Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 331–356 | Cite as

Estimating a socially optimal water price for irrigation versus an environmentally optimal water price through the use of Geographical Information Systems and Social Accounting Matrices

  • Esteban Castellano
  • Pablo Martínez de Anguita
  • José I Elorrieta
  • Marcelino Pellitero
  • Concepción Rey
Article

Abstract

This article develops a method for establishing water prices and their effects in order to provide policy makers an environmentally and socially optimal range of regional prices for irrigation water. Two prices are determined. The “environmentally optimal price” of water is defined as the one that internalizes the environmental costs generated by agricultural consumption. The “social optimally price” of water is defined as the one that maximizes levies on water for agriculture without affecting the regional economy. The environmentally optimal price is calculated with an economic model built over a Geographical Information System (GIS) that allows the economic quantification and valuation of the environmental cost of water in different basins. The optimal price is calculated with a demand curve for irrigation water introduced into a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) to observe if the regional economy can accept higher prices without affecting the regional GDP. Potential water prices are established, ranging from prices that minimize the negative impact in the regional economy to those that totally internalize the environmental cost of water.

Keywords

Externalities Input–Output models GIS Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Water price 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alward G, Siverts E, Taylor C and Winter S (1993). Micro INPLAN user’s guide. United Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson G (1996) Sustainable Development, Theory, Measurement and Policy. Translated into Spanish: “Recursos, Ambiente y Sociedad: Información Comercial Española,” Vol 751, MadridGoogle Scholar
  3. Azqueta D and Ferreiro A (1994). Análisis Económico y Gestión de los recursos Naturales. Alianza editorial, Madrid Google Scholar
  4. Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM and Adrian DD (1999). A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33(11): 2469–2479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beare SC, Bell R and Fisher BS (1998). Determining the value of water: the role of risk, infrastructure constraints, and Ownership. Am J Agric Econ 80(5): 916–940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becerril J, Dyer G, Taylor JE, Yúnez-Naude A (1996) Elaboración de Matrices de Contabilidad Social para poblaciones agropecuarias: El caso de El Chante, Jalisco. Documento de Trabajo, Cee. El Colegio de México, SeptiembreGoogle Scholar
  7. Berbel Vecino J, Jiménez Bolívar JF, Salas Méndez A, Gómez-Limón Rodríguez JA, Rodríguez Ocaña A (1999) Impacto de la política de precios de agua en las zonas regables y su influencia en la renta y el empleo agrario. Federación nacional de Comunidades de Regantes de España, MadridGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergstrom JC (1990). Concepts and measures of the economic value of environmental quality: a review. J Environ Manage 31: 215–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergstrom JC, Cordell GA and Watson AE (1990). Economic impact of recreational spending in rural areas: a case of study. Econ Dev Quart 4(1): 29–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briscoe J (1990). Toward equitable and sustainable rural water supplies: a contingent valuation study in Brazil. World Bank Econ Rev 4(2): 115–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulmer-Thomas V (1982). Input output analysis in developing countries. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York Google Scholar
  12. Burnash RJ, Ferral L, Mcguire RA (1973) A generalized stream flow simulation system. Conceptual modelling for digital computers. National Weather Service and California State Department of Water Resources. U.S.Google Scholar
  13. Caballer V, Guadalajara N (1998) Valoración económica del agua de Riego. Ed. Mundiprensa, MadridGoogle Scholar
  14. Cai X, McKinney DC and Lasdon LS (2003a). Integrated hydrologic-agronomic model for river management. Water Resour Plann Manage 129(1): 4–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cai X, Rosegrant MW and Ringler C (2003b). Physical and economic efficiency of water use in the river basin: implications for efficient water management. Water Resour Res 39(1): 1–12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cañas Madueño JA, López Baldovín MJ and Gómez-Limón Rodriguez JA (2000). Obtención de la curva de demanda de agua de riego generada por una hipotética política de tarifas sobre el agua. Estudios agrosociales y pesqueros 188: 67–92 Google Scholar
  17. Department of Agriculture (1999) Secretaría General Técnica. Instituto de Relaciones Agrarias. Superficies ocupadas por cultivos agrícolas en la Comunidad Foral de NavarraGoogle Scholar
  18. Desvousges WH, Kerry Smith V and Fisher A (1987). Option price estimates for water quality improvements: a contingent valuation study for the Monongahela river. J Environ Econ Manage 14: 248–267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Do TN, Bennett J (2005) An economic valuation of wetlands in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta: a case study of direct use values in Camau Province. Environmental Management and Development, APSEG ANUGoogle Scholar
  20. Elorrieta I, Castellano E (2000) Valoración Integral de la Conservación de la Biodiversidad de Navarra. Actas del Tercer Congreso de Economía NavarraGoogle Scholar
  21. Ertunga CÖ and Duckstein L (1996). Analysing water resources alternatives and handling criteria by multi criterion decision techniques. J Environ Manage 48: 69–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farber S, Costanza R and Wilson M (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 41: 375–392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Field BC (1997). Environmental economics: an introduction. 2nd edn. McGraw Hill Companies, New York Google Scholar
  24. Fletcher JE (1989). Input-output and tourism impact studies. Anna Tourism Res 16: 514–529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gisser M and Mercado A (1973). Economic aspects of ground water resources and replacement flows in semiarid agricultural areas. Am J Agric Econ 55(3): 461–466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gómez-Limón Rodríguez JA and Arriaza B (2000). Mercados locales de agua de riego. Una modelización multicriterio en el Bajo Guadalquivir. Estudios agrosociales y pesqueros 188: 135–164 Google Scholar
  27. Goulder LH, Kennedy D (1997) Valuing ecosystem services: philosophical bases and empirical methods. In: Dailey G (ed) Nature’s services. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Government of Navarra (1998a) Cuentas Económicas de la Agricultura Navarra y Comarcas. 1996. Ed. De partamento de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación. Secretaría Técnica. Serie Agraria 55. PamplonaGoogle Scholar
  29. Government of Navarra (1998b) Manual de Estadística Agraria. Navarra y Comarcas. 1987–1996. Ed. Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación. Secretaría Técnica. Serie Agraria 50. PamplonaGoogle Scholar
  30. Government of Navarra (1997) Cuentas Regionales de Navarra. 1995. Tablas Input–Output. Araldi S.L. y Servicio de Estadística del Gobierno de NavarraGoogle Scholar
  31. Gramlich FW (1977). The demand for clean water: the case of the Charles river. Nati Tax J 30(2): 183–194 Google Scholar
  32. Green CH and Tunstall SM (1991). The evaluation of river water quality improvements by the contingent valuation method. Appl Econ 23(7): 1135–1146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris BS (1984). Contingent valuation of water pollution control. J Environ Manage 3: 199–208 Google Scholar
  34. Hartmann J, Levy JK and Okada N (2005). Managing surface water contamination in nagoya, japan: an integrated water basin management decision framework. Water Resour Manage 20(3): 411–430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heng TM and Low L (1990). Economic impact of tourism in Singapore. Ann Tourism Res 17: 246–269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goesch T, Bears S (2004) Water rights and trade: meeting the water reform Agenda. Australian Commodities 11(1, March quarter): 180–189Google Scholar
  37. ITGA, Instituto Tecnico y de Gestion Agricola (2001)Resumen de Estudios Economicos, Area de Gestion. Pamplona. J Water Resour Plng Mgmt 127(4):214–223Google Scholar
  38. Khan H, Seng CF and Cheong WK (1990). Tourism multiplier effects on Singapore. Ann Tourism Res 17: 408–418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lakshminarayan PG, Bouzaher A and Shogren JF (1996). Atrazine and water quality: an evaluation of alternative policy options. J Environ Manage 48: 97–110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lant CL and Mullens JB (1991). Lake and river quality for recreation management and contingent valuation. Water Resour Bull 27(3): 453–460 Google Scholar
  41. Lee C and Wen C (1996). Application of multiobjective programming to water quality management in a river basin. J Environ Manage 33: 301–310 Google Scholar
  42. Leontief W (1966). Input–output economics. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar
  43. Loomis B, Sorg CF and Donnelly M (1986). Evaluating regional demand models for estimating recreation use and economic benefits: a case study. Water Resour Res 22(4): 434–438 Google Scholar
  44. Loomis JB (1995). Four Models for determining Environmental Quality Effects on Recreation demand and regional economics. Ecol Econ 12(1): 55–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martínez de Anguita P (1999) Introducing the environment into a Social Accounting Matrix. Masther Thesis, SUNY- ESF, Syracuse, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. McDaniels TL (1988). Comparing expressed and revealed preferences for risk reduction: different hazards and question frames. Risk Anal 8: 593–604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller RE and Blair PD (1985). Input–output analysis: foundation and Extensions. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Google Scholar
  48. Navarra de Infraestructuras Locales SA (2001) Cálculo coste m3 depurado. Presupuesto 2001 (non published)Google Scholar
  49. Owen G, Bandi M, Howell JA and Churchouse SJ (1995). Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment. J Membr Sci 102(15): 77–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resource and the environment. Johns Hopkins PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q, Saltman T and Cliff B (1997). Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience 47: 747–757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Propst D (ed) (1985) Assessing the economic impacts of recreation and tourism. Asheville NC: USDA Forest Service, South Eastern Forest Experiment StationGoogle Scholar
  53. Purvis AK, Hoehn JP and Pierce FJ (1989). Farmers response to a filter strip program: results from a contingent valuation survey. J Soil Water Conserv 44(5): 501–504 Google Scholar
  54. Pyatt G, Round JJ (eds) (1985). Social accounting matrix: a basis for planning. The World Bank, Washington Google Scholar
  55. Ringler C, Rosegrant MW and Braun J (2004). Water policy analysis for the Mekong River Basin. Water Int 29(1): 30–42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rose A, Steven B and Davis G (1988). Natural resource policy and income distribution. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore MD Google Scholar
  57. Rosegrant MW, Ringler C, McKinney DC, Cai X, Keller A and Donoso G (2000). Integrated economic-hydrologic water modelling at the basin scale: the Maipo rive basin. Agric Econ 24: 33–46 Google Scholar
  58. Sanders LD, Walsh RG and Loomis JB (1990). Toward empirical estimation of the total value of protecting rivers. Water Resour Res 26: 1345–1357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thorbecke E (1985) The Social Accounting Matrix and consistency – type planning models. In: Social Accounting Matrices: a basis for planning. World Bank Symposium, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  60. Uriel E, Beneito P, Ferri J and Moltó ML (1998). Matriz de Contabilidad Social de España 1990. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid Google Scholar
  61. Van Leeuwen A, Köbrich CG, Maino M (2001) Programación Lineal para la elaboración de escenarios óptimos de uso de la tierra. Oficina regional de la FAO para LatinoaméricaGoogle Scholar
  62. Villa F, Wilson M, Farber S, Costanza R, Boumans R and Groot RS (2002). Designing an integrated knowledge base to support ecosystem services valuation. Ecol Econ 41: 445–456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wagner JE (1997). Estimating the economic impacts of tourism. Ann Tourism Res 24(3): 592–608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson MA and Carpenter SR (1999). Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States 1971– 1997. Ecol Appl 9(3): 772–783 Google Scholar
  65. Wong L (2001) The Israeli-Palestinian Water Crisis. http://www.stanford.edu/class/e297c/war_peace/israel/hwater.htmlGoogle Scholar
  66. Yúnez Naude A, Taylor JE (1999) Manual para la elaboración de Matrices de Contabilidad Social con base en encuestas socioeconómicas aplicadas a pequeñas poblaciones rurales. Documento de trabajo. El colegio de México. Centro de estudios económicos. México D. F. No: XIV-1999Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esteban Castellano
    • 1
  • Pablo Martínez de Anguita
    • 2
  • José I Elorrieta
    • 3
  • Marcelino Pellitero
    • 1
  • Concepción Rey
    • 1
  1. 1.TRAGSATECMadridSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Rey Juan CarlosMóstoles, MadridSpain
  3. 3.Consejería de Medio AmbienteOrdenación del Territorio y ViviendaPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations