Corporate Environmental Management and Environmental Efficiency
- 444 Downloads
This paper examines the potential of environmental management systems (EMSs) to provide opportunities for reducing toxic releases cost-effectively and increasing environmental efficiency of a sample of S&P 500 firms. We use directional distance function to estimate firm-specific environmental efficiency. A truncated regression model with bootstraping is then estimated to analyze the determinants of the environmental efficiency of firms. The analysis shows that the comprehensiveness of an EMS, pressures to reduce toxic releases cost-effectively, innovativeness of firms and the threat of costly regulations in the future lead firms to become more environmental efficient. Regression results indicate that increasing the comprehensiveness of EMS by adopting one additional practice benefits the average firm by approximately US$ 35.5 million by increasing its environmental efficiency by 0.3%.
KeywordsEnvironmental management systems Environmental efficiency Directional distance function Toxic releases
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Coglianese C, Nash J (2001) Environmental management systems and the new policy agenda. In: Coglianese C, Nash J (eds) Regulating from the inside: can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?. Resources for the Future, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
- Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh D, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econ 126: 469–492Google Scholar
- Florida R, Davison D (2001) Why do firms adopt advanced environmental practices (and do they make a difference)?. In: Coglianese C, Nash J (eds) Regulating from the inside: can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Hetemäki L (1996) Essays on the impact of pollution control on a firm: a distance function approach. Helsinki: The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research papers 609Google Scholar
- Khanna M (2001) Non-mandatory approaches to environmental protection. J Econ Surv 15: 291–324Google Scholar
- Nash J, Ehrenfeld J (2001) Factors that shape EMS outcomes in firms. In: Coglianese C, Nash J (eds) Regulating from the inside: can environmental management systems achieve policy goals?. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- New York Times (1991) The nation’s polluters—Who emits, what and where. October, 13, p F10Google Scholar
- Simar L, Wilson P (2007) Estimation and inference in two stage, semi-parametric models of productive efficiency. J Econ 136: 31–64Google Scholar
- Wooldridge JW (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar