Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork
- 742 Downloads
Sales of private goods with affiliated public good attributes have markedly risen in recent years. This fact is difficult to explain within the paradigm of purely self-interested behavior. This paper investigates factors influencing consumer demand for pork products with certifications related to the environment, animal welfare, and antibiotics. Using psychometric scaling techniques, we measure individuals’ degree of altruism and propensity toward free riding. Results of a random parameter logit model applied to choice data obtained from a nationwide survey in the United States indicates that more altruistic individuals are willing to pay more for pork products with public good attributes than less altruistic individuals and free riders. These results indicate that private purchases of goods with public-good attributes are not simply a result of individuals’ perceptions of the ability to mitigate private risks such as food safety, but that individuals are making private choices to affect public outcomes. Results have implications for policy makers weighing the relative costs and benefits of food labeling policies versus bans related to certain livestock production practices.
KeywordsPublic Good Marginal Utility Private Good Public Economic Public Good Provision
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors would like to thank Tim Cason and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of the paper.
- Andreoni J. (1993) An Experimental Test of the Public-Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis. American Economic Review 83:1317–1327Google Scholar
- Andreoni J. (1995) Cooperation in Public-Good Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?. American Economic Review 85:8981–8904Google Scholar
- Buhr B. L., Hayes D. J., Shogren J. F., Kliebenstein J. B. (1993) Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers. Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 18:175–184Google Scholar
- Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). CSPI Newsroom. ‘Consumer Group Urges FDA to Take Swift Action to Protect Effectiveness of Antibiotics.’ May 19, 1999Google Scholar
- England P. (1989) A Feminist Critique of Rational-Choice Theories: Implications for Sociology. American Sociologist 20:14–28Google Scholar
- Ledyard, J. O. (1995), ‘Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research’, in J. H. Kages and A. E. Roth, eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
- Likert, R. A. (1932), ‘Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes’, Archives of Psychology 140 Google Scholar
- Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- McFadden D. (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P. (eds), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142Google Scholar
- Nunnaly, J. C. and I. H. Bernstein (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd Edition. New York: McCraw-HillGoogle Scholar
- Roberts J.A. (1995) Profiling Levels of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 3:97–118Google Scholar
- Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Webb D. J., Green C. L., Brashear T. G. (2000) Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28:299–309Google Scholar