Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining the fundamental physiological niche of young estuarine fishes and itsrelationship to understanding distribution, vital metrics, and optimal nurseryconditions

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because estuarine nekton are ‘integrators of the environment’ abiotic and biotic factors can influence or constrain the relative value of estuarine nursery zones. Recent laboratory experiments on young spot, Leiostomus xanthurus, indicate that both water temperature and salinity significantly affect somatic growth. These experimental data contrast with previous work on young Atlantic croaker,Micropogonias undulatus, white trout,Cynoscion arenarius, and mullet,Mugil sp. Together these results suggest that quantifying vital metrics of nekton, such as survival and growth, along realistic environmental gradients through critical laboratory experiments, allows a more accurate definition of constraints on habitat use. Our studies of factors influencing recruitment success in both winter- and spring/summer-spawning fishes illustrate seasonal as well as intrafamilial differences in growth. Effective management of coastal ecosystems must take into account both variability in abiotic conditions and the nested habitat component, both of which can be modified by coastal development, which could lead to reduced productivity and sustainability of these estuarine landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baltz, D.M., J.W. Fleeger, C.F. Rakocinski & J.N. McCall. 1998. Food, density, and micro-habitat: factors affecting growth and recruitment potential of juvenile saltmarsh fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 53: 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck, Jr., K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan & M.P. Weinstein. 2001.The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51: 633–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyea, L.R. & J. Lancaster. 1999. Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86: 402–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, L. 2000. Effects of salinity on the habitat selection and growth performance of Mediterranean flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus (Osteichthyes, Mugilidae). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 50: 727–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J.K. & L.B. Crowder. 2000. Factors influencing habitat selection in fishes with a review of marsh ecosystems. pp. 241–265. In: M.P. Weinstein & D.A. Kreeger (eds.) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, L.A. 1993. Nutrient and energy transport between estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems by fish migration. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demers, E., S.B. Brandt, K.L. Barry & J.M. Jech. 2000. Spatially explicit models of growth rate potential-Linking estuarine fish production to the biological and physical environment. pp. 405–425. In: J.E. Hobbie (ed.) Estuarine Science-A Synthetic Approach to Research and Practice, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshorn, D.M. & C.E. Epifanio. 1991. Development, survival, and growth of larval weak fish at different prey abundances. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 120: 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecay, P.A. & T.E. Targett. 1996a. Effects of turbidity, light level and prey concentration on feeding of juvenile weak fish Cynoscion regalis. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 131: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecay, P.A. & T.E. Targett. 1996b. Spatial patterns in condition and feeding of juvenile weak fish in Delaware Bay. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 125: 803–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford Jr., T.E. & T.E. Targett. 1994. Suitability of estuarine nursery zones for juvenile weak fish (Cynoscion regalis ): effects of temperature and salinity on feeding, growth and survival. Mar. Biol. 119: 611–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, K.D. & T.E. Targett. 1991. Feeding, growth and survival of juvenile summer flounder (Paralichthyes dentatus ): experimental analysis of the effects of temperature and salinity. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 72: 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, K.D. & T.E. Targett. 1994. Effects of ration limitation and low temperature on growth, biochemical condition, and survival of juvenile summer flounder from two Atlantic coast nurseries. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 123: 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, J.F.K. 1978. Routine oxygen consumption of Mugil cephalus, Liza dumerili and L. richardsoni at different temperatures and salinities. Mar. Biol. 50: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, L. & S.A. Matern. 2001. Native and introduced larval shes of Suisan Marsh, California: the effects of freshwater flow. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 130: 750–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.M. & M.L. Dunn. 1980. Feeding strategies and patterns of movement in juvenile estuarine fishes. pp. 437–448. In: V.S. Kennedy (ed.) Estuarine Perspectives, Academic Press, Inc, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.M., W.H. Neill, K.A. Duchon & S.W. Ross. 2000. Ecophysiological determinants of secondary production in salt marshes: a simulation study. pp. 315–331 In: M.P. Weinstein & D.A. Kreeger (eds.) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, M.L. & L.R. Gerry. 1989. Differential effects of salinity changes on two estuarine fishes, Leiostomus xanthurus and Micropogonias undulatus. Estuaries 12: 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, M.L. & W.F. Hettler. 1989. Routine metabolism of juvenile spot, Leiostomus xanthurus, (Lacepede), as a function of temperature, salinity, and weight. J. Fish. Biol. 35: 703–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, M.L. & J.M. Miller. 1994. Effects of salinity. uctuation on routine metabolism of juvenile spot, Leiostomus xanthurus. J. Fish. Biol. 45: 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, W.H., J.M. Miller, H.W. Van Der Veer & K.O. Winemiller. 1994. Ecophysiology of marine fish recruitment: a conceptual framework for understanding interannual variability. Neth. J. Sea Res. 32: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlie, F.G., W.A. Szelistowski & W.C. Nordlie. 1982. Ontogenesis of osmotic regulation in the striped mullet, Mugil cephalus L. J. Fish. Biol. 20: 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paperno, R., T.E. Targett & P.A. Grecay. 1997. Daily growth increments in otoliths of juvenile weak fish, Cynoscion regalis: experimental assessment of changes in increment width with changes in feeding rate, growth rate, and condition factor. Fish. Bull. U.S. 95: 521–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M.E., T.E. Czapla, D.M. Nelson & M.E. Monaco. 1997. Distribution and abundance of fishes and invertebrates in Gulf of Mexico estuaries Volume II: species life history summaries. ELMR Report Number 11. NOAA/NOS Strategic Environmental Assessments Division, Silver Springs, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, K.T. 1969. An orthokinetic response to rates of salinity change in two estuarine fishes. Ecology 50: 454–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S. 2003. A conceptual view of environment-habitat-production linkages in tidal-river estuaries. Rev. Fish. Sci. 11(4): 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S. & M.R. Meador. 1994. Effects of salinity on freshwater fishes in coastal plain drainages in the South-eastern U.S. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2: 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S. & S.T. Ross. 1991. Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods along a coastal river-estuarine gradient. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 33: 467–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S., B.H. Comyns, C.F. Rakocinski & G.L. Fulling. 1999. Does salinity a. ect growth in juvenile Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus)? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 238: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S., C.F. Rakocinski, B.H. Comyns & G.L. Fulling. 2000. Laboratory growth responses of juvenile Mugil sp.to temperature and salinity: delineating optimal eld growth conditions. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 51: 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakocinski, C.F., B.H. Comyns, M.S. Peterson & G.A. Zapfe. 2002. Field growth responses of juvenile white trout (Cynoscion arenarius )to continuous variation in physical habitat conditions. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 53: 623–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 191: 382 pp.

  • Rose, K.A. 2000. Why are quantitative relationships between environmental quality and fish populations so elusive? Ecol. Appl. 10: 285–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S.W. 2003. The relative value of different estuarine nursery areas in North Carolina for transient juvenile marine shes. Fish. Bull., U.S. 101: 384–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secor, D.H., T.E. Gunderson & K. Karlsson. 2000. Effect of temperature and salinity on growth performance in anadromous (Chesapeake Bay)and nonanadromous (Santee-Cooper)strains of striped bass Morone saxatilis. Copeia 2000: 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotila, J.R., E.A. Standora, D.P. Easton & P.S. Rutledge. 1989. Bioenergetics, behavior, and resource partitioning in stressed habitats: biophysical and molecular approaches. Physiol. Zool. 62: 253–285.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, M., Comyns, B. & Rakocinski, C. Defining the fundamental physiological niche of young estuarine fishes and itsrelationship to understanding distribution, vital metrics, and optimal nurseryconditions. Environmental Biology of Fishes 71, 143–149 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-004-0302-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-004-0302-1

Navigation