Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 101–119 | Cite as

The Welfare Effects of Environmental Taxation

  • William K. Jaeger


Recent literature has investigated whether the welfare gains from environmental taxation are larger or smaller in a second-best setting than in a first-best setting. This question has mainly been addressed indirectly, by asking whether the second-best optimal environmental tax is higher or lower than the first-best Pigouvian rate. Even this indirect question has itself been approached indirectly, comparing the second-best optimal environmental tax to a proxy for its first-best value, marginal social damage (MSD). On closer examination, however, MSD becomes ambiguously defined and variable in a second-best setting making it an unreliable proxy for the Pigouvian rate. Given these observations, the current analysis reevaluates these welfare questions and finds that when compared directly to its first-best value, the second-best optimal environmental tax generally rises with increased revenue requirements. Even in cases where the second-best environmental tax is lower than its first-best value, the welfare gains may be greater than in a first-best setting. These results suggest that the marginal fiscal benefit (revenue recycling effect) exceeds the marginal fiscal cost (tax base effect) over a range of environmental tax rates that, for benchmark models, extends above the first-best Pigouvian rate. These findings reinforce the intuition that environmental policy complements rather than competes with the provision of other public goods.


Double dividend Excess burden Optimal environmental tax Pigouvian rate Revenue recycling Second-best Tax base effect Tax interaction effect 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Auerbach AJ, Hines JR Jr (2002) Taxation and economic efficiency. In: Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M (eds) Handbook of public economics, vol 3. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Boadway R, Tremblay J (2008) Pigouvian taxation in a Ramsey world. Asia Pac J Account Econ 15(3): 183–204Google Scholar
  3. Bovenberg AL, de Mooij RA (1994) Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. Am Econ Rev 94(4): 1085–1089Google Scholar
  4. Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH (1996) Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general equilibrium analysis. Am Econ Rev 86(4): 985–1000Google Scholar
  5. Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH (2002) Environmental taxation and regulation. In: Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M (eds) Handbook of public economics, vol 3, pp 1471–1545Google Scholar
  6. Bovenberg AL, van der Ploeg F (1994) Environmental policy, public finance and the labour market in a second-best world. J Public Econ 55(3): 349–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browning EK (1987) On the marginal welfare cost of taxation. Am Econ Rev 77(1): 11–23Google Scholar
  8. Cremer H, Gahvari F (2001) Second-best taxation of emissions and polluting goods. J Public Econ 80(2): 169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cremer H, Gahvari F, Ladoux N (1998) Externalities and optimal taxation. J Public Econ 70(3): 343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond PA (1985) A many-person Ramsey tax rule. J Public Econ 4(4): 335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fullerton D (1997) Environmental levies and distortionary taxation: comment. Am Econ Rev 87(1): 245–251Google Scholar
  12. Goulder LH, Parry IW, Williams RC III, Burtraw D (1999) The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. J Public Econ 72(3): 329–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howarth RB (2005) The present value criterion and environmental taxation: the sub-optimality of first-best decision rules. Land Econ 81(3): 321–336Google Scholar
  14. Jaeger WK (2002) Carbon taxation when climate affects productivity. Land Econ 78(3): 354–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaeger WK (2004) Optimal environmental taxation from society’s perspective. Am J Agric Econ 86(3): 805–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee DR, Misiolek WS (1986) Substituting pollution taxation for general taxation: some implications for efficiency in pollution taxation. J Environ Econ Manag 13(4): 228–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orosel GO, Schöb R (1996) Internalizing externalities in second-best tax systems. Public Finance 51: 242–257Google Scholar
  18. Parry IWH (1995) Pollution taxes and revenue recycling. J Environ Econ Manag 29(3): 564–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parry IWH, Bento A (2002) Revenue recycling and the welfare effects of road pricing. Scand J Econ 103: 645–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parry IWH, Oates WE (2000) Policy analysis in the presence of distorting taxes. J Policy Anal Manag 19(4): 603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearce D (1991) The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. Econ J 101: 938–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramsey FP (1927) A contribution to the theory of taxation. Econ J 37: 47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sandmo A (1975) Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities. Swed J Econ 77(1): 86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandmo A, Dreze JH (1971) Discount rates for public investment in closed and open economies. Economica 38(152): 395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schöb R (1996) Evaluating tax reforms in the presence of externalities. Oxford Econ Papers 48(4): 537–555Google Scholar
  26. Schwartz J, Repetto R (2000) Nonseparable utility and the double dividend debate: reconsidering the tax-interaction effect. Environ Resour Econ 15: 149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Terkla D (1984) The efficiency value of effluent tax revenues. J Environ Econ Manag 11(2): 107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tullock G (1967) Excess benefit. Water Resour Res 3(2): 643–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Ploeg F, Bovenberg AL (1994) Environmental policy, public goods and the marginal cost of public funds. Econ J 104: 444–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Viscusi WK (1993) The value of risks to life and health. J Econ Lit 31(4): 1912–1946Google Scholar
  31. Williams RC III (2001) Tax normalizations, the marginal cost of funds, and optimal environmental taxes. Econ Lett 71: 137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams RC III (2002) Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity. J Environ Econ Manag 44(2): 261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations