Effects of angling with a single-hook and live bait on muskellunge survival
- 94 Downloads
Use of live bait for angling of muskellunge, Esox masquinongy, is popular in Wisconsin. A traditional method utilizes a large hook through the bait fish’s snout, which requires the muskellunge to swallow the bait prior to hook set. Adult muskellunge (>76 cm; 30 in) were held in lined hatchery ponds and caught while fishing with live bait on 10/0 size single hooks. The leader was cut and the muskellunge was released when hooked in the stomach. Survival was monitored for up to 1 year. No immediate ( <24 h) mortality occurred. However, 22% of hooked muskellunge died within 50 days and 83% died within 1 year. Necropsies revealed extensive trauma to the stomach and other organs from hooks, along with systemic bacterial infections. Highest mortality on both hooked and control fish occurred over winter through spring. This peak mortality may be associated with natural stressors that occur during the spring spawning period. Mortality rates observed in this study are considered unacceptable for trophy management of muskellunge. Although use of live bait for muskellunge is traditional in Wisconsin, terminal tackle such as quick-strike rigs that hook fish in the mouth or buccal cavity should enhance the chances a released muskellunge will survive.
KeywordsEsox masquinongy Mortality Catch and release
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Thanks are due the staff at Governor Tommy Thompson Fish Hatchery, and other Department of Natural Resources staff for their support and assistance during this study. Special thanks to Joel Howard for his assistance in all phases of the study. Muskellunge were X-rayed at the Spooner Veterinary Clinic in Spooner, WI. Sue Marcquenski (WDNR fish health lab) and Marty Collins (WSLH) conducted necropsies on muskellunge and collected samples for bacterial cultures. Ruth King prepared the drawing of the muskellunge. Funding for this study was provided in part by Musky Hunter magazine, the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (F-95-P), and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
- Casselman JM, Crossman EJ, Robinson CJ (1996) Assessing sustainability of trophy muskellunge fisheries. In: Kerr SJ, Oliver CH (eds) Managing muskies in the ‘90s. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Workshop Proceedings WP-007, Kemptville, pp 29–40Google Scholar
- Harrison EJ, Hadley WF (1978) Ecological separation of sympatric muskellunge and northern pike. Am Fish Soc Special Publ 11:129–134Google Scholar
- Heiting S (1992) Musky mastery – the techniques of top guides. Krause publications, Iola, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
- Johnson LD (1971) Growth of known-age muskellunge in Wisconsin and validation of age and growth determination methods. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 49. Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
- Lyons J, Margenau T (1986) Population dynamics of stocked adult muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) in Lac Court Oreilles, Wisconsin 1961–1977. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resource Technical Bulletin 160. Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
- Muir BS (1964) Vital statistics of Esox masquinongy in Noiges Creek, Ontario. II. Population size, natural mortality and the effect of fishing. J Fish Res Board Can 21:727–746Google Scholar
- Neumann RM, Willis DW (1994) Relative weight as a condition index for muskellunge. J Fresh Ecol 9:13– 18Google Scholar
- Newman DL, Storck TW (1986) Angler catch, growth, and hooking mortality of tiger muskellunge in small centrarchid-dominated impoundments. Am Fish Soc Special Publ 15:346–351Google Scholar
- Spangler GR (1968) Angler harvest and mortality of Esox masquinongy in Pigeon and Sturgeon lakes, Ontario. J Fish Res Board Can 25:1145–1154Google Scholar
- Weithman AS, Anderson RO (1978) Angling vulnerability of Esocidae. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of Southeast Association Game and Fish Commissioners 30:99–102Google Scholar
- WDNR (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources). 1996. Wisconsin muskellunge waters. WDNR. Revision 1-3600 (82), MadisonGoogle Scholar