Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Optimal Dynamic Control of Visitors and Endangered Species in a National Park

  • Birgit Bednar-Friedl
  • Doris A. Behrens
  • Michael Getzner
Article

Abstract

To enable visitors to enjoy nature while protecting endangered species is the key challenge for national parks around the world. In our optimal dynamic control model, a park management maximizes tourism revenues and conservation benefits net of control costs by choosing optimal dynamic levels of conservation and visitor management. The optimization is constrained by an extended food chain model representing species-habitat-visitor interactions. We illustrate for a game bird in an Alpine national park that ecotourism can indeed lead to ecosystem degradation when the park management is more concerned about increasing tourism revenues than about achieving the conservation target and if the endangered species is unknown to most visitors. If, however, the park management is well aware of the potentially negative consequences of ecotourism and hence cares for species conservation, limited ecotourism can provide funding for species conservation which ensures population levels above the uncontrolled steady state.

Keywords

Bioeconomic model Financing and managing national parks Ecotourism Optimal dynamic control Species conservation 

JEL Classification

C61 Q26 Q28 Q57 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RR, Shields S (2003) Using land as a control variable in density-dependent bioeconomic models. Ecol Model 170: 193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson LG (1993) Toward a complete economic theory of the utilization and management of recreational fisheries. J Environ Econ Manag 24: 272–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beale CM, Monaghan P (2004) Human disturbance: people as predation-free predators?.   J Appl Ecol 41: 335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednar-Friedl B, Gebetsroither B, Getzner M (2009) Willingness to pay for species conservation programs: implications for national park funding. Econ Monit 1: 9–14Google Scholar
  5. Behrens DA, Friedl B, Gebetsroither B, Getzner M, Lieb S (2006) Optimal dynamic nature conservation strategies. Klagenfurt/Graz, mimeo (Final research report (project no.11216) to the Jubiläumsfonds der Oesterreichischen Nationalbank), p 179Google Scholar
  6. Behrens DA, Bednar-Friedl B, Getzner M (2009) Sustainable management of an Alpine national park: handling the two-edged effect of tourism. Central Europ J Oper Res 17: 233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanc R, Guillemain M, Mouronval J-P, Desmonts D, Fritz H (2006) Effects of non-consumptive leisure disturbance to wildlife. Rev Écol (Terre Vie) 61: 117–133Google Scholar
  8. Boman M, Bostedt G, Persson J (2003) The bioeconomics of the spatial distribution of an endangered species: the case of the Swedish wolf population. J Bioecon 5: 55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breitenmoser U (1998) Large predators in the Alps: the fall and rise of man’s competitors. Biol Cons 83: 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brock WA, Xepapadeas A (2004) Management of interacting species: regulation under nonlinearities and hysteresis. Resour Energy Econ 26: 137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckley R (2009) Evaluating the net effects of ecotourism on the environment: a framework, first assessment and future research. J Sustain Tour 17: 643–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bull A (2007) Oceans and coastal tourism: integrating tourism into bioeconomic models. Tour Mar Environ 4: 29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulte E, Horan RD (2003) Habitat conversion, wildlife extraction and agricultural expansion. J Environ Econ Manage 45: 109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bulte E, van Kooten GC (1999) Economics of antipoaching enforcement and the ivory trade ban. Amer J Agr Econ 81: 453–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casagrandi R, Rinaldi S (2002) A theoretical approach to tourism sustainability. Conserv Ecol 6(1): 13Google Scholar
  16. Clark JD, Huber D, Servheen C (2002) Bear reintroductions: lessons and challenges. Ursus 13: 335–345Google Scholar
  17. Conrad JM (1999) Resource economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Dharmaratne GS, Yee Sang F, Walling LJ (2000) Tourism potentials for financing protected areas. Ann Tour Res 27: 590–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duffus DA, Dearden P (1990) Non-consumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: a conceptual framework. Biol Cons 53: 213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eagles PFJ, McCool SF, Haynes CD (2002) Sustainable tourism in protected areas. World commission on protected areas (WCPA) Best practice protected area guidelines series no. 8, IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Eichner T, Tschirhart J (2007) Efficient ecosystem services and naturalness in an ecological/economic model. Environ Resour Econ 37: 733–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Union (2010) LIFE improving the conservation status of species and habitats: habitats directive article 17 report. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  23. Feichtinger G, Hartl R (1986) Optimale Kontrolle Ökonomischer Prozesse—Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. deGruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferraro PJ, Uchida T, Conrad JM (2005) Price premiums for eco-friendly commodities: are ‘green’ markets the best way to protect endangered ecosystems?.   Environ Resour Econ 32: 419–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedl B, Behrens DA (2007) Optimal balancing of recreation and wildlife conservation: a case of the Golden Eagle. In: Kontoleon A, Pascual U, Swanson T (eds) Biodiversity economics: principles, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 531Google Scholar
  26. Gaston KJ, Charman K, Jackson SF, Armsworth PR, Bonn A, Briers RA, Callaghan CSQ, Catchpole R, Hopkins J, Kunin WE, Latham J, Opdam P, Stoneman R, Stroud DA, Tratt R (2006) The ecological effectiveness of protected areas: The United Kingdom. Biol Cons 132: 76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Getzner M, Jost S, Jungmeier M (2002) Naturschutz und Regionalwirtschaft: Regionalwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen von Natura 2000-Gebieten in Österreich. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  28. Getzner M, Brendehaug E, Vik Lang M, Lane B (2012) Governance and management strategies in national parks. Int J Sust Soc (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  29. Gössling S (1999) Ecotourism: a means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Ecol Econ 29: 303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grass D, Caulkins JP, Feichtinger G, Tragler G, Behrens DA (2008) Optimal control of nonlinear processes: with applications in drugs, corruption and terror. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Grieser Johns B (1996) Responses of chimpanzees to habituation and tourism in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Biol Conserv 78: 257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanley N, Alvarez-Farizo B, Shaw WD (2002) Rationing an open-access resource: mountaineering in Scotland. Land Use Policy 19: 167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hafner F (1994) Das Steinhuhn in Kärnten. Ökologie, Verhalten und Lebensraum. Carinthia II special issue no. 52, Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, KlagenfurtGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawkins DE, Lamoureux K (2001) Global growth and magnitude of ecotourism. In: Weaver DB (eds) The encyclopedia of ecotourism. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 63–72Google Scholar
  35. Higham JES (1998) Tourists and alabtrosses: the dynamics of tourism at the Northern Royal Alabtross Colony, Taiaroa Head, New Zealand. Tour Manage 19: 521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J (2006) Evaluating effectiveness: a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. World commission on protected areas best practice protected area guidelines series No. 14, IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoekstra J, van den Bergh JCJM (2005) Harvesting and conservation in a predator-prey system. J Econ Dynam Control 29: 1097–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Honey M (1999) Ecotourism and sustainable development: who owns paradise?.   Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Horan DR, Bulte E (2004) Optimal and open access harvesting of multi-use species in a second-best world. Environ Resour Econ 28: 251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kohler Y, Heinrichs A K (2011) Catalogue of possible measures to improve ecological connectivity in the Alps. Report of AlpArc/ISCAR/CIPRA, Alpine Networks of Protected Areas, ChambéryGoogle Scholar
  41. Krüger O (2005) The role of ecotourism in conservation: panacea or Pandora’s box. Biodivers Conserv 14: 579–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lehar G, Hausberger K, Fuchs L (2004) Besucherzählung, Wertschöpfungs- und Motiverhebung im Nationalpark Hohe Tauern und im Naturpark Rieserferner-Ahrn. Studie i.A. des Nationalpark Hohe Tauern. Institut für Verkehr und Tourismus, InnsbruckGoogle Scholar
  43. Lockwood M, Worboys GL, Kothari A (eds) (2006) Managing protected areas. A global guide. Earthscan, London, SterlingGoogle Scholar
  44. Lott DF, McCoy M (1995) Asian rhinos Rhinoceros unicornis on the run? The impact of tourist visits on one population. Biol Cons 73: 23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michel P (1982) On the transversality condition in infinite horizon optimal control problems. Econometrica 50: 975–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore SA, Weiler B (2009) Tourism-protected area partnerships: stoking the fires of innovation. J Sustain Tour 17: 129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers N (1972) National parks in savannah Africa. Science 178: 1255–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Noy-Meir I (1975) Stability of grazing systems: an application of predator-prey graphs. J Ecol 63: 459–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Piga CAG (2003) Pigouvian taxtation in tourism. Environ Resour Econ 26: 343–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pontryagin LS, Boltyanskii VG, Gamkrelidze RV, Mishchenko EF (1962) The mathematical theory of optimal processes. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Ricklefs RE, Miller GL (1999) Ecology, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Rondeau D (2001) Along the way back from the brink. J Environ Econ Manage 42: 156–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenzweig A (1973) Exploitation in three trophic levels. Amer Nat 110: 431–447Google Scholar
  54. Schulz C-E, Skonhoft A (1996) Wildlife management, land-use and conflicts. Environ Devel Econ 1: 265–280Google Scholar
  55. Skonhoft A (1999) On the optimal exploitation of terrestrial animal species. Environ Resour Econ 77: 181–198Google Scholar
  56. Skonhoft (2007) Modelling the recolonisation of native species. In: Kontoleon A, Pascual U, Swanson T (eds) Biodiversity economics: principles, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 557Google Scholar
  57. Skonhoft A, Solstad JT (1996) Wildlife management, illegal hunting and conflicts. A bioeconomic analysis. Environ Devel Econ 1: 165–181Google Scholar
  58. Skonhoft A, Solstad JT (1998) The political economy of wildlife exploitation. Land Econ 74: 16–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spagnesi M (2011) Rock partridge fact sheet. World conservation union (IUCN) Italian committee. Available via: http://www.iucn.it/documenti/flora.fauna.italia/3-uccelli-2/files/Galliformes/coturnice/coturnice_gb.htm. Cited 20 May 2011
  60. Umweltkontrollbericht (2004) Seventh state of the environment report. Umweltbundesamt, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson C, Tisdell C (2001) Sea turtles as a non-consumptive tourism resource especially in Australia. Tour Manage 22: 279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgit Bednar-Friedl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Doris A. Behrens
    • 3
    • 4
  • Michael Getzner
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Wegener Center for Climate and Global ChangeUniversity of GrazGrazAustria
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria
  4. 4.Department of Mathematical Methods in EconomicsVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  5. 5.Department of Public Finance and Infrastructure PolicyVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations