Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Permit Markets to Stabilize Prices

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The political economy of environmental policy favors the use of quantity-based instruments over price-based instruments (e.g., tradable permits over green taxes), at least in the United States. With cost uncertainty, however, there are clear efficiency advantages to prices in cases where the marginal damages of emissions are relatively flat, such as with greenhouse gases. The question arises, therefore, of whether one can design flexible quantity policies that mimic the behavior of price policies, namely stable permit prices and abatement costs. We explore a number of “quantity-plus” policies that replicate the behavior of a price policy through rules that adjust the effective permit cap for unexpectedly low or high costs. They do so without necessitating any monetary exchanges between the government and the regulated firms, which can be a significant political barrier to the use of price instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. J. Barro D. B. Gordon (1983) ArticleTitle‘A positive Theory of Monetary Policy in a Natural Rate Model’ Journal of Political Economy 91 IssueID4 589–610 Occurrence Handle10.1086/261167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. B. Cronshaw J. B. Kruse (1996) ArticleTitle‘Regulated Firms in Pollution Permit Markets with Banking’ Journal of Regulatory Economics 9 179–189 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00240369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.G. Haubrich J.A. Ritter (2000) ArticleTitle‘Dynamic Commitment and Incomplete Policy Rules’ Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 32 IssueID4 766–784 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2601182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Hoel L. Karp (2002) ArticleTitle‘Taxes versus Quotas for a Stock Pollutant’ Resource and Energy Economics 24 367–384 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0928-7655(02)00014-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. O. Keohane R. L. Revesz et al. (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy’ Harvard Environmental Law Review 22 313–367

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Kling J. Rubin (1997) ArticleTitle‘Bankable Permits for the Control of Environmental, Pollution’ Journal of Public Economics 64 IssueID1 101–115 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01600-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. E. Kydland E. C. Prescott (1977) ArticleTitle‘Rules rather than discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans’ Journal of Political Economy 85 IssueID3 473–491 Occurrence Handle10.1086/260580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Leiby J. Rubin (2001) ArticleTitle‘Intertemporal Permit Trading for the Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions’ Environmental and Resource Economics 19 229–256 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011124215404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKibbin, W. J., M. Ross, et al. (1999), ‘Emissions Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol’,Energy Journal, special issue.

  • R. Newell W. Pizer (2003) ArticleTitle‘Regulating Stock Externalities Under Uncertainty’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 416–432 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00016-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Phaneuf T. Requate (2002) ArticleTitle‘Incentives for Investment in Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology in Emission Permit Markets with Banking’ Environmental and Resource Economics 22 369–390 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016097000190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Requate (2002) Does the Environment Benefit from Banking Programs for Tradable Permits? Manuscript University of Kiel Kiel, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Roberts M. Spence (1976) ArticleTitle‘Effluent Charges and Licenses Under Uncertainty’ Journal of Public Economics 5 IssueID3–4 193–208 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(76)90014-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Rubin C. Kling (1993) ArticleTitle‘An Emission Saved is an Emission Earned: An Empirical Study of Emission Banking for Light-Duty Vehicle Manufacturers’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 257–274 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1993.1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Rubin (1996) ArticleTitle‘A Model of Intertemporal Emision Trading, Banking, and Borrowing’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 269–286 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1996.0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.M. Schennach (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Economics of Pollution Permit Banking in the Context of Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40 IssueID3 189–210 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1999.1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2000), Procedures and Mechanisms Relating to Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol: Note by the co-Chairmen of the Joint Working Group on Compliance. Bonn, UNFCCC.

  • M.L. Weitzman (1974) ArticleTitle‘Prices vs Quantities’ Review of Economic Studies 41 IssueID4 477–491 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2296698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. L. Weitzman (1978) ArticleTitle‘Optimal Rewards for Economic Regulation’ American Economic Review 68 IssueID4 683–691

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wiener (1998) ArticleTitle‘Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context’ Yale Law Journal 677 108

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Williams SuffixIII (2001) Price vs Quantities vs. Tradable Quantities. Manuscript University of Texas Austin TX

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Yates M. B. Cronshaw (2001) ArticleTitle‘Pollution Permit Markets with Intertemporal trading and Assymetric Information’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42 104–118 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.2000.1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. W. Yohe (1978) ArticleTitle‘Towards a General Comparison of Price Controls and Quantity Controls under Uncertainty’ The Review of Economic Studies 45 IssueID2 229–38 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2297337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Newell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell, R., Pizer, W. & Zhang, J. Managing Permit Markets to Stabilize Prices. Environ Resource Econ 31, 133–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-1761-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-1761-y

Keywords

JEL classifications

Navigation