Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Re-use of shallow sediment patches by Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) in Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada

  • Trevor B. Haynes
  • Clifford L. K. Robinson
Article

Abstract

We determined whether, during the summers of 2002–2004, young-of-the-year (YOY) Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) re-used patches of sediment in intertidal and shallow subtidal regions of Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada. We examined re-use weekly at a single sediment patch in 2003 and 2004 via mark-recapture methods, monthly by re-sampling 15 patches in 2002 and interannually by re-sampling 36 patches in all 3 years (2002–2004). The mark-recapture results showed that, within each summer, batch marked YOY sand lance re-used the same patch up to 8 weeks later. The re-sampling of 15 patches over 4 months in 2002 showed that YOY sand lance consistently occupied patches within a season. We found the greatest variability in sediment patch re-use at the interannual time scale with major fluctuations in occurrence and abundance during 2002–2004. The interannual variability in patch re-use is most likely linked to abundance rather than the local or regional environmental characteristics that we examined.

Keywords

Ammodytes hexapterus Distribution Habitat re-use Occurrence Pacific sand lance Site fidelity Temporal variability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was obtained from the Species at Risk Interdepartment Recovery Fund administered by Environment Canada and awarded to CLKR. Logistical support was provided by the Western and Northern Service Centre, Parks Canada Agency, and Pacific Rim National Park Reserve of Canada. We would like to thank Eric Baron, Ryan Stevenson, Dan Vedova, Darren Salisbury, Devan Haynes and Andrew George for their contributions to fieldwork and Michael Collyer for his assistance with the GIS analysis. Also, thanks to Andrea Hunter and the Bamfield Marine Science Center for logistical support. We greatly appreciated feedback on the manuscript from Veronica Padula and two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Able KW, Hales JLS, Hagan SM (2005) Movement and growth of juvenile (age 0 and 1+) tautog (Tautoga onitis [L.]) and cunner (Tautogolabrus adspersus [Walbaum]) in a southern New Jersey estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 327:22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abookire AA, Piatt JF (2005) Oceanographic conditions structure forage fishes into lipid-rich and lipid-poor communities in lower Cook Inlet, Alaska, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adey WH (1978) Algal ridges of the Caribbean Sea and West Indies. Phycologia 17:361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson PJ, Piatt JF (1999) Community reorganization in the Gulf of Alaska following ocean climate regime shift. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ardron JA (2002) A recipe for determining benthic complexity: An indicator of species richness. Chapter 23. In: Breman J (ed) Marine Geography: GIS for the Oceans and Seas. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, USA, pp 169–175Google Scholar
  6. Arnott SA, Ruxton GD (2002) Sandeel recruitment in the North Sea: demographic, climatic and trophic effects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell JD, Westoby M (1986) Abundance of macrofauna in dense seagrass is due to habitat preference, not predation. Oecologia 68:1432–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell JD, Steffe AS, Westoby M (1988) Location of seagrass beds in estuaries: effects on associated fish and decapods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 122:127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byers MM (2001) The ecology of age-1 copper rockfish (Sebastes caurinus) in vegetated habitats of Sitka Sound, Alaska. MSc. thesis. Univeristy of Alaska, FairbanksGoogle Scholar
  10. Ciannelli L (1997) Winter dormancy in the Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) in relation to gut evacuation time. In: Baxter BR (ed) Forage Fishes in Marine Ecosystems. Proceedings of the international symposium on the role of forage fishes in marine ecosystems. Report No. 97–01. University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Fairbanks, p 816Google Scholar
  11. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: User manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  12. Dick MH, Warner IM (1982) Pacific sand lance, Ammodytes hexapterus Pallas, in the Kodiak Island group, Alaska. Syesis 15:43–50Google Scholar
  13. Duarte CM, Klaff J (1986) Littoral slope as a predictor of the maximum biomass of submerged macrophyte communities. Limnol Oceanogr 31:1072–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engelhard GH, van der Kooij J, Bell ED, Pinnegar JK, Blanchard JL, Mackinson S, Righton DA (2008) Fishing mortality versus natural predation on diurnally migrating sandeels Ammodytes marinus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 369:213–227. doi: 10.3354/meps07575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Folk RL (1974) In: Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill, Austin, pp 1–159Google Scholar
  16. Foreman MGG, Thomson RE (1997) Three-dimensional model simulations of tides and buoyancy currents along the west coast of Vancouver Island. J Phys Oceanogr 27:1300–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedlaender AS, Hazen EL, Nowacek DP, Halpin PN, Ware C, Weinrich MT, Hurst T, Wiley D (2009) Diel changes in humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae feeding behavior in response to sand lance Ammodytes spp. behavior and distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:91–100. doi: 10.3354/meps08003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauld JA (1990) Movements of lesser sandeels Ammodytes marinus Raitt tagged in the northwestern North Sea. J Conseil Conseil Int Pour’Exploration Mer 46:229–231Google Scholar
  19. Girsa II, Danilov AN (1976) The defensive behavior of the White Sea sand lance Ammodytes hexapterus. J Ichthyol 16:862–865Google Scholar
  20. Hamada T (1966) Studies on fluctuation in the abundance of larval sand-lance in the Harima-nada and Osaka-Bay 1. Relation between the progeny-abundance and the age composition of parent fish. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 32:393–398Google Scholar
  21. Hamada T (1967) Studies on fluctuation in the abundance of larval sand-lance in the Harima-nada and Osaka-Bay. 4. Relation between the number of eggs and the catch of 0-age fish. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 33:410–416Google Scholar
  22. Haynes TB (2006) Modeling habitat use of Young-of-the-Year Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) in the nearshore region of Barkley Sound, British Columbia. MSc. thesis. University of Victoria, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  23. Haynes TB, Ronconi RA, Burger AE (2007) Habitat use and behavior of the Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) in the shallow subtidal region of southwestern Vancouver Island. Northwest Nat 88:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haynes TB, Robinson CLK, Dearden P (2008) Modelling nearshore intertidal habitat use of young-of-the-year Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus) in Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada. Environ Biol Fish 83:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hobson ES (1986) Predation on the Pacific sand lance, Ammodytes hexapterus (pises: Ammodytidae), during the transition between day and night in Southeastern Alaska. Copeia 10:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland GJ, Greenstreet SPR, Gibb IM, Fraser HM, Robertson MR (2005) Identifying sandeel Ammodytes marinus sediment habitat preferences in the marine environment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 303:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen H (2001) Settlement dynamics in the lesser sandeel Ammodytes marinus in the North Sea. PhD. University of Aberdeen, AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  28. Keddy PA (1982) Quantifying within-lake gradients of wave energy: interrelationships of wave energy, substrate particle size and shoreline plants in Axe Lake, Ontario. Aquat Bot 14:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kishi MJ, Kimura S, Nakata H, Yamashita Y (1991) A biomass-based model for the sand lance (Ammodytes personatus) in Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Ecol Model 54:247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kühlmann DHH, Karst H (1967) Freiwasserbeobachtungen zum Verhalten vos Tobias Fisch-schwarmen (Ammodytidae) in der westlichen Ostsee. Z Tierpsychol 24:282–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Macer CT (1965) The distribution of larval sandeels (Ammodytidae) in the southern North Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 45:187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNemar Q (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12:153–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naud M-J, Long B, Brêthes J-C, Sears R (2003) Influences of underwater bottom topography and geomorphology on minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) distribution in the Mingan Islands (Canada). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:889–896. doi: 10.1017/S0025315403008002h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinto JM, Pearson WH, Anderson JW (1984) Sediment preferences and oil contamination in the Pacific sand lance Ammodytes hexapterus. Mar Biol Berl 83:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poloczanska ES, Cook RM, Ruxton GD, Wright PJ (2004) Fishing vs. natural recruitment variation in sandeels as a cause of seabird breeding failure at Shetland: a modelling approach. ICES J Mar Sci 61:788–797. doi: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.03.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quinn T (1999) Habitat characteristics of an intertidal aggregation of Pacific sandlance (Ammodytes hexapterus) at a North Puget Sound beach in Washington. Northwest Sci 73:44–49Google Scholar
  37. Quinn T, Schneider DE (1991) Respiration of the teleost fish Ammodytes hexapterus in relation to its burrowing behavior. Comp Biochem Physiol 98A:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robards MD, Piatt JF (1999) Biology of the genus Ammodytes - the sand lances. In: Robards MD, Willson MF, Armstrong RH, Piatt JF (eds) Sand lance: a review of biology and predator relations and annotated bibliography, vol Research Paper PNW-RP-521. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  39. Robards MD, Piatt JF, Kettle AB, Abookire AA (1999) Temporal and geographic variation in fish communities of lower Cook Inlet, Alaska. Fish Bull 97:962–977Google Scholar
  40. Simpson JH, Hunter JR (1974) Fronts in Irish Sea. Nature 250:404–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Temming A, Götz S, Mergardt N, Ehrich S (2004) Predation of whiting and haddock on sandeel: aggregative response, competition and diel periodicity. J Fish Biol 64:1351–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Udden JA (1914) Mechanical composition of clastic sediments. Bull Geolog Soc Am 25:655–744Google Scholar
  43. van der Kooij J, Scott BE, Mackinson S (2008) The effects of environmental factors on daytime sandeel distribution and abundance on the Dogger Bank. J Sea Res 60:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willson MF, Armstrong RH, Robards MD, Piatt JF (1999) Sand lance as cornerstone prey for predator populations. In: Robards MD, Willson MF, Armstrong RH, Piatt JF (eds) Sand lance: a review of biology and predator relations and annotated bibliography. United States Department of Agriculture, Portland, pp 17–38Google Scholar
  46. Wright PJ (1996) Is there a conflict between sandeel fisheries and seabirds? A case study at Shetland. In: Greenstreet SPR, Tasker ML (eds) Aquatic predators and their prey. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 154–165Google Scholar
  47. Wright PJ, Begg GS (1997) A spatial comparison of common guillemots and sandeels in Scottish waters. ICES J Mar Sci 54:578–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright PJ, Jensen H, Tuck I (2000) The influence of sediment type on the distribution of the lesser sandeel, Ammodytes marinus. J Sea Res 44:243–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yen PPW, Huettmann F, Cooke F (2004) A large-scale model for the at-sea distribution and abundance of marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) during the breeding season in coastal British Columbia, Canada. Ecol Model 171:395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trevor B. Haynes
    • 1
    • 3
  • Clifford L. K. Robinson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Marine Protected Areas Research Group, Geography DepartmentUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Parks Canada Agency, Western and Northern Service CentreVancouverCanada
  3. 3.School of Fisheries and Ocean SciencesUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA

Personalised recommendations