Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 139–146 | Cite as

Behavioral Economics and the Environment



  1. Asheim GB (2010) Strategic use of environmental information. Environ Resour Econo. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9353-x
  2. Bernheim BD, Rangel A (2007) Toward choice theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Am Econ Rev, Pap Proc 97: 464–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernheim BD, Rangel A (2009) Beyond revealed preference: choice theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Q J Econ 124: 51–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown G, Hagen DA (2010) Behavioral economics and the environment. Environ Resour Econ doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9357-6
  5. Carlsson F (2010) Design of stated preference surveys: is there more to learn from behavioral economics? Environ Resour Econ. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9359-4
  6. Hepburn C, Duncan S, Papachristodoulou A (2010) Behavioural economics, hyperbolic discounting and environmental policy. Environ Resour Econ doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9354-9
  7. Johansson-Stenman O, Konow J (2010) Fair air: distributive justice and environmental economics. Environ Resour Econ doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9356-7
  8. Knetsch JL (2010) Values of gains and losses: reference states and choice of measure. Environ Resour Econ doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9355-8
  9. Samuelson PA (1937) A note on the measurement of utility. Rev Eco Stud 4: 155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith VK, Moore EM (2010) Behavioral economics and benefit cost analysis doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9358-5
  11. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Sterner T, Persson UM (2008) An even sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2: 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sugden R (2009) Market simulation and the provision of public goods: a non-paternalistic response to anomalies in environmental evaluation. J Environ Econ Manag 57: 87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weitzman ML (1998) Why the far distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J Environ Econ Manag 36: 201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weitzman ML (2001) Gamma discounting. Am Econ Rev 9: 261–271Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor Emeritus of EconomicsUniversity of Washington, University Fellow, Resources for the FutureSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA

Personalised recommendations