Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 98, Issue 10, pp 2083–2092 | Cite as

Testing the thermal-niche oxygen-squeeze hypothesis for estuarine striped bass

  • Richard T. Kraus
  • David H. Secor
  • Rebecca L. Wingate


In many stratified coastal ecosystems, conceptual and bioenergetics models predict seasonal reduction in quality and quantity of fish habitat due to high temperatures and hypoxia. We tested these predictions using acoustic telemetry of 2 to 4 kg striped bass (Morone saxatilis Walbaum) and high-resolution spatial water quality sampling in the Patuxent River, a sub-estuary of the Chesapeake Bay, during 2008 and 2009. Striped bass avoided hypoxic (dissolved oxygen ≤2 mg·l−1) subpycnocline waters, but frequently occupied habitats with high temperatures (>25 °C) in the summer months, as cooler habitats were typically not available. Using traditional concepts of the seasonal thermal-niche oxygen-squeeze, most of the Patuxent estuary would be considered unsuitable habitat for adult striped bass during summer. Application of a bioenergetics model revealed that habitats selected by striped bass during summer would support positive growth rates assuming fish could feed at one-half of maximum consumption. Occupancy of the estuary during summer by striped bass in this study was likely facilitated by sufficient prey and innate tolerance of high temperatures by sub-adult fish of the size range that we tagged. Our results help extend the thermal-niche oxygen-squeeze hypothesis to native populations of striped bass in semi-enclosed coastal systems. Tolerance of for supraoptimal temperatures in our study supports recent suggestions by others that the thermal-niche concept for striped bass should be revised to include warmer temperatures.


Thermal-niche oxygen-squeeze hypothesis Striped bass habitat Bioenergetics 



We thank volunteers and student assistants who contributed to the successful execution of the field work: Beverly Bachman, Brooke Bittner, Bill Connelly, Pat Daly, Kari Fenske, Deanna Hanks, Pete Ide, Lisa Kerr, David Loewensteiner, Adam Peer, Chris Ruck, Kara Schroepfer, Mike Wilberg, Paine Wingate, and Ryan Woodland. We are grateful to NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office who supported this work through a grant awarded to DHS and RTK (NA07NMF4570332). A major part of the analysis was conducted with the aid of a faculty development leave award from George Mason University (Fairfax, VA) for which RTK is grateful. We thank David “Bo” Bunnell (USGS) for thoughtful comments on the manuscript, and we would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript. The implantation of acoustic transmitters was carried out under approved animal care and use protocols of the University of Maryland. Mention of brand or trade names is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. This is contribution 1936 of the US Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center (Ann Arbor, Michigan).


  1. Boisclair D, Leggett WC (1989) The importance of activity in biogenergetics models applied to actively foraging fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1859–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandt SB, Kirsch J (1993) Spatially explicit models of striped bass growth potential in Chesapeake Bay. Trans Am Fish Soc 122(5):845–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandt SB, Mason DM, Patrick EV (1992) Spatially-explicit models of fish growth rate. Fisheries 17(2):23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt SB, Gerken M, Hartman KJ, Demers E (2009) Effects of hypoxia on food consumption and growth of juvenile striped bass (Morone saxatilis). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 381(Supplement 1):S143–S149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breitburg DL et al (2003) The pattern and influence of low dissolved oxygen in the Patuxent River, a seasonally hypoxic estuary. Estuaries 26(2A):280–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caddy J (2000) Marine catchment basin effects versus impacts of fisheries on semi-enclosed seas. ICES J Mar Sci 57(3):628–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheek T, Van Den Avyle M, Coutant C (1985) Influences of water quality on distribution of striped bass in a Tennessee River impoundment. Trans Am Fish Soc 114(1):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen V et al (2009) Fisheries ecosystem model of the Chesapeake Bay: methodology, parameterization, and model exploration. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries ServiceGoogle Scholar
  9. Claireaux G, Lefrançois C (2007) Linking environmental variability and fish performance: integration through the concept of scope for activity. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362(1487):2031–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costantini M, Ludsin SA, Mason DM, Zhang XS, Boicourt WC, Brandt SB (2008) Effect of hypoxia on habitat quality of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Chesapeake Bay. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65(5):989–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coutant CC (1985) Striped bass, temperature, and dissolved oxygen: a speculative hypothesis for environmental risk. Trans Am Fish Soc 114(1):31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coutant CC (2013) When is habitat limiting for striped bass? Three decades of testing the temperature–oxygen squeeze hypothesis. Am Fish Soc Symp 80:65–91Google Scholar
  13. Coutant CC, Benson DL (1990) Summer habitat suitability for striped bass in Chesapeake Bay—reflections on a population decline. Trans Am Fish Soc 119(4):757–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coutant CC, Carroll DS (1980) Temperatures occupied by ten ultrasonic-tagged striped bass in freshwater lakes. Trans Am Fish Soc 109(2):195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coutant CC, Zachman KL, Cox DK, Pearman BL (1984) Temperature selection by juvenile striped bass in laboratory and field. Trans Am Fish Soc 113(5):666–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig JK, Crowder LB (2005) Hypoxia-induced habitat shifts and energetic consequences in Atlantic croaker and brown shrimp on the Gulf of Mexico shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 294:79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R (2008) Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321(5891):926–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eby LA, Rudstam LG, Kitchell JF (1995) Predator responses to prey population dynamics: an empirical analysis based on lake trout growth rates. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52(7):1564–1571Google Scholar
  19. Fisher TR, Hagy JD, Boynton WR, Williams MR (2006) Cultural eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent estuaries of Chesapeake Bay. Limnol Oceanogr 51(1):435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fry FEJ (1971) The effect of environmental factors on the physiology of fish. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ (eds) Fish physiology, vol 6. Academic, New York, pp 1–98Google Scholar
  21. Gauthier DT et al (2008) Mycobacteriosis-associated mortality in wild striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from Chesapeake Bay, USA. Ecol Appl 18(7):1718–1727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagy J, Boynton W, Keefe C, Wood K (2004) Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuar Coasts 27(4):634–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen MJ et al (1993) Applications of bioenergetics models to fish ecology and management: where do we go from here? Trans Am Fish Soc 122(5):1019–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanson PC (1997) Fish bioenergetics 3.0 for WindowsGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartman KJ, Brandt SB (1993) Systematic sources of bias in a bioenergetics model: examples for age-0 striped bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 122(5):912–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartman KJ, Brandt SB (1995a) Predatory demand and impact of striped bass, bluefish, and weakfish in the Chesapeake Bay—applications of bioenergetic models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52(8):1667–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartman KJ, Brandt SB (1995b) Trophic resource partitioning, diets, and growth of sympatric estuarine predators. Trans Am Fish Soc 124(4):520–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hasler C, Suski C, Hanson K, Cooke S, Tufts B (2009) The influence of dissolved oxygen on winter habitat selection by largemouth bass: an integration of field biotelemetry studies and laboratory experiments. Physiol Biochem Zool 82(2):143–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson JR, Hightower JE (2001) Reservoir striped bass movements and site fidelity in relation to seasonal patterns in habitat quality. N Am J Fish Manag 21(1):34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaushal SS et al (2010) Rising stream and river temperatures in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 8(9):461–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kilpatrick JM, Ney JJ (2013) Temperature and dissolved oxygen habitat use by striped bass and hybrid striped bass in Claytor Lake, Virginia. Am Fish Soc Symp 80:147–159Google Scholar
  32. Lapointe D, Vogelbein WK, Fabrizio MC, Gauthier DT, Brill RW (2014) Temperature, hypoxia, and mycobacteriosis: effects on adult striped bass Morone saxatilis metabolic performance. Dis Aquat Org 108(2):113–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magnuson JJ (2010) History and heroes: the thermal niche of fishes and long-term lake ice dynamics. J Fish Biol 77(8):1731–1744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mansueti RJ (1961) Age, growth, and movements of the striped bass, Roccus saxatilis, taken in size selective fishing gear in Maryland. Chesap Sci 2(1/2):9–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matthews WJ, Hill LG, Edds DR, Gelwick FP (1989) Influence of water quality and season on habitat use by striped bass in a large southwestern reservoir. Trans Am Fish Soc 118(3):243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ney JJ (1993) Bioenergetics modeling today: growing pains on the cutting edges. Trans Am Fish Soc 122:736–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Niklitschek E, Secor D (2005) Modeling spatial and temporal variation of suitable nursery habitats for Atlantic sturgeon in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64(1):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pihl L, Baden S, Diaz R, Schaffner L (1992) Hypoxia-induced structural changes in the diet of bottom-feeding fish and Crustacea. Mar Biol 112(3):349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pikitch EK et al (2004) Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305(5682):346–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pörtner HO, Knust R (2007) Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance. Science 315(5808):95–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Price KS et al (1985) Nutrient enrichment of Chesapeake Bay and its impact on the habitat of striped bass—a speculative hypothesis. Trans Am Fish Soc 114(1):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards RA, Rago PJ (1999) A case history of effective fishery management: Chesapeake Bay striped bass. N Am J Fish Manag 19(2):356–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts JJ, Grecay PA, Ludsin SA, Pothoven SA, Vanderploeg HA, Höök TO (2012) Evidence of hypoxic foraging forays by yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and potential consequences for prey consumption. Freshw Biol 57(5):922–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruane RJ, Hauser GE, Sawyer AF (2013) Water quality modeling as a management tool for striped bass and hybrid striped bass. Am Fish Soc Symp 80:161–179Google Scholar
  45. Rubec PJ, Coyne MS, McMichael RH, Monaco ME (1998) Spatial methods being developed in Florida to determine essential fish habitat. Fisheries 23(7):21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Secor DH (2000) Spawning in the nick of time? Effect of adult demographics on spawning behaviour and recruitment in Chesapeake Bay striped bass. ICES J Mar Sci 57:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoner AW, Manderson JP, Pessutti JP (2001) Spatially explicit analysis of estuarine habitat for juvenile winter flounder: combining generalized additive models and geographic information systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213:253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson JS, Rice JA (2013) The relative influence of thermal experience and forage availability on growth of age 1–5 striped bass in two southeastern reservoirs. Am Fish Soc Symp 80:93–120Google Scholar
  49. Thompson JS, Rice JA, Waters DS (2010) Striped bass habitat selection rules in reservoirs without suitable summer habitat offer insight into consequences for growth. Trans Am Fish Soc 139(5):1450–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wingate RL, Secor DH, Kraus RT (2011) Seasonal patterns of movement and residency by striped bass within a subestuary of the Chesapeake Bay. Trans Am Fish Soc 140(6):1441–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamanaka H (2013) Hypoxic conditions enhance refuge effect of macrophyte zone for small prey fish from piscivorous predators. Fish Manag Ecol 20(6):465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zale AV, Wiechman JD, Lochmiller RL, Burroughs J (1990) Limnological conditions associated with summer mortality of striped bass in Keystone Reservoir, Oklahoma. Trans Am Fish Soc 119(1):72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard T. Kraus
    • 1
  • David H. Secor
    • 2
  • Rebecca L. Wingate
    • 2
  1. 1.US Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Erie Biological StationSanduskyUSA
  2. 2.Chesapeake Biological LaboratoryUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental ScienceSolomonsUSA

Personalised recommendations