Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 443–469 | Cite as

Cooperative Management of Groundwater Resources in the Presence of Environmental Externalities

  • Encarna Esteban
  • Ariel Dinar
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates how cooperation among users can achieve a better management of groundwater in the presence of environmental externalities. Cooperation allows users to internalize the damages caused by their activities and reduce extractions. The paper develops a game theoretical framework to assess the value of cooperation in an aquifer that is divided into three sub-aquifers that are being overly exploited. Two types of externalities are modeled: first, water extractions in each sub-aquifer impact water levels in neighboring sub-aquifers (extraction externality). Second, the three sub-aquifers are also connected to an ecosystem and thus decisions in each sub-aquifer affect the health of the ecosystem (environmental externality). A cooperative game theory model is applied. The model empirically shows how the uncontrolled extractions in each sub-aquifer affects neighboring groundwater users but also cause severe impacts to the linked ecosystem. The model is tested empirically in one of the most important aquifers in Spain, the Eastern la Mancha aquifer. The results illustrate how both extraction and environmental externalities interact in affecting the likelihood of cooperation among the users. The paper estimates the value of cooperation and its stability with and without the environmental externality.

Keywords

Cooperation Non-cooperation Externalities Common-pool resources Groundwater management Ecosystem Game theory Shapley value Nash-Harsanyi solution Core Public choice 

JEL Classification

D62 D7 Q25 Q28 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson G, Opaluch J, Sullivan WM (1985) Nonpoint agricultural pollution: pesticide contamination of groundwater supplies. Am J Agric Econ 67: 1238–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jerkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297: 950–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB (1993) Valuing tropical wetland benefits: economic methodologies and applications. Geogr J Part I 59: 22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier EB (2000) Valuing the environment as input: review of applications to mangrove-fishery linkages. Ecol Econ 35: 47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier EB, Acreman M, Knowler D (1997) Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  6. Bateman I, Willis K, Garrod G (1994) Consistency between contingent valuation estimates: a comparison of two studies of UK National Parks. Reg Stud 28(5): 457–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendor T (2009) A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landsc Urban Plan 89: 17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brander LM, Florax R, Vermaat JE (2006) The empirics of wetlands valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environ Resour Econ 33: 223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brouwer R, Langford IH, Bateman IJ, Tuner RK (1999) A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Reg Environ Change 1(1): 47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castaño S, Sanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ (2010) Methodology for quantifying groundwater abstractions for agriculture via remote sensing and GIS. Water Resour Manage 24: 795–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3: 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costanza R, Farber SC, Maxwell J (1989) Valuing and management of wetland ecosystems. Ecol Econ 1: 335–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Groot R, Stuip M, Finlayson M, Davidson N (2006) Valuing wetlands: guiance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Technical Report No. 3. CBD Technical Series No. 27Google Scholar
  14. Dinar A (1994) Impact of energy costs and water resource availability on agriculture and groundwater quality in California. Resour Energy Econ 16: 47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinar A (2001) Scale and equity in water resources development: a nash bargaining model. Nat Resour Model 14(4): 477–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinar A, Howitt RE (1997) Mechanisms for allocation of environmental cost: empirical tests of acceptability and stability. J Environ Manag 49: 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dinar A, Wolf A (1997) Economic and political considerations in regional cooperation models. Agric Resour Econ Rev 26(1): 7–22Google Scholar
  18. Dinar A, Xepapadeas A (1998) Regulating water quantity and quality in irrigated agriculture. J Environ Econ Manag 54: 273–290Google Scholar
  19. Dinar A, Yaron D, Kannai Y (1986) Sharing regional cooperative gains from reusing effluent for irrigation. Water Resour Res 22(3): 339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dinar A, Dinar S, McCaffrey S, McKinney D (2007) Bridges over water: understanding transboundary water conflicts, negotiation and cooperation. World Scientific Publishers, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dufournaud CM, Harrington JJ (1990) Temporal and spatial distribution of benefits and costs in river-basin schemes: a cooperative game approach. Environ Plan 22: 615–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteban E, Albiac J (2011) Groundwater and ecosystems damages: questioning the Gisser-Sánchez effect. Ecol Econ 70: 2062–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner R, Moore M, Walker J (1997) Governing a groundwater commons: a strategic and laboratory analysis of western water law. Econ Inq 35: 218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon HS (1954) The economic theory of a common-pool property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62: 124–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gren IM (1995) The value of investing in wetlands for nitrogen abatement. Eur Rev Agric Econ 22: 157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gura EY, Maschler MB (2008) Insights into game theory. An alternative mathematical experience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gürlük S, Rehber E (2008) A travel cost study to estimate recreational value of a bird refuge at Lake Manyas, Turkey. J Environ Manag 88: 1350–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanley N, Craig S (1991) Wilderness development decisions and the Krutilla-Fisher model: the case of the Scotland flow country. Ecol Econ 4(2): 145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harsanyi JC (1959) A bargaining model for the cooperative n-person game. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contributions to the theory of games. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  30. Heimlich RE, Wiebe KD, Claassen R, Gadsby D, House RM (1998) Wetlands and agriculture. Private interests and public benefits. Agricultural Economic Report, no 765. United Sates Department of Agriculture (USDA)Google Scholar
  31. Howitt RE, Msangi S, Reynaud A, Knapp KC (2005) Estimating inter-temporal preferences in natural resource management. Am J Agric Econ 87: 969–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Judez L, de Andres R, Perez C, Urzainqui E, Ibañez M (2000) Influence of bid and subsample vectors on the welfare measure estimate in dichotomous choice contingent valuation: evidence from a case-study. J Environ Manag 60: 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Judez L, Ibañez M, Perez C (2002) Valoración del use recreativo de un humedal español. Tests y comparación de diferentes métodos de valoración. Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 192: 83–104Google Scholar
  34. Leschine TM, Wellman KF, Green TH (1997) The economic value of wetlands: Wetlands’ role in floodprotection in Western Washington. Ecology Publication no. 97-100. Washington State Department of EcologyGoogle Scholar
  35. Llamas R (1998) Conflicts between wetland conservation and groundwater exploitation: two case histories in Spain. Environ Geol Water S11: 241–251Google Scholar
  36. Locáiciga HA (2002) Sustainable ground-water exploitation. Int Geol Rev 44: 1115–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Locáiciga HA (2004) A game-theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. J Hydrol 297: 22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loehman E (1995) Cooperative solutions for problems of water supply. In: Dinar A, Loehman E (eds) Water quantity/quality management and conflict resolution: institutions, processes, and economic analysis. Greenwood Publishing Group, WestportGoogle Scholar
  39. Loehman E, Orlando J, Tschirhart J, Whinston A (1979) Cost allocation for a regional wastewater treatment system. Water Resour Res 15: 193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Madani K, Dinar A (2011) Cooperative institutions for sustainable management of common-pool resources. Water Science and Policy Center Working Paper 02-0311. Available at: http://wspc.ucr.edu/WSPC_WP_02_0311%20coop%20inst%20com%20pool.pdf
  41. Martin de Santa Olalla F, Dominguez A, Ortega F, Artigao A, Fabeiro C (2007) Bayesian networks in planning a large aquifer in Eastern Mancha, Spain. Environ Modell Softw 22: 1089–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martínez-Santos P, de Stefano L, Llamas R, Martínez-Alfaro PE (2008) Wetland restoration in the Mancha Occidental aquifer, Spain: a critical perspective on water, agricultural, and environmental policies. Restor Ecol 16: 511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milliman JW (1956) Commonality, the price system, and use of water supplies. South Econ J 22: 426–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ming J, Xian-guo L, Lin-shu X, Li-juan C, Shouzheng T (2006) “Flood mitigation benfit of wetland soil— a case study in Momoge National Reserve in China”. Ecol Econ 61: 217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nash JF Jr (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21: 128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Negri DH (1989) The common property aquifer as a differential game. Water Resour Res 25: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Negri DH (1990) Stragedy of the commons. Nat Resour Model 4: 521–537Google Scholar
  48. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100: 641–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pigou A (1920) The economics of welfare. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Polasky S, Tarui N, Ellis GM, Mason CF (2006) Cooperation in the commons. Econ Theor 29: 71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pongkijvorasina S, Roumasset J, KaeoDuartec T, Burnett K (2010) Renewable resource management with stock externalities: coastal aquifers and submarine groundwater discharge. Resour Energy Econ 32(3): 277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Provencher B, Burt O (1993) The externalities associated with the common property exploitation of groundwater. J Environ Econ Manag 24: 139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roseta-Palma C (2002) Groundwater management and endogenous water quality. J Environ Econ Manag 44: 93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roumasset JA, Wada CA (2010) Optimal and sustainable groundwater extraction. Sustainability 2: 2676–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubio JS, Casino B (2001) Competitive versus efficient extraction of a common property resource: the groundwater case. J Econ Dyn Control 25: 1117–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ruitenbeek HJ (1994) Modelling economy-ecology linkages in mangroves: economic evidence for promoting conservation in Bintuni Bay. Indonesia. Ecol Econ 10: 233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Salazar R, Szidarovszky F, Coppola E, Rojano A (2007) Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. J Environ Manag 84: 560–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanz D, Gómez-Alday JJ, Castaño S, Moratalla A, de las Heras J, Martínez-Alfaro PE (2009) Hydrostratigraphic framework and hydrogeolocigalbehaviour of the Mancha oriental system (SE Spain). Hydrogeol J 17: 1375–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanz D, Castaño S, Cassiraga E, Sahuquillo A, Gómez-Alday JJ, Peña S, Calera A (2011) Modeling aquifer-river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstractions in the Mancha oriental system (SE Spain). Hydrogeol J 19: 475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seidl AF, Moraes AS (2000) Global valuation of ecosystem services: application to the Pantanal da Nhecolandia, Brazil. Ecol Econ 33(1): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shapley LS (1953) A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contributions to the theory of games, no. II. Annals of Math. Studies, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 307–317Google Scholar
  63. Shapley LS, Shubik M (1954) A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am Polit Sci Rev 48: 787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sobuhi M, Mojarad E (2010) Application of game theory for groundwater resources management of Atrak. J Econ Agric Dev 24(1): 1–12Google Scholar
  65. Tarui N, Mason CF, Polasky S, Ellis G (2008) Cooperation in the commons with unobservable actions. J Environ Econ Manag 55: 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tsur Y (1990) Stabilization role of groundwater when surface water supplies are uncertain: the implications for groundwater development. Water Resour Res 26: 811–818Google Scholar
  67. Tsur Y, Zemel A (1995) Uncertainty and irreversibility in groundwater resource management. J Environ Econ Manag 29: 149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wattage P, Mardle S (2008) Total economic value of wetland conservation in Sri Lanka identifying use and non-use values. Wetl Ecol Manag 16: 359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. White AT, Ross M, Flores M (2000) Benefits and costs of coral reef and wetland management, Olango Island, Philippines. In: Cesar HSJ (ed) Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. Cordio, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  70. Woodward RT, Wui YS (2001) The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 37: 257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yadav S (1997) Dynamic optimization of nitrogen use when groundwater contamination is internalized at the standard in the long run. Am J Agric Econ 79: 931–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BusinessCentro Universitario de la DefensaZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.Water Science and Policy CenterUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations