Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 203–228 | Cite as

Large Scale Marine Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation Along a Linear Gradient: Cooperation, Strategic Behavior or Conservation Autarky?

  • Maarten J. Punt
  • Hans-Peter Weikard
  • Ekko C. van Ierland
  • Jan H. Stel
Open Access
Article

Abstract

In this paper we investigate effects of overlap in species between ecosystems along a linear gradient on the location of marine protected areas (MPAs) under full cooperation, strategic behavior and conservation autarky. Compared to the full cooperation outcome, both strategic behavior and conservation autarky lead to under-investment in biodiversity protection. Under strategic behavior, however, we observe the additional problem of “location leakage” i.e. countries invest less in species protected by others. Conservation autarky eliminates location leakage; in ecosystems with partly overlapping species compositions at country borders it even induces MPAs that are too large from a global perspective. We also find that, in our setting of a linear gradient without migrating species, countries focus their conservation efforts on species unique to their own country and that these species are relatively well protected compared to common species.

Keywords

Bioeconomic modeling Biodiversity conservation Game theory Marine protected areas Marine reserves Reserve site selection Linear setting 

Abbreviation

MPA

Marine protected area

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Albers HJ, Ando AW, Batz M (2008) Patterns of multi-agent land conservation: crowding in/out, agglomeration, and policy. Resour Energy Econ 30: 492–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson LG (2002) A bioeconomic analysis of marine reserves. Nat Resour Model 15: 311–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A (1998) Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ando AW, Shah P (2010) Demand-side factors in optimal land conservation choice. Resour Energy Econ 32: 203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong CW (2007) A note on the ecological-economic modelling of marine reserves in fisheries. Ecol Econ 62: 242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arthur JL, Camm JD, Haight RG, Montgomery CA, Polasky S (2004) Weighing conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protection. Ecol Appl 14: 1936–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beattie A, Sumaila UR, Christensen V, Pauly D (2002) A model for the bioeconomic evaluation of marine protected area size and placement in the North Sea. Nat Resour Model 18: 413–437Google Scholar
  8. Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland EC, Marboe AH, Starkey DJ, Townsend M, Zarzycki T (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beger M, Linke S, Watts M, Game E, Treml E, Ball I, Possingham HP (2010) Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation. Conserv Lett 3: 359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bladt J, Strange N, Abildtrup J, Svenning J-C, Skov F (2009) Conservation efficiency of geopolitical coordination in the EU. J Nat Conserv 17: 72–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bode M, Probert W, Turner WR, Wilson KA, Venter O (2011) Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives. Conserv Biol 25: 295–304Google Scholar
  12. Boncoeur J, Alban F, Guyader O, Thébaud O (2002) Fish, fishers, seals and tourists: economic consequences of creating a marine reserve in a multi-species, multi-activity context. Nat Resour Model 15: 387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabeza M, Araújo MB, Wilson RJ, Thomas CD, Cowley MJR, Moilanen A (2004) Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. J Appl Ecol 41: 252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Camm JD, Norman SK, Polasky S, Solow AR (2002) Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered. Oper Res 50: 946–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Church RL, Stoms DM, Davis FW (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol Conserv 76: 105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) COP 10 Decisions. http://www.cbd.int/decisions/cop/?m=cop-10. Cited 11-11-2011
  17. Costello C, Polasky S (2004) Dynamic reserve site selection. Resour Energy Econ 26: 157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalton TM (2004) An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites. J Environ Manag 70: 333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling C (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Game ET, Watts ME, Wooldridge S, Possingham HP (2008) Planning for persistence in marine reserves: a question of catastrophic importance. Ecol Appl 18: 670–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goeschl T, Igliori DC (2004) Reconciling conservation and development: a dynamic hotelling model of extractive reserves. Land Econ 80: 340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groeneveld RA (2010) Species-specific spatial characteristics in reserve site selection. Ecol Econ 69: 2307–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hannesson R (1998) Marine reserves: what would they accomplish?. Mar Resour Econ 13: 159–170Google Scholar
  25. Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hunter ML, Hutchinson A (1994) The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conserv Biol 8: 1163–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jantke K, Schneider UA (2010) Multiple-species conservation planning for European wetlands with different degrees of coordination. Biol Conserv 143: 1812–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kar TK, Matsuda H (2008) A bioeconomic model of a single-species fishery with a marine reserve. J Environ Manag 86: 171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kark S, Levin N, Grantham HS, Possingham HP (2009) Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 15368–15373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mainwaring L (2001) Biodiversity, biocomplexity, and the economics of genetic dissimilarity. Land Econ 77: 79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26: 867–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ngoc Q (2010) Creation of marine reserves and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Nat Resour Model 23: 138–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Polasky S, Camm JD, Garber-Yonts B (2001) Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Econ 77: 68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Polasky S, Camm JD, Solow AR, Csuti B, White D, Ding R (2000) Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biol Conserv 94: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Punt MJ, Weikard HP, Groeneveld RA, van Ierland EC, Stel JH (2010) Planning marine protected areas: a multiple use game. Nat Resour Model 23: 610–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson EA, Kaiser MJ, Edwards-Jones G, Possingham HP (2006) Sensitivity of marine-reserve design to the spatial resolution of socioeconomic data. Conserv Biol 20: 1191–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricotta C (2004) A parametric diversity measure combining the relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species. Divers Distrib 10: 143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Rarity and conservation planning across geopolitical units. Conserv Biol 16: 674–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruijs A, Janmaat J (2007) Chasing the spillovers: locating protected areas in a trans-boundary fishery. Land Econ 83: 6–22Google Scholar
  41. Sala E, Aburto-Oropeza O, Paredes G, Parra I, Barrera JC, Dayton PK (2002) A general model for designing networks of marine reserves. Science 298: 1991–1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchirico JN (2004) Designing a cost-effective marine reserve network: a bioeconomic metapopulation analysis. Mar Resour Econ 19: 41–65Google Scholar
  43. Schnier KE (2005) Biological “hot spots” and their effect on optimal bioeconomic marine reserve formation. Ecol Econ 52: 453–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith MD, Wilen JD (2003) Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behavior. J Environ Econ Manag 46: 183–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solow A, Polasky S, Broadus J (1993) On the measurement of biological diversity. J Environ Econ Manag 24: 60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Son YS, Baldick R (2004) Hybrid coevolutionary programming for Nash equilibrium search in games with local optima. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8: 305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stewart RR, Noyce T, Possingham HP (2003) Opportunity cost of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253: 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sumaila UR (1998) Bioeconomics and the ecopath/ecosim framework. In: Pauly D (ed) Use of Ecopath with Ecosim to evaluate strategies for sustainable exploitation of multispecies resources. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  49. Sumaila UR (2002) Marine protected area performance in a model of the fishery. Nat Resour Model 15: 439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van der Heide CM, van den Bergh JCJM, van Ierland EC (2005) Extending Weitzman’s economic ranking of biodiversity protection: combining ecological and genetic considerations. Ecol Econ 55: 218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weikard HP (2002) Diversity functions and the value of biodiversity. Land Econ 78: 20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weikard HP, Punt M, Wesseler J (2006) Diversity measurement combining relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species. Divers Distrib 12: 215–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weitzman ML (1992) On diversity. Q J Econ 107: 363–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weitzman ML (1993) What to preserve? An application of diversity theory to crane conservation. Q J Econ 108: 155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weitzman ML (1998) The Noah’s ark problem. Econometrica 66: 1279–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams PH, Araéjo MB (2000) Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 267: 1959–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maarten J. Punt
    • 1
  • Hans-Peter Weikard
    • 2
  • Ekko C. van Ierland
    • 2
  • Jan H. Stel
    • 3
  1. 1.Agricultural and Food Economics Chair Group, Center of Life and Food Sciences WeihenstephanTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany
  2. 2.Environmental Economics and Natural Resource GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations