Skip to main content
Log in

Ecological risk assessment of multiple hatchery programs in the upper Columbia watershed using Delphi and modeling approaches

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecological risks of Pacific salmon (spring, summer, and fall run Chinook, coho, and sockeye salmon) and steelhead trout hatchery programs operated between 2013 and 2023 in the Upper Columbia Watershed will be assessed using Delphi and modeling approaches. Committees composed of resource managers and public utility districts identified non-target taxa of concern (i.e., taxa that are not the target of supplementation), and acceptable hatchery impacts (i.e., change in population status) to those taxa. Biologists assembled information about hatchery programs, non-target taxa, and ecological interactions and this information will be provided to expert panelists in the Delphi process to facilitate assessment of risks and also used to populate the Predation, Competition, and Disease (PCD) Risk 1 model. Delphi panelists will independently estimate the proportion of a non-target taxa population that will be affected by each individual hatchery program. Estimates from each of the two approaches will be independently averaged, a measure of dispersion calculated (e.g., standard deviation), and subsequently compared to the acceptable hatchery impact levels that were determined previously by committees of resource managers and public utility districts. Measures of dispersion will be used to estimate the scientific uncertainty associated with risk estimates. Delphi and model results will be compared to evaluate the qualities of the two approaches. Furthermore, estimates of impacts from each hatchery program will be combined together to generate an estimate of cumulative impact to each non-target taxon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Busack CA, Currens KP, Pearsons TN, Mobrand LM (2005) Tools for evaluating ecological and genetic risks in hatchery programs. Final report to Bonneville Power Administration (project 2003-058-00, contract BPA00016399)

  • Ham KD, Pearsons TN (2001) A practical approach for containing ecological risks associated with fish stocking programs. Fisheries 25(4):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchery Scientific Review Group (HSRG) (2009) Columbia River hatchery reform project final system-wide report. http://www.hatcheryreform.us/hrp/reports/system/welcome_show.action. Accessed July 28, 2010

  • Letcher BH, Rice JA, Crowder LB, Binkowski FP (1996) Size-dependent effects of continuous and intermittent feeding on starvation time and mass loss in starving yellow perch larvae and juveniles. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA, Keith D, Tietjen J, Burgman MA, Maunder M, Master L, Brook BW, Mace G, Possingham HP, Medellin R, Andelman S, Regan H, Regan T, Ruckelshaus M (2004) Comparing predictions of extinction risk using models and subjective judgement. Acta Oecol 26(2004):67–74. doi:10.1016/actao.2004.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch A, Peven C (2005) Conceptual approach to monitoring and evaluating the Chelan County Public Utility District Hatchery Programs. Final report to the Chelan PUD Habitat Conservation Plan’s Hatchery Committee

  • Pearsons TN (2008) Misconception, reality, and uncertainty about ecological interactions and risks between hatchery and wild salmonids. Fisheries 33(6):278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsons TN (2010) Operating hatcheries within an ecosystem context using the adaptive stocking concept. Fisheries 35(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsons TN, Busack CA (2011) PCD Risk 1: a tool for assessing and reducing ecological risks of hatchery operations in freshwater. Environmental Biology of Fishes

  • Pearsons TN, Hopley CW (1999) A practical approach for assessing ecological risks associated with fish stocking programs. Fisheries 24(9):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearsons TN, Langshaw RB (2009) Monitoring and evaluation plan for Grant PUDs salmon and steelhead supplementation programs. Grant PUD, Ephrata

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan TJ, Master LL, Hammerson GA (2004) Capturing expert knowledge for threatened species assessments: a case study using NatureServe conservation status ranks. Acta Oecol 26(2004):95–107. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2004.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedan A (2002) Okanagan environmental knowledge and fisheries management. Report to Okanagan National Fisheries Commission. Okanagan Nation Alliance, Westbank

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Wells Hatchery Committee, Rocky Reach Hatchery Committee, and Priest Rapids Coordinating Committees Hatchery Sub-Committee for their work on selection of NTTOC, containment objectives, and regional experts. We also thank the many local experts who helped with providing data and opinions about interactions. These experts included: John Arterburn, Charles Snow, John Crandall, Kirk Truscott, and David Hopkins. Ali Wick and Carmen Andonaegui were instrumental in helping facilitate discussions as well as recording and compiling information. Chad Herring created Fig. 1. Public Utility District Number 1 of Chelan County, Public Utility District Number 1 of Douglas County, and Public Utility District Number 2 of Grant County helped fund this effort.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd N. Pearsons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearsons, T.N., Murdoch, A.R., Mackey, G. et al. Ecological risk assessment of multiple hatchery programs in the upper Columbia watershed using Delphi and modeling approaches. Environ Biol Fish 94, 87–100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9884-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9884-1

Keywords

Navigation