The effects of surgically implanted acoustic transmitters on laboratory growth, survival and tag retention in hatchery yearling Chinook salmon
- 569 Downloads
Telemetry has proven an effective means for studying the movement of fishes, however, biases associated with tagged animals requires careful scrutiny if accurate conclusions are to be made from field studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate growth, survival, and tag retention in hatchery yearling Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) juveniles with intracoelomic surgically implanted acoustic transmitters representing 2.6 to 5.6% of body weight. The first trial consisted of three treatments; passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag-only (25 fish), acoustic-tag+PIT-tag (25 fish), and sham-surgery+PIT-tag (25 fish). There were no significant differences in relative growth rate (% change in weight day−1) among treatments over the 221 day trial. Survival in the acoustic-tag treatment (80%) was not significantly different from the PIT-tag-only and sham treatments (92 and 88% respectively). The second trial consisted of three treatments; PIT-tag-only (22 fish), acoustic-tag+PIT-tag with absorbable sutures (12 fish) and acoustic-tag+PIT-tag with non-absorbable sutures (12 fish). There were no significant differences in relative growth rate among treatments over the 160 day trial. Survival in the second trial was 100%. Fish with absorbable sutures healed sooner and with less inflammation compared to fish with non-absorbable sutures. Tag retention was 100% in both trials. The results of this study suggest that acoustic transmitters of less than 5.6% body weight can be effectively used in 1-year old Chinook salmon.
KeywordsChinook salmon Juvenile Acoustic transmitter Tag effects
This manuscript was greatly improved by the comments of two anonymous reviews, to which we are sincerely grateful. Statistical advice provided by E.J. Dick, A. Pike, and K. Mull. We thank the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s Coleman National Fish Hatchery, especially K. Brown and S. Hamelburg for providing the fish and facilities used in this study. We thank A.P. Klimley of UC Davis for housing fish during a portion of the first trial. We thank H. Fish and E. Sturm for laboratory assistance and support. We thank P. Brandes for providing the active transmitters use in the second trial. Reference to trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Brown RS, Carlson TJ, Welch AE, Stephenson JR, Abernethy CS, Ebberts BD, Langeslay MJ, Ahmann ML, Feil DH, Skalski JR, Townsend RL (2009) Assessment of barotrauma from rapid decompression of depth-acclimated juvenile Chinook salmon bearing radiotelemetry transmitters. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:1285–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chapman ED, Hearn AR, Michel CJ, Sandstrom PT, Ammann AJ, Thomas MJ, Singer GP, Peterson ML, Lindley SL, MacFarlane RB (2012) Diel movements of outmigrating Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead (O. mykiss) smolts in the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed. Environmental Biology of Fishes, (this issue)Google Scholar
- Jepsen N, Schreck C, Clements S, Thorstad EB (2003) A brief discussion on the 2% tag/body mass rule of thumb. In: Spedicato MT, Lembo G, Marmulla G (eds.) Aquatic telemetry: advances and applications. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Fish Telemetry held in Europe, FAO/COISPA, Ustica, Italy, pp. 255–259Google Scholar
- Michel CJ, Ammann AJ, Chapman ED, Sandstrom PT, Fish HE, Thomas MJ, Singer GP, Lindley ST, Klimley AP, Macfarlane RB (2012) The effects of environmental factors on the migratory movement patterns of Sacramento River yearling late-fall run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Environmental Biology of Fish. (this issue)Google Scholar
- Weatherley AH, Gill HS (1995) Growth. In: Groot C, Margolis L, Clarke WC (eds) Physiological ecology of Pacific salmon. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 101–158Google Scholar
- Welch DW, Melnychuk MC, Rechisky ER, Porter AD, Jacobs MC, Ladouceur A, McKinley RS, Jackson GD (2009) Freshwater and marine migration and survival of endangered Cultus Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) smolts using post, a large-scale acoustic telemetry array. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:736–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Winter JD (1983) Underwater biotelemetry. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 371–395Google Scholar