Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 97, Issue 8, pp 929–938 | Cite as

Estuarine predator—prey interactions in the early life history of two eels (Anguilla rostrata and Conger oceanicus)

  • Victoria L. Musumeci
  • Kenneth W. Able
  • Mark C. Sullivan
  • Jennifer M. Smith


Field observations (timing of larval ingress from 1989 to 2010) and laboratory experiments (habitat preference, predation, cannibalism by glass eels and elvers) were conducted to better understand the interactions between the early life history stages of two eel species, Anguilla rostrata and Conger oceanicus, which both ingress annually to Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey. A 21-year weekly time series revealed that these species generally overlap in occurrence in spring, but the degree of overlap may be changing over time: the peak in A. rostrata glass eel abundance occurring later and the peak in C. oceanicus leptocephali abundance occurring earlier. During this overlap period and subsequent settlement, the two species show differences in habitat use patterns, with both preferring shelter, but only A. rostrata burying in substrate. In one-on-one trials, cannibalism was infrequent (A. rostrata 1 % of 59 trials, C. oceanicus 16 %, of 51 trials). Predation by C. oceanicus elvers on A. rostrata glass eels and elvers was frequent (45 % of 165 trials), but never occurred for the opposite interaction. This order presumably is related to the larger size of C. oceanicus at ingress, metamorphosis and settlement compared to A. rostrata and the aggressive piscivory of C. oceanicus even extending to cannibalism. Together, these observations of predation and the change in timing of C. oceanicus occurrence in the estuary may influence the success of A. rostrata immediately after ingress and thus contribute to the decline of the latter. Further, these interactions provide another example of predation in estuaries (presumed refugia) and the contributing role of predation on and among the early life history stages of fishes—a relatively underexplored phenomenon.


Predator–prey Eels Estuaries Temporal occurrence Anguilla rostrata Conger oceanicus Laboratory Habitat preference 



This publication is the result of research sponsored by the Stacy Moore Hagan Scholarship to the senior author, Rutgers University Marine Field Station long-term larval monitoring, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey Professional Science Master’s Program in Environmental Science, and New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium with funds from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of Sea Grant, U.S. Department of Commerce, under NOAA grant number # NA16RG1047 and the NJSGC. This paper is Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences Contribution No. 2013–5.


  1. Able KW, Fahay MP (2010) Ecology of estuarine fishes: Temperate waters of the Western North Atlantic. John Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Able KW, Hagan S, Kovitvongsa K, Brown S, Lamonaca J (2007) Piscivory by the mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus): evidence from the laboratory and salt marshes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecology 345:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASMFC (Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission) (2000) Interstate fishery management plan for American Eel. Fishery Management Report No.36Google Scholar
  4. Baker R, Sheaves M (2005) Redefining the piscivore assemblage of shallow estuarine nursery habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 291:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker R, Sheaves M (2006) Visual surveys reveal high densities of large piscivores in shallow estuarine nurseries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 323:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck MW, Heck KL Jr, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern BS, Hayes CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ, Sheridan PF, Weinstein MP (2003) The role of nearshore ecosystems as fish and shellfish nurseries. Issues in Ecol 11:1–12Google Scholar
  7. Bell GW, Witting DA, Able KW (2003) Aspects of metamorphosis and habitat use in Conger Eel, Conger oceanicus. Copeia 3:533–552Google Scholar
  8. Bonhommeau S, Chassot E, Planque B, Rivot E, Knap A, Le Pape O (2008) Impact of climate on eel populations of the Northern Hemisphere. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 373:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Busch W, Lary S, Castilione C, McDonald R (1998) Distribution and availability of Atlantic Coast freshwater habitats for American Eel (Anguilla rostrata). Administrative Report #98-2. USFWS, Amherst NY 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Casselman JM (2003) Dynamics of resources of the American eel, Anguilla rostrata: declining abundance in the 1990’s. In: Aida K, Tsukamoto K, Yamauchi K (eds) Eel biology. Springer, Tokyo, pp 255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castonguay M, Hodson P, Couillard C, Eckersely M, Dutil J, Verreault G (1994) Why is recruitment of the American eel declining in the St. Lawrence River and Gulf Canadian. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Correia A, Able K, Antunes C, Coimbra J (2004) Early life history of the American conger eel (Conger oceanicus) as revealed by otolith microstructure and microchemistry of metamorphosing leptocephali. Marine Biology 145:477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Sylva DP, Kalber FA Jr, Shuster CN (1962) Fishes and ecological conditions in the shore zone of the Delaware River Estuary, with notes on other species collected in deeper water. Univ Del Mar Lab Inf Ser Publ 5:1–164Google Scholar
  14. Haro A, Krueger W (1988) Pigmentation, size and migration of elvers (Agnuilla rostrata[Lesueur]) in a coastal Rhode Island stream. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:2528–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haro A, Richkus W, Whalen K, Hoar A, Busch WD, Larry S, Brush T, Dixon D (2000) Population decline of the American eel: implications for research and management. Fisheries 25(9):7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helfman G, Clark J (1986) Rotational feeding: overcoming gape-limited foraging in anguillid eel. Copeia 3:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Layman CA, Dahlgren CP, Kellison GT, Adams AJ, Gillanders BM, Kendall MS, Ley JA, Nagelkerken I, Serafy JE (2006) Marine nurseries and effective juvenile habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 318:307–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levy A, Able K, Grimes C, Hood P (1988) Biology of the conger eel Conger oceanicus in the Mid-Atlatntic Bight. II. Foods and feeding ecology. Marine Biology 98(4):597–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moriarty C, Dekker W (1997) Management of the European Eel. Irish Fisheries Bulletin 15:1–44Google Scholar
  20. Paterson AW, Whitfield AK (2000) Do shallow water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51(3):359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierron F, Baudrimont M, Dufour S, Elie P, Bossy A, Baloche S, Mesmer-Dudons N, Gonzalex P, Bourdineaud J-P, Massabuau J-C (2008) How cadmium could compromise the completion of the European eels’ reproductive migration. Environmental Science and Technology 42(12):4607–4612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sheaves M (2001) Are there really few piscivorous fishes in shallow estuarine habitats? Marine Ecology Progress Series 222:279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheaves M, Baker R, Johnston R (2006) Marine nurseries and effective juvenile habitats: an alternative view. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 318:303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silberschneider V, Pease BC, Booth DJ (2004) Estuarine habitat preferences of Anguilla australis and A. reinhardtii glass eels as inferred from laboratory experiments. Environmental Biology of Fishes 71:395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silberschneider V, Pease BC, Booth DJ (2001) A novel artificial habitat collection device for studying resettlement patterns in anguillid glass eels. Journal of Fish Biology 58:1359–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sullivan M, Able K, Hare J, Walsh H (2006) Anguilla rostrata glass eel ingress into two, U.S. east coast estuaries: patterns, processes and implications for adult abundance. Journal of Fish Biology 69:1081–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sullivan M, Wuenschel M, Able KW (2009) Inter and intra-estuary variability in ingress, conditon and settlement of the American eel Anguilla rostrata: implications for estimating and understanding recruitment. Journal of Fish Biology 47:1949–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang CH, Tzeng WN (2000) The timing of metamorphosis and growth rates of American and European eel leptocephali: a mechanism of larval segregative migration. Fisheries Research 46:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wattendorf RJ (1979) Cannibalism in elvers. The Progressive Fish Culturist 41:218–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Witting DA, Able KW, Fahay MP (1999) Larval fishes of a Middle Atlantic Bight estuary: assemblage structure and temporal stability. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wirth T, Bernatchez L (2003) Decline of North Atlantic eels: a fatal synergy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 270:681–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wuenschel M, Able K (2008) Swimming ability of eels (Anguilla rostrata, Conger oceanicus) at estuarine ingress: contrasting patterns of cross-shelf transport. Marine Biology 154:775–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wuenschel MJ, Hare JA, Kimball ME, Able KW (2012) Evaluating juvenile thermal tolerance as a constraint on adult range of gray snapper (Lutjanus griseus): a combined laboratory, field and modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 436–437:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria L. Musumeci
    • 1
  • Kenneth W. Able
    • 2
  • Mark C. Sullivan
    • 3
  • Jennifer M. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.URS CorporationFort WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers, Marine Field Station, Institute of Marine and Coastal SciencesThe State University of New JerseyTuckertonUSA
  3. 3.Marine Science ProgramSchool of Natural Sciences and MathematicsThe Richard Stockton College of New JerseyGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations