Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 347–369 | Cite as

Choosing Children’s Environmental Risk

  • David W. Archer
  • Thomas D. Crocker
  • Jason F. Shogren
Article

Abstract

A model of endogenous risk provides a foundation to study a parent’s child care decisions when the child could be exposed to an environmental hazard (e.g., toxic substance, foodborne pathogen). The parent invests in childcare quality and quantity to reduce the likelihood of a hazard exposure occurring and to reduce its severity if the exposure is realized. We supply conditions to sign unambiguously the effects on a child’s hazard exposure of an increased probability a parent fails to access or have command over a technique of exposure prevention or that a technique is ineffective in preventing exposure. Also, we consider these effects when the parent is unsure what a technique can do to reduce the child’s probability of exposure. We conclude public policies designed to encourage use of a particular childcare technique, if childcare quality and quantity are stochastic substitutes, can reduce parental use of other techniques. The net impact of the policy could increase the chance the child suffers.

Keywords

childcare quality childcare quantity stochastic substitution 

JEL Classifications

D10 D80 J13 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agee, M. D., Crocker, T. D. 1994‘Parental and Social Valuations of Child Health Information’Journal of Public Economics5589105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agee, M. D., Crocker, T. D. 1996‘Parental Altruism and Child Lead Exposure’Journal of Human Resources31677691Google Scholar
  3. Antle, J. 1983‘Incorporating Risk in Production Analysis’American Journal of Agricultural Economics6510991106Google Scholar
  4. Archer, D., Shogren, J. 1996‘Endogenous Risk in Weed Control Management’Agricultural Economics14103122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow, K. J. 1984Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow: Individual Choice under Certainty and UncertaintyThe Belknap Press of Harvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Athey, S. 2002‘Monotone Comparative Statics under Uncertainty’Quarterly Journal of Economics117187223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton, S., Kates, R., White, G. 1979The Environment as HazardOxford University PressNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Bureau of the Census1998Statistical Abstract of the United StatesU.S. Department of CommerceWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Camerer, C., Weber, M. 1992‘Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity’Journal of Risk and Uncertainty5325370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers, R., Quiggin, J. 2000Uncertainty, Production, Choice and Agency: The State Contingent ApproachCambridge University PressNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Courbage, C. 2001‘Self-Insurance, Self-Protection and Market Insurance within the Dual Theory of Choice’Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory264356Google Scholar
  12. Crocker, T. D., Shogren, J. F. 1998Endogenous Risk and Environmental Program EvaluationKim, T. J.Knaap, G. H. eds. Environmental Program Evaluation: A PrimerUniversity of Illinois PressUrbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  13. Currie, J., Reagan, P. 2003‘Distance to Hospital and Children’s Use of Preventive Care: Is Being Closer Better and for Whom?’Economic Inquiry41378391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dafny, L., Gruber, J. 2005‘Public Insurance and Child Hospitalizations: Access and Efficiency Effects’Journal of Public Economics89109129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finetti, D. 1974Theory of ProbabilityJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Dionne, G., Eckhoudt, L. 1985‘Self-Insurance, Self-Protection, and Increased Risk Aversion’Economics Letters173942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich, I., Becker, G. S. 1972‘Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection’Journal of Political Economy80623648Google Scholar
  18. Fisher, A. C., Narain, U. 2003‘Global Warning, Endogenous Risk, and Irreversibility’Environmental and Resource Economics25395416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham, D. A. 1992‘Public Expenditure Under Uncertainty: The Net Benefit Criteria’The American Economic Review82822846Google Scholar
  20. Grossman, M. (1999), The Human Capital Model of the Demand for Health. Working Paper 7078. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  21. Haritchabalet, C. 2000‘The Production of Goods in Excess of Demand: A Generalization of Self-Protection’Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory355163Google Scholar
  22. Hiebert, L. D. 1983‘Self-Insurance, Self-Protection, and the Theory of the Competitive Firm’Southern Economic Journal50160168Google Scholar
  23. Kates, R. 1978Risk Assessment of Environmental HazardJohn Wiley & SonsNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumbhakar, S., Lovell, C. 2000Stochastic Frontier AnalysisCambridge University PressNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, L.-F., Frost, R. 1978‘Estimation of Some Limited Dependent Variable Models with Application to Housing Demand’Journal of Econometrics8357382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lichtenberg, E., Zilberman, D. 1986‘The Econometrics of Damage Control: Why Specification Matters’American Journal of Agricultural Economics68261273Google Scholar
  27. Mukerji, S. 1998‘Ambiguity Aversion and Incompleteness of Contractual Form’American Economic Review8812071231Google Scholar
  28. Quiggin, J. 1992‘Risk, Self-Protection, and Ex Ante Economic Value – Some Positive Results’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management234053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quiggin, J. 2003‘Risk and Self-Protection: A State Contingent View’Journal of Risk and Uncertainty24133145Google Scholar
  30. Shogren, J. F. 1991‘Endogenous Risk and Protection Premiums’Theory and Decision31241256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shogren, J. F. 2001‘Children and the Environment: Valuing Indirect Effects on a Child’s Life Chances’Contemporary Economic Policy19382396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shogren, J. F., Crocker, T. D. 1991‘Risk, Self-Protection, and Ex Ante Economic Value’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management20115Google Scholar
  33. Shogren, J. F., Crocker, T. D. 1999‘Risk and Its Consequences’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management374451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silberburg, E. 1978The Structure of Economics: A Mathematical AnalysisMcGrew-Hill Book CompanyNew York, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Sweeney, G. H., Beard, T. R. 1992‘The Comparative Statics of Self-Protection’Journal of Risk and Insurance59301309Google Scholar
  36. Tamburlini, G. (2003), ‘Overview of the Risk Differences between Adults and Children’, A paper presented at the Workshop on the Valuation of Children’s Health, Paris, France, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Sept. 11–12.Google Scholar
  37. Topkis, D. 1998Supermodularity and ComplementarityPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
  38. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998), Risk Analysis to Support Standards for Lead in Paint, Dust, and Soil. Washington, DC: EPA 747-R-97-006, June.Google Scholar
  39. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999), Background Document from the Economics and Assessment Work Group (EAWG), Children’s Health Protection Advisory Committee. Office of Children’s Health Protection, December 7, http://www.epa.gov/children/whatwe/recomm/bckgrnd.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Archer
    • 1
  • Thomas D. Crocker
    • 2
  • Jason F. Shogren
    • 2
  1. 1.North Central Soil Conservation Research LaboratoryUSDA-Agricultural Research ServiceMorrisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations