Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 277–284 | Cite as

Growth rate during early life affects sexual differentiation in roach (Rutilus rutilus)

  • Gregory C. Paull
  • Amy L. Filby
  • Charles R. Tyler
Article

Abstract

Many environmental factors have been shown to influence sex differentiation in fish, resulting in sex-biased populations, but the effects of growth rate have received limited attention. We conducted a controlled laboratory experiment in which growth rate and population density were manipulated in roach (Rutilus rutilus) during early development, and the subsequent effects on sex ratio determined. Significant differences in growth rate between fish populations were induced through provision of three different ration levels. In the slowest growing population there were fewer females compared within the fastest growing population (19% compared to 36% females), suggesting that in roach it may be more advantageous to become a small male than a small female when growth potential is limited. This may result from the fact that fecundity is limited by body size in female roach and that male roach are able to reproduce at a significantly smaller body size than females. In contrast, where roach were kept at different stocking densities, and there were no differences in growth rate, the subsequent proportion of females did not vary. Our data highlight the importance of controlling for growth rate in research on sexual differentiation in this species, notably when assessing for the effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals and other environmental factors, and have implications for fisheries management and aquaculture. The underlying mechanism for the influence of growth rate on sex differentiation has yet to be determined but is likely to have a strong endocrinological basis.

Keywords

Sex ratio Growth rate Density Roach Environmental sex determination (ESD) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Alan Henshaw at the Environment Agency’s fish hatchery unit, Calverton, UK, for providing the adult roach used to generate the fish for this experiment.

References

  1. Banos N, Planas JV, Gutierrez J, Navarro I (1999) Regulation of plasma insulin-like growth factor-I levels in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Comp Biochem Physiol C 124:3–40Google Scholar
  2. Baroiller JF, D’Cotta H (2001) Environment and sex determination in farmed fish. Comp Biochem Physiol C 130:399–409Google Scholar
  3. Baroiller JF, Guiguen Y, Fostier A (1999) Endocrine and environmental aspects of sex differentiation in fish. Cell Mol Life Sci 55:910–931. doi: 10.1007/s000180050344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckman BR, Shimizu M, Gadberry BA, Cooper KA (2004) Response of the somatotropic axis of juvenile coho salmon to alterations in plane of nutrition with an analysis of the relationships among growth rate and circulating IGF-I and 41 kDa IGFBP. Gen Comp Endocrinol 135:334–344. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2003.10.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beresford N, Jobling S, Williams R, Sumpter JP (2004) Endocrine disruption in juvenile roach from English rivers: a preliminary study. J Fish Biol 64:580–586. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00311.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnov EL, Bull JJ (1977) When is sex environmentally determined? Nature 266:828–830. doi: 10.1038/266828a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies CE, Shelley J, Harding PT, McLean IFG, Gardiner R, Peirson G (2004) Freshwater fishes in Britain—their species and distribution. Harley Books, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  8. Devlin RH, Nagahama Y (2002) Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208:191–364. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00057-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duan C (1997) The insulin-like growth factor system and its biological actions in fish. Am Zool 37:491–503Google Scholar
  10. Francis RC (1984) Experimental effects on agonistic behaviour in the paradise fish, Macropodus opercularis. Behaviour 85:292–313. doi: 10.1163/156853983X00273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Francis RC, Barlow GW (1993) Social control of primary sex differentiation in the Midas cichlid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10673–10675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10673 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godwin J, Luckenbach JA, Borski RJ (2003) Ecology meets endocrinology: environmental sex determination in fishes. Evol Dev 5:40–49. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2003.03007.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmgren K, Mosegaard HD (1996) Implication of individual growth status on the future sex of the European eel. J Fish Biol 49:910–925. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00089.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang YS, Rousseau K, Le Belle N, Vidal B, Burzawa-Gererd E, Marchelidon J, Dufour S (1998) Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) stimulates gonadotropin production from eel pituitary cells: a possible metabolic signal for induction of puberty. J Endocrinol 159:43–52. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1590043 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jamet JL, Desmolles F (1994) Growth, reproduction and condition of roach (Rutilus-rutilus (L)), perch (Perca-fluviatilis, L) and ruffe (Gymnocephalus-cernuus (L)) in eutrophic Lake Aydat (France). Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol 79:305–322. doi: 10.1002/iroh.19940790216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim J, Hayton WL, Schultz IR (2006) Modeling the brain-pituitary-gonad axis in salmon. Mar Environ Res 62:S426–S432. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.04.022 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraak SBM, de Looze EMA (1993) A new hypothesis on the evolution of sex determination in vertebrates: big females ZW, big males XY. Neth J Zool 43:260–273. doi: 10.1163/156854293X00034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krueger WH, Oliveira K (1999) Evidence for environmental sex determination in the American eel, Anguilla rostrata. Environ Biol Fishes 55:381–389. doi: 10.1023/A:1007575600789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawrence C, Ebersole JP, Kesseli RV (2008) Rapid growth and out-crossing promote female development in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ Biol Fishes 81:239–246. doi: 10.1007/s10641-007-9195-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonardos ID, Kagalou I, Triantafyllidis A, Sinis A (2005) Life history traits of ylikiensis roach (Rutilus ylikiensis) in two Greek lakes of different trophic state. J Freshwat Ecol 20:715–722Google Scholar
  21. Maitland PS, Campbell RN (1992) Freshwater fishes. HarperCollins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Mylonas CC, Anezaki L, Divanach P, Zanuy S, Piferrer F, Ron B, Peduel A, Ben Atia I, Gorshkov S, Tandler A (2005) Influence of rearing temperature during the larval and nursey periods on growth and sex differentiation in two Mediterranean strains of Dicentrarchus labrax. J Fish Biol 67:652–668. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00766.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Naddafi R, Abdoli A, Hassanzadeh Kiabi B, Mojazi Amiri B, Karami M (2005) Age, growth and reproduction of the Caspian roach (Rutilus rutilus caspicus) in the Anzali and Gomishan wetlands, North Iran. J Appl Ichthyol 21:492–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00669.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paull GC, Lange A, Henshaw AC, Tyler CR (2008) Ontogeny of sexual development in the roach (Rutilus rutilus) and its interrelationships with growth and age. J Morphol 269:884–895. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10641 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rincon PA, Lobon-Cervia J (1989) Reproductive and growth strategies of the red roach, Rutilus arcasii (Steindachner, 1866), in two contrasting tributaries of the River Duero, Spain. J Fish Biol 34:687–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03350.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roncarati A, Melotti P, Mordenti O, Gennari L (1997) Influence of stocking density of European eel (Anguilla anguilla, L.) elvers on sex differentiation and zootechnical performances. J Appl Ichthyol 13:131–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.1997.tb00112.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saillant E, Fostier A, Menu B, Haffray P, Chatain B (2001) Sexual growth dimorphism in sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquaculture 202:371–387. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00786-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shang EHH, Yu RMK, Wu RSS (2006) Hypoxia affects sex differentiation and development, leading to a male-dominated population in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ Sci Technol 40:3118–3122. doi: 10.1021/es0522579 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tarkan AS (2006) Reproductive ecology of two cyprinid fishes in an oligotrophic lake near the southern limits of their distribution range. Ecol Freshwat Fish 15:131–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tyler CR, Lange A, Paull GC, Katsu Y, Iguchi T (2007) The roach (Rutilus rutilus) as a sentinel for assessing endocrine disruption. Environ Sci 14:235–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. van Larebeke NA, Sasco AJ, Brophy JT, Keith MM, Gilbertson M, Watterson A (2008) Sex ratio changes as sentinel health events of endocrine disruption. Int J Occup Environ Health 14:138–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Velasco JC, Rincon PA, Lobon-Cervia J (1995) Age, growth and reproduction of the cyprinid Rutilus lemmingii (Steindachner, 1866) in the River Huebra, Central Spain. J Fish Biol 36:469–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb03549.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory C. Paull
    • 1
  • Amy L. Filby
    • 1
  • Charles R. Tyler
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental and Molecular Fish Biology Group, School of Biosciences, Hatherly LaboratoriesUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations