Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 89, Issue 2, pp 161–162 | Cite as

Threatened fishes of the world: Salvelinus confluentus (Salmoninae)

  • Eva Schemmel
  • Jason Dunham
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Keywords

Salvelinus confluentus Salmoninae North America Conservation 

References

  1. Baxter JS, Taylor EB, Devlin RH, Hagen J, McPhail JD (1997) Evidence for natural hybridization between Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in a northcentral British Columbia watershed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavender TM (1978) Taxonomy and distribution of the bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Suckley), from the American Northwest. Calif Fish Game 64:139–174Google Scholar
  3. Dunham JB, Rieman BE (1999) Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecol Appl 9:642–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunham JB, Rieman B, Chandler G (2003) Influences of temperature and environmental variables on the distribution of bull trout within streams at the southern margin of its range. N Am J Fish Manage 23:894–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunham JB, Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Fredenberg W, Kitano S, Koizumi I, Morita K, Nakamura T, Rieman BE, Savvaitova K, Stanford J, Taylor E, Yamamoto S (2008) Evolution, ecology, and conservation of Dolly Varden, white-spotted char, and bull trout. Fisheries 33:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fraley JJ, Shepard BB (1989) Life history, ecology and population status of migratory bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Flathead Lake and river system, Montana. Northwest Sci 63(4):133–143Google Scholar
  7. Haas GR, McPhail JD (1991) Systematics and distribution of Dolly Varden and bull trout in North America. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:2191–2211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Markle DF (1992) Evidence of bull trout X brook trout hybrids in Oregon. In: Howell PJ, Buchanan DV (eds) Proceedings of the gearhart moutain bull trout workshop. Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, Corvallis, pp 58–67Google Scholar
  9. McPhail JD, Baxter JS (1996) A review of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) life-history and habitat use in relation to compensation and improvement opportunitiesGoogle Scholar
  10. Post JR, Mushens CJ, Paul AJ, Sullivan M (2003) Assessment of alternative management strategies for sustaining recreational fisheries: model development and application to bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus. N Am J Fish Manage 23:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pratt KL (1992) A review of bull trout life history. In: Howell PJ, Buchanan DV (eds) Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop. Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, Corvallis, pp 5–9Google Scholar
  12. Reist JD, Low G, Johnson JD, McDowell D (2002) Range extension of bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus, to the Central Northwest Territories, with notes on identification and distribution of dolly varden, Salvelinus malma, in the Western Canadian Arctic. Arctic 55:70–76Google Scholar
  13. Rieman BE, McIntyre JD (1993) Demographic and habitat requirements for the conservation of bull trout Salvelinus confluentus. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-302, Ogden, UTGoogle Scholar
  14. Rieman BE, coauthors (2007) Anticipated climate warming effects on bull trout habitats and populations across the Interior Columbia River Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:1552–1565Google Scholar
  15. Schmetterling DA, Long MH (1999) Montana anglers’ inability to identify bull trout and other salmonids. Fisheries 24:24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) Determination of threatened status for bull trout in the coterminous United States. Fed Regist 64:58910–58933Google Scholar
  17. Zymonas ND 2006. Age structure, growth, and factors affecting relative abundance of life history forms of bull trout in the Clark Fork River drainage, Montana and Idaho. Master’s Thesis, Montana State University, BozemanGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science CenterOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations