Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 499–521 | Cite as

Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork

  • Jayson L. Lusk
  • Tomas Nilsson
  • Ken Foster


Sales of private goods with affiliated public good attributes have markedly risen in recent years. This fact is difficult to explain within the paradigm of purely self-interested behavior. This paper investigates factors influencing consumer demand for pork products with certifications related to the environment, animal welfare, and antibiotics. Using psychometric scaling techniques, we measure individuals’ degree of altruism and propensity toward free riding. Results of a random parameter logit model applied to choice data obtained from a nationwide survey in the United States indicates that more altruistic individuals are willing to pay more for pork products with public good attributes than less altruistic individuals and free riders. These results indicate that private purchases of goods with public-good attributes are not simply a result of individuals’ perceptions of the ability to mitigate private risks such as food safety, but that individuals are making private choices to affect public outcomes. Results have implications for policy makers weighing the relative costs and benefits of food labeling policies versus bans related to certain livestock production practices.


Public Good Marginal Utility Private Good Public Economic Public Good Provision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to thank Tim Cason and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of the paper.


  1. Adamowicz W., Boxall R., Williams M., Louviere J. (1998) Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson W. T., Cunningham W. H. (1972) The Socially Conscious Consumer. Journal of Marketing 36:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson S. P., Goeree J. K., Holt C. A. (1998) A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Good Games. Journal of Public Economics 70:297–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreoni J. (1990) Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal 100:464–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreoni J. (1993) An Experimental Test of the Public-Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis. American Economic Review 83:1317–1327Google Scholar
  6. Andreoni J. (1995) Cooperation in Public-Good Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?. American Economic Review 85:8981–8904Google Scholar
  7. Andreoni J., Petrie R. (2004) Public Goods Experiments Without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-Raising. Journal of Public Economics 88:1605-1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bagnoli M., Watts S. G. (2003) Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12:419–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker R., Henderson V. (2000) Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries. Journal of Political Economy 108:379–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergstrom T. C., Blume L. E., Varian H. R. (1986) On the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Public Economics. 29:25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchflower D. G., Oswald A. J. (2004) Well-being Over Time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88:1359–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown-Kruse J., Hummel D. (1993) Gender Effects in Laboratory Public Good Contributions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buhr B. L., Hayes D. J., Shogren J. F., Kliebenstein J. B. (1993) Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers. Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 18:175–184Google Scholar
  14. Cason T.N., Gangadharan L. (2002) Environmental Labeling and Incomplete Consumer Information in Laboratory Markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 :113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlsson F., Martinsson P. (2001) Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41:179-192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). CSPI Newsroom. ‘Consumer Group Urges FDA to Take Swift Action to Protect Effectiveness of Antibiotics.’ May 19, 1999Google Scholar
  17. Churchill G. A. (1979) A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Tella R., MacCulloch R., Oswald A. J. (2001) Preferences Over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness. American Economic Review 91:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. England P. (1989) A Feminist Critique of Rational-Choice Theories: Implications for Sociology. American Sociologist 20:14–28Google Scholar
  20. Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. (2000) Fairness, Incentives, and Contractual Choices. European Economic Review 44:1057-1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox J. A., Shogren J. F., Hayes D. J., Kliebenstein J. B. (1998) CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goeree J. K., Holt C. A., Laury S.K. (2002) Private Costs and Public Benefits: Unraveling the Effects of Altruism and Noisy Behavior. Journal of Public Economics 83:255–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamilton S. F., Sunding D. L., Zilberman D. (2003) Public Goods and the Value of Product Quality Regulations: The Case of Food Safety. Journal of Public Economics 87:799–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hindriks J., Pancs R. (2002) Free Riding on Altruism and Group Size. Journal of Public Economic Theory 4:335–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Isaac R. M., McCue K., Plott C. (1985) Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment. Journal of Public Economics 26:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Isaac R. M., Walker J., Thomas S. (1984) Divergent Evidence on Free Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations. Public Choice 43:113–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jayne T. S., Rubey L., Lupi F., Tschirley D., Weber M. T. (1996) Estimating Consumer Response to Food Market Reform Using Stated Preference Data: Evidence from Eastern and Southern Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 820–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krinsky I., Robb A. L. (1986) On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics. 64:715–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Layton D. F., Brown G. (2000) Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82:616–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ledyard, J. O. (1995), ‘Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research’, in J. H. Kages and A. E. Roth, eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Likert, R. A. (1932), ‘Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes’, Archives of Psychology 140 Google Scholar
  32. List J. A., Gallet C. A. (2001) What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?. Environmental and Resource Economics 20:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Lusk J.L., Roosen J., Fox J.A. (2003) Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lusk J. L., Schroeder T. C. (2004) Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marwell G., Ames R. (1979) Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods I: Resources, Interest, Groups Size, and the Free-Rider Problem. American Journal of Sociology 84:1335–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marwell G., Ames R. (1981) Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Public Economics 15:295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McFadden D. (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P. (eds), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142Google Scholar
  39. Nunnaly, J. C. and I. H. Bernstein (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd Edition. New York: McCraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  40. Parkhurst G., Shogren J. F., Dickinson D. L. (2004) Negative Values in Vickrey Auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86:222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pecotich A., Hattie J., Low L. P. (1999) Development of Industruct: A Scale for the Measurement of Perceptions of Industry Structure. Marketing Letters 10:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pennings J. M. E., Garcia P. (2001) Measuring Producers’ Risk Preferences: A Global Risk Attitude Construct. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83:993–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pennings J. M. E., Smidts A. (2000) Assessing the Construct Validity of Risk Attitude. Management Science 46:1337–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pennings J. M. E., Wansink B., Meulenberg M. T. G. (2002) A Note on Modeling Consumer Reactions to a Crisis: The Case of the Mad Cow Disease. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Revelt D., Train K. (1998) Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. The Review of Economics and Statistics 80:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts J.A. (1995) Profiling Levels of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 3:97–118Google Scholar
  47. Rushton J.P., Chrisjohn R.D., Fekken C.G. (1981) The Altruistic Personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality & Individual Differences 2:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith V. H., Kehoe M. R., Cremer M. E. (1995) The Private Provision of Public Goods: Altruism and Voluntary Giving. Journal of Public Economics 58:107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Teisl M. F., Roe B., Hicks R. L. (2002) Can Eco-labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43:339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thurstone L .L. (1927) Psychological Analysis. American Journal of Psychology 38:368–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Train K.E. (1998) Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People. Land Economics 74:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webb D. J., Green C. L., Brashear T. G. (2000) Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28:299–309Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Rural EconomyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural EconomicsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations