact of the Florida Keys Flats Fishery. Bonefish & Tarpon Trust, http://www.bonefishtarpontrust.org/images/stories/BTT%20-%20Keys%20Economic%20Report.pdf (last accessed 11/4/2014)
  18. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission-Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center (CSC), Dade County (2001) Benthic Habitats South Florida. FWRIGoogle Scholar
  19. Grech A, Parra GJ, Beasley I, Bradley J, Johnson S, Whiting S, i-Anthawirriyarra Sea Rangers, Yanyuwa Families, Marsh H (2014) Local assessments of marine mammals in cross-cultural environments. Biodivers Conserv 23:3319–3338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpern BS et al (2007) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heyman WD, Granados-Dieseldorff P (2012) The voice of the fisherman of the Gulf Coast of Honduras: Improving regional fisheries management through fisher participations. Fish Res 125–126:129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kopperoinen L, Itkonen P, Niemelä J (2014) Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology. Landsc Ecol 29:1361–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larkin MF, Ault JS, Humston R, Luo J (2010) A mail survey to estimate the fishery dynamics of southern Florida’s bonefish charter fleet. Fish Manag Ecol 17:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehmann A, Lachavanne JB (1997) Geographic information systems and remote sensing in aquatic botany. Aquat Bot 58:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin SR, Onuf CP, Dunton KH (2008) Assessment of propeller and off-road vehicle scarring in seagrass beds and wind-tidal flats of the southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Bot Mar 51:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCluskey SM, Lewison RL (2008) Quantifying fishing effort: a synthesis of current methods and their applications. Fish Fish 9:188–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller RR et al (2014) A spatially distinct history of the development of California Groundfish fisheries. PLoS One 9:e99758PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ochwada-Doyle FA, McLeod J, Barrett G, Clake G, Gray CA (2014) Spatial patterns of recreational exploitation in eastern Australian ROFAs: implications for zonal management. Fish Manag Ecol 21:283–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oh C, Ditton RB (2006) Using recreation specialization to understand multi-attribute management preferences. Leis Sci 28:369–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parnell PE, Dayton PK, Fisher RA, Loarie CC, Darrow RD (2010) Spatial patterns of fishing effort off San Diego: implications for zonal management and ecosystem function. Ecol Appl 20:2203–2222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pomeroy R, Douvere F (2008) The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar Policy 32:816–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Read AD, West RJ, Haste M, Jordan A (2011) Optimizing voluntary compliance on marine protected areas: a comparison of recreational fisher and enforcement officer perspectives using a multi-criteria analysis. J Environ Manage 92:2558–2567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sorice MG, Flamm RO, McDonald S (2007) Factors influencing behavior in a boating speed zone. Coast Manag 35:357–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stein JA, Shultz AD, Cooke SJ, Danychuk AJ, Hayward K, Suski CD (2012) The influence of hook size, type, and location on hook retention and survival of angled bonefish (Albula vulpes). Fish Res 113:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stewart KR, Lewison RL, Dunn DC, Bjorkland RH, Kelez S, Halpin PN, Crowder LB (2010) Characterizing fishing effort and spatial extent of coastal fisheries. PLoS One 5:e14451PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Villamagna AM, Mongollón B, Angermeier PL (2014) A multi-indicator framework for mapping cultural ecosystem services: The case for freshwater recreational fishing. Ecol Indic 45:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilen JE, Smith MD, Lockwood D, Botsford LW (2002) Avoiding suprises: incorporating fisherman behavior into management models. Bull Mar Sci 70:553–575Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brooke D. Black
    • 1
  • Aaron J. Adams
    • 2
  • Chris Bergh
    • 3
  1. 1.Bonefish & Tarpon TrustTavernierUSA
  2. 2.Bonefish & Tarpon TrustVero BeachUSA
  3. 3.The Nature ConservancyBig Pine KeyUSA

Personalised recommendations