Agrobiodiversity is a crucial environmental resource. Much of the agrobiodiversity remaining in situ today is found on the semi-subsistence farms of poorer countries and the small-scale farms or home gardens of more industrialised nations. The traditional farms of Hungary are an example. Labelled “home gardens” as a reflection of their institutional identity during the collectivisation period, they are micro-agroecosystems that provide important functions such as food security and diet quality. This paper applies the choice experiment method to estimate the private benefits farmers derive from four components of the agrobiodiversity found in Hungarian home gardens: richness of crop varieties and fruit trees; crop landraces; integrated crop and livestock production; and soil micro-organism diversity. The analysis is based on primary data collected in three environmentally sensitive areas where pilot agri-environmental programmes have been initiated as part of the Hungarian National Rural Development Plan. Findings demonstrate variation in the private values of home gardens and their attributes across households and regions, contributing to understanding the potential role of home gardens in these agri-environmental schemes. This study has implications for sustaining agrobiodiversity in transitional economies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Common Agricultural Policy
Environmentally Sensitive Area
National Agri-Environmental Programme
National Rural Development Plan
willingness to accept
willingness to pay
I. J. Bateman, R. T. Carson, B. Day, W. M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Ozdemiroglu, D. W. Pearce, R. Sugden and S. Swanson, Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (2003).
M. Ben-Akiva and S. R. Lerman, Discrete Choice Analysis, Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press (1985).
W. S. Breffle and E. R. Morey, Investigating Preference Heterogeneity in a Repeated Discrete-Choice Recreation Demand Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing. Marine Resource Economics 15 (2000) 1-20
H. Brookfield, Exploring Agrodiversity. New York: Columbia University Press (2001).
H. Brookfield, C. Padoch, H. Parsons and M. Stocking, Cultivating Biodiversity: Understanding, Analysing and Using Agricultural Diversity. London: The United Nations University, ITDG Publishing (2002).
H. Brookfield and M. Stocking, Agrodiversity: Definition, Description and Design. Global Environmental Change 9 (1999) 77-80
Convention on Biological Diversity (2002), Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Environment Programme http://www.biodiv.org/programmes/areas/agro
R. Dhar, Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (1997) 215-231
FAO (1999), ‘Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land’. Conference Background Paper No. 1, Maastricht. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
Fertö, I., Cs. Fogács, A. Juhász and Gy. Kürhty (2004), Regoverning Markets, Country report. Budapest, Hungary. http://www.regoverningmarkets.org/docs/country−study−Hungary− new2005.pdf
Fischler, F. (2003), ‘Opportunities in an Enlarged Europe’. Paper presented at the 16th European Industry Strategy Symposium, February 10, 2003, Villach
A. M. Freeman, The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future (2002).
S. Furey, C. Strugnell and H. McIlveen, An investigation of the potential existence of “food deserts” in rural and urban areas of Northern Ireland. Agriculture and Human Values 18 (2001) 447-457
G. D. Garrod, R. Scarpa and K. G. Willis, Estimating the Benefits of Traffic Calming on Through Routes: A Choice Experiment Approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36 (2002) 211-231
W. H. Greene, Econometric Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall (1997).
Á. Gyovai, Site and Sample Selection for Analysis of Crop Diversity on Hungarian Small Farms. In: M. Smale, I. Már and D. I. Jarvis (eds.) The Economics of Conserving Agrobiodiversity On-Farm: Research Methods Developed from IPGRI’s Global Project ‘Strengthening the Scientific Basis of In Situ Conservation of Agrobiodiversity. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (2002) pp. 44-74
N. Hanley, R. E. Wright and W. L. Adamowicz, Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environmental. Environmental and Resource Economics 11 (1998) 413-428
I. Harcsa, I. Kovách and I. Szelényi, A posztszocialista átalakulási válság a mezögazdaságban és a falusi társadalomban (Postsocialist Transitional Crisis in Agriculture and Rural Society). Szociológiai Szemle 3 (1994) 15-43
J. A. Hausman and D. McFadden, Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model. Econometrica 52 (1984) 1219-1240
D. A. Hensher and L. W. Johnson, Applied Discrete Choice Modelling. London: Croom-Helm (1981).
P. Horne and L. Petäjistö, Preferences for Alternative Moose Management Regimes among Finnish Landowners: A Choice Experiment Approach. Land Economics 79 (2003) 472-482
Huber, J and J. Pinnell (1994), The Impact of Set Quality and Choice Difficulty on the Decision to Defer Purchase. Working paper, Duke University: The Fuqua School of Business
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) (2001), TSTAR Database. Budapest
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) (2002), (2003), Budapest. http://www.ksh.hu/pls/ksh/docs/index−eng.html
Home Gardens and the In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (2003).
I. Juhász, J. ÁngyÁn, I. Fesüs, L. Podmaniczky, F. Tar and A. Madarassy, National Agri-Environment Programme: For the Support of Environmentally Friendly Agricultural Production Methods Ensuring the Protection of the Nature and the Preservation of the Landscape. Budapest: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Agri-Environmental Studies (2000).
D. Kahneman, J. Knetsch and R. Thaler, Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 1325-1348
I. Kovách, Hungary: Cooperative Farms and Household Plots. In: M. Meurs (ed.) Many Shades of Red: State Policy and Collective Agriculture. Boulder: Rowman and Littlefield (1999) pp.
K. Lancaster, A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy 84 (1966) 132-157
Multifunctional Character of Agriculture. Agricultural Economics Research Institute: Helsinki (2000).
D. Luce, Individual Choice Behaviour. New York: John Wiley (1959).
Lupwayi, N., W. Rick and G. Clayton (1997), ‘Zillions of Lives Underground’, APGC Newsletter, http://www.pulse.ab.ca/newsletter/97fall/zillion.html
G. S. Maddala, Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999).
G. S. Maddala, Introduction to Econometrics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (2000).
P. Mäder, A. Fliessbach, D. Dubois, L. Gunst, P. Fried and U. Niggli, Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming. Science 296 (2002) 1694-1697
I. Már, Safeguarding Agrobiodiversity On-farms in Hungary. In: M. Smale, I. Már and D. I. Jarvis (eds.) The Economics of Conserving Agrobiodiversity On-Farm: Research Methods Developed from IPGRI’s Global Project ‘Strengthening the Scientific Basis of In Situ Conservation of Agrobiodiversity. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (2002) pp. 41-43
I. Már and A. Juhász, A tájtermesztésben hasznosítható bab (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) egyensúlyi populációk agrobotanikai vizsgálata (Agrobotanical analysis of bean - Phaseolus vulgaris L. – equilibrium populations suitable for regional land cultivation). Acta Agraria Debreceniensis. Hungary: University of Debrecen (2002).
D. McFadden, Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. In: P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press (1974) pp.
M. Meurs, The Evolution of Agrarian Institutions: A Comparative Study of Post-Socialist Hungary and Bulgaria. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (2001).
Ministry of Transport Water (2001), Road Department: Main Data on Roads. Budapest, Hungary
E. R. Morey and K. G. Rossmann, Using Stated-Preference Questions to Investigate Variations in Willingness to Pay for Preserving Marble Monuments: Classic Heterogeneity, Random Parameters, and Mixture Models. Journal of Cultural Economics 27 (2003) 205-229
National Labour Centre (2000), Budapest. http://www.ikm.iif.hu/english/economy/labour.htm
J. Ndjeunga and C. H. Nelson, Toward Understanding Household Preference for Consumption Characteristics of Millet Varieties: A Case Study from Western Niger. Agricultural Economics 32 (2005) 151-165
Orbánné Nagy M. (2003), ‘Az élelmiszerfogyasztás és a fogyasztói árak konvergenciája Magyarország és az EU között’. AKII, Hungary. http://www.akii.hu/kiadvany/intezeti− kiadvanyok/magyar/AKII−TANULMANYOSSZEFOGLALOK/2003–5 Orbanne.htm
Petrick, M. and E. Tyran (2001), ‘Development Perspectives of Subsistence Farms in South-Eastern Poland: Social Buffer Stock or Commercial Agriculture?’, Paper presented at the 76th EAAE Seminar ‘Subsistence Agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe: How to Break the Vicious Circle?’, May 6–8, 2001, Halle (Saale)
D. Revelt and K. Train, Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choice of Appliance Efficiency Level. Review of Economics and Statistics 53 (1998) 647-657
M. Rizov and E. Mathijs, Farm Survival and Growth in Transition Economies: Empirical Evidence from Hungary. Post-Communist Economies 15 (2003) 227-242
J. Rolfe, J. J. Bennett and J. Louviere, Choice Modelling and Its Potential Application to Tropical Rainforest Preservation. Ecological Economics 35 (2000) 289-302
Romstad, E., A. Vatn, P. K. Rørstad and V. Søyland (2000), Multifunctional Agriculture: Implications for Policy Design. Department of Economics and Social Sciences Report No. 21. Oslo: Agricultural University of Norway
A. H. Sarris, T. Doucha and E. Mathijs, Agricultural Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications for Competitiveness and Rural Development. European Review of Agricultural Economics 26 (1999) 305-329
R. Scarpa, A. Drucker, S. Anderson, N. Ferraes-Ehuan, V. Gomez, C. R. Risopatron and O. Rubio-Leonel, Valuing Animal Genetic Resources in Peasant Economies: The Case of the Box Keken Creole Pig in Yucatan. Ecological Economics 45 (2003a) 427-443
R. Scarpa, P. Kristjanson, A. Drucker, M. Radeny, E. S. K. Ruto and J. E. O. Rege, Valuing Indigenous Cattle Breeds in Kenya: An Empirical Comparison of Stated and Revealed Preference Value Estimates. Ecological Economics 45 (2003b) 409-426
H. T. Seeth, S. Chachnov, A. Surinov and J. Braun von, Russian Poverty: Muddling Through Economic Transition with Garden Plots. World Development 26 (1998) 1611-1623
Management of Békés County. Béksécsaba: HSCO (2001a).
Management of Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County. Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok: HSCO (2001b).
Management of Vas County. Szombathely: HSCO (2001c).
Management of Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County. Nyíregyháza: HSCO (2001d).
Swain, N. (2000), ‘Post-Socialist Rural Economy and Society in the CEECs: the Socio-Economic Contest for SAPARD and EU Enlargement’. Paper presented at the International Conference ‘European Rural Policy at the Crossroads’, June 29 –July 1, 2000, The Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Scotland
Privatising the Land: Rural Political Economy in Post-communist Societies. New York: Routledge (1998).
K. Szép, The Chance of Agricultural Work in the Competition for Time: Case of Household Plots in Hungary. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe 22 (2000) 95-106
Szivós, P. and I. G. Tóth (2003), Stabilization of the Structure of Society (Stabilizálódó társadalomszerkezet). TáRKI MONITOR Reports
K. E. Train, Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People. Land Economics 74 (1998) 230-239
Vajda, L. (2003), The View from Central and Eastern Europe. Washington D.C.: Agricultural Outlook Forum 2003. http://www.usda.gov/oce/waob/oc2003/speeches/vajda.pdf
Weingarten, P., S. Baum, K. Frohberg, M. Hartmann and A. Matthews (2004), The Future of Rural Areas in the CEE New Member States. Report prepared by the Network of Independent Agricultural Experts in the CEE Candidate Countries. http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/publi/reports/ccrurdev/text_en.pdf
WHO (2000) The Impact of Food and Nutrition on Public Health: The Case for a Food and Nutrition Policy and An Action Plan for the European Region of WHO, 2000–2005 and the Draft Urban Food and Nutrition Action Plan. http://www.hospitalitywales.demon.co.uk/nyfaweb/fap4fnp/fap_26.htm. http://www.hospitalitywales.demon.co.uk/nyfaweb/urban/urb_02.htm
Wyzan, M. (1996), ‘Increased Inequality, Poverty Accompany Economic Transition’, Transition, 2(20). http://archive.tol.cz/Publications/Transition/Features/Feature.V02N20-Wyzan.html
About this article
Cite this article
Birol, E., Smale, M. & Gyovai, Á. Using a Choice Experiment to Estimate Farmers’ Valuation of Agrobiodiversity on Hungarian Small Farms. Environ Resource Econ 34, 439–469 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-0009-9
- choice experiment
- home gardens
- choice experiment
- home gardens