Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 63, Issue 2, pp 451–469 | Cite as

Corruption and Climate Change Policies: Do the Bad Old Days Matter?

  • Per G. Fredriksson
  • Eric Neumayer
Article

Abstract

We study the effect of countries’ historical legacy with corruption on recent climate change policies and on global cooperation. Current policy outcomes build on policy choices made in previous years, and these choices were likely affected by the degree of corruption at the time. Our empirical findings using data for up to 131 countries suggest that accumulated historical experience with corruption is important for today’s policy outcomes, and appears to be more important than the current level of corruption.

Keywords

Corruption History International public goods  Climate change Environmental policy 

JEL Classification

Q54 Q58 H11 H23 H4 

References

  1. Aichele R, Felbermayr G (2012) Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations. J Environ Econ Manag 63:336–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anbarci N, Escaleras M, Register CA (2009) The Ill effects of public sector corruption in the water and sanitation sector. Land Econ 85(2):363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB (2010) Corruption and the political economy of resource-based development: a comparison of Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Resour Econ 46:511–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier EB, Markandya A (1990) The conditions for achieving environmentally sustainable development. Eur Econ Rev 34(2):659–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier EB, Damania R, Léonard D (2005) Corruption, trade and resource conversion. J Environ Econ Manag 50:276–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck T, Clarke G, Groff A, Keefer P, Walsh P (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Econ Rev 15:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besley T, Persson T (2011) Pillars of prosperity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas AK, Farzanegan MR, Thum M (2012) Pollution, shadow economy and corruption: theory and evidence. Ecol Econ 75:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohn H, Deacon RT (2000) Ownership risk, investment, and the use of natural resources. Am Econ Rev 90:526–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgess R, Hansen M, Olken BA, Potapov P, Sieber S (2012) The political economy if deforestation in the tropics. Q J Econ 127(4):1707–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campante FR, Do Q-A (2010) A centered index of spatial concentration: expected influence approach and application to population and capital cities. Mimeo. Kennedy School, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Coate S, Morris SE (1999) Policy persistence. Am Econ Rev 89:1327–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cole MA (2007) Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62:637–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Damania R, Fredriksson PG, List JA (2003) Trade liberalization, theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):490–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Damania R, Fredriksson PG, Mani M (2004) The persistence of corruption and regulatory compliance failures. Public Choice 121(3–4):363–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donchev D, Ujhelyi G (2014) What do corruption indices measure? Econ Polit 26(2):309–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, de Sherbinin A (2005) 2005 Environmental sustainability index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship, New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and PolicyGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredriksson PG, Neumayer E (2013) Democracy and climate change policies: is history important? Ecol Econ 95:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredriksson PG, Svensson J (2003) Political instability, environmental policy. J Public Econ 87:1383–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fredriksson PG, Wollscheid JR (2014) Political institutions, political careers and environmental policy. Kyklos 67(1):54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fredriksson PG, Vollebergh HRJ, Dijkgraaf E (2004) Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 47(2):207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredriksson PG, Neumayer E, Ujhelyi G (2007) Kyoto protocol cooperation: does government corruption facilitate environmental lobbying? Public Choice 133:231–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmberg S, Rothstein B, Nasiritousi N (2009) Quality of government: what you get. Annu Rev Polit Sci 12:135–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivanova K (2011) Corruption and air pollution in Europe. Oxf Econ Pap 63:49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaufmann D, Kray A, Mastruzzi M (2009) Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996–2008. World Bank Policy Research working paper no. 4978Google Scholar
  26. Knack S (2007) Measuring corruption: a critique of indicators in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. J Public Policy 27(3):245–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ko K, Samajdar A (2010) Evaluation of international corruption indexes: should we believe them or not? Soc Sci J 47:508–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15:222–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leitão A (2010) Corruption and the environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence for sulfur. Ecol Econ 69:2191–2201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. List JA, Sturm D (2006) How elections matter: theory and evidence from environmental policy. Q J Econ 121(4):1249–1281Google Scholar
  31. López R, Mitra S (2000) Corruption, pollution and the Kuznets environment curve. J Environ Econ Manag 40(2):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall MG, Jaggers K (2007) Polity IV project: dataset users’ manual. George Mason University and Center for Systemic Peace. www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2006.pdf
  33. Mungiu-Pippidi A (2006) Corruption: diagnose and treatment. J Democr 17(3):86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neumayer E (2002) Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? World Econ 25:815–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliva P (2014) Environmental regulations and corruption: automobile emissions in Mexico City. J Polit Econ (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  36. Pellegrini L, Gerlagh R (2006) An empirical contribution to the debate on corruption, democracy and environmental policy. J Environ Dev 15(3):332–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Persson T, Tabellini G (2009) Democratic capital: the nexus of political and economic change. Am Econ J Macroecon 1:88–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steves F, Treisman D, Teytelboyn A (2011) The political economy of climate change policy in the transition region. In: The low carbon transition, chap 4. EBRD and The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, LSEGoogle Scholar
  39. Welsch H (2004) Corruption, growth, and the environment: a cross-country analysis. Environ Dev Econ 9(5):663–693Google Scholar
  40. Wheeler D (2011) Quantifying vulnerability to climate change: implications for adaptation assistance. Working paper 240. Center for Global DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson JK, Damania R (2005) Corruption, political competition and environmental policy. J Environ Econ Manag 49:516–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Bank (2012) World Development Indicators CD-Rom. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Environment, Grantham Institute on Climate Change and the EnvironmentLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations