Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 127–138 | Cite as

Lake trout demographics in relation to burbot and coregonine populations in the Algonquin Highlands, Ontario

  • Leon M. Carl
Article

Abstract

The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that lake trout populations change in relation to cisco, lake whitefish, round whitefish and burbot populations in lakes in the Algonquin Highlands region of Ontario. Lake trout population change is greatest where cisco and lake whitefish are present. Lake trout populations in lakes without either coregonine tend to have small adults and many juveniles. Where cisco or lake whitefish are present, adult lake trout are large, juvenile abundance is low, and the stock-recruit relationship appears to be uncoupled likely due to a larval bottleneck. Lake trout populations in these lakes may be sensitive to overfishing and recruitment failure. Lake trout populations do not appear to change in relation to round whitefish. There appears to be an indirect positive change on juvenile lake trout abundance through reductions in the density of benthic coregonines in the presence of large, hypolimnetic burbot.

Keywords

Uncoupled recruitment Larval bottleneck Overfishing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tony Gentile, Fiona McGuiness and the summer students who collected and worked up the data. I also thank David Bornholdt, David Bunnell, Sandra Morrison, Nigel Lester, Stephen Riley, Jaci Savino, Christine Schmuckal and Kevin Whalen for reviewing the manuscript. This article is Contribution 1442 of the USGS Great Lakes Science Center.

References

  1. Carl LM (1992) The response of burbot, Lota lota, to change in lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush, abundance in Lake Opeongo Ontario. Hydrobiologia 243/244:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carl LM (2000) Effects of two planktivores on the fish communities in Precambrian shield lakes in southern Ontario. In: Paragamian VL, Willis D (ed) Burbot: biology, ecology and management. Pub. #1 Fish Mngmt Sect Amer Fish Soc Bethesda, pp. 81–89Google Scholar
  3. Carl LM, McGuiness F (2006) Lake whitefish and cisco population structure and niche in ten south-central Ontario lakes. Environ Biol Fishes 75:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carl LM, Bernier M-F, Christie W, Deacon L, Hulsman P, Loftus D, Maraldo D, Marshall T, Ryan P (1990) Fish community and environmental effects on lake trout. Lake Trout Synthesis. Ont Min Nat Resour, Toronto. p 47Google Scholar
  5. Carl LM, Shuter BJ, Matusek JE (1991) Production and instantaneous growth rates of lake trout before and after cisco introduction in Lake Opeongo, Ontario. Am Fish Soc Symp 12:476–480Google Scholar
  6. Casselman JM (1987) Determination of age and growth, pp. 209–242. In: Weatherly AH, Gill HS (eds) The biology of fish growth. Academic, London, p 443Google Scholar
  7. Davis CL, Carl LM, Evans DO (1997) Use of a remotely operated vehicle to study the habitat and population density of juvenile lake trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:871–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day AC (1983) Biological and population characteristics of, and interactions between an exploited burbot (Lota lota) population and an exploited lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) population from Lake Athapapuskow, Manitoba. M.Sc. Thesis. Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg. p 77Google Scholar
  9. Doyon J-F, Bernatchez L, Gendron M, Verdon R, Fortin R (1998) Comparison of normal and dwarf populations of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) with reference to hydroelectric reservoirs in northern Quebec. Arch Hydrobiol Spec Issues Advanc Limnol 50:97–108Google Scholar
  10. Eloranta A (1985) Observations on the development and growth of young burbot (Lota lota (L.)). Jyvaskylan Yliopiston Biologian Laitoksen Tiedonantoja 43:73–107 JyvaskylaGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans DO, Willox CC (1991) Loss of exploited, indigenous populations of lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush, by stocking of non-native stocks. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:134–147Google Scholar
  12. Evans DO, Olver CH (1995) Introduction of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) to inland lakes of Ontario, Canada: factors contributing to successful colonization. J Great Lakes Res 21(Suppl. 1):30–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans DO, Casselman JM, Willox CC (1991) Effects of exploitation, loss of nursery habitat and stocking on the dynamics and productivity of lake trout populations in Ontario lakes. Lake Trout Synthesis. Ont Min Nat Resour, Toronto. p 193Google Scholar
  14. Gunn JM, McMurtry MJ, Bowlby JN, Casselman JM, Liimatainen VA (1987) Survival and growth of stocked lake trout in relation to body size, stocking season, lake acidity, and biomass of competitors. Trans Am Fish Soc 116:618–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hackney PA (1973) Ecology of the burbot (Lota lota) with special reference to its role in the Lake Opeongo fish community. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Toronto, Toronto. p 152Google Scholar
  16. Hoff M, Link J, Haskell C (1997) Piscivory by Lake Superior Lake Herring (Coregonus artedi) on Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax) in winter, 1993–1995. J Great Lakes Res 23(2):210–211Google Scholar
  17. Kerr SR (1971) A simulation model of lake trout growth. J Fish Bd Can 28:809–814Google Scholar
  18. Martin WR (1940) Rate of growth of the ling Lota lota maculosa (LeSuer). Trans Am Fish Soc 70:77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin NV (1966) The significance of food habits in the biology, exploitation and management of Algonquin Park, Ontario, lake trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 95:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin NV, Fry FEJ (1973) Lake Opeongo: the ecology of the fish community and of man’s effect on it. Great Lakes Fish Comm Tech Rep 24:34Google Scholar
  21. McFadden JT, Cooper EL (1964) Population dynamics of brown trout in different environments. Physiol Zool 37:355–363Google Scholar
  22. Olver CH, Nadeau D, Fournier H (2004) The control of harvest in lake trout sport fisheries on Precambrian shield lakes. In: Gunn JM, Steedman RJ, Ryder RA (eds) Boreal shield watersheds: lake trout ecosystems in a changing environment. Lewis, Toronto, pp 193–217Google Scholar
  23. Paine RT (1974) Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia 15:93–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Post JR, Sullivan M, Cox S, Lester NP, Walters CJ, Parkinson EA, Paul AJ, Jackson L, Shuter BJ (2002) Canada’s recreational fisheries: the invisible collapse. Fisheries 27(1):6–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pothoven SA (2005) Changes in lake whitefish diet in lake Michigan, 1998–2001. Tech Rep Great Lakes Fish Comm 66:127–140Google Scholar
  26. Scott WB, Crossman EJ (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fish Res Bd Can Bull 184:996Google Scholar
  27. Shuter BJ, Matuszek JE, Regier HA (1987) Optimal use of creel survey data in assessing population behaviour: Lake Opeongo lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) and smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui), 1936–83. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44(Sup. 2):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tohtz J (1993) Lake whitefish diet and growth after introduction of mysis relicta to Flathead Lake, Montana. Trans Am Fish Soc 122(4):629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trippel EA, Beamish FWH (1989) Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) growth potential predicted from cisco (Coregonus artedi) population structure and conductivity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:1531–1538Google Scholar
  30. Trippel EA, Beamish FWH (1993) Multiple trophic level structuring in Salvelinus-Coregonus assemblages in boreal forest lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1442–1455Google Scholar
  31. Vander Zanden MJ, Casselman JM, Rasmussen JB (1999) Stable isotope evidence for the food web consequences of species invasions in lakes. Nature 401:464–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vander Zanden MJ, Shuter BJ, Lester NP, Rasmussen JB (2000) Within and among-population variation in the trophic position of a pelagic predator, lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walters C, Kitchell JF (2001) Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harkness Laboratory of Fisheries Research, Aquatic Research and Development Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyGreat Lakes Science CenterAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations