Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 253–274 | Cite as

Green Tax Reform in an Oligopolistic Industry

  • Hajime Sugeta
  • Shigeru Matsumoto


OECD countries reduce or eliminate certain taxes when they introduce new environmental taxes. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the incidence of such green tax reform in an oligopolistic industry. The paper shows that a rise in taxes could result in the expansion of the aggregate pollution in the presence of a large technology gap. The paper further shows that the government loses tax revenue as a result of the green tax reform if it continues to apply the same environmental standard. This implies that the government needs to raise environmental standards to keep the existing level of public spending after a green tax reform.


environmental standard green tax reform oligopolistic conjecture tax revenue 

JEL classifications

H2 D43 Q2 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett, A. H. 1980‘The Pigouvian Tax Rule under Monopoly’American Economic Review7010371041Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, S. 1994‘Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade’Journal of Public Economics54325338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumol, W. J., Oates, W. E. 1988The Theory of Environmental Policy2Cambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bovenberg, L. A., Goulder, L. H. 1996‘Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes’American Economic Review869851000Google Scholar
  5. Bovenberg, L. A., Goulder, L. H. 2001‘Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies, What Does It Costs?’Carraro, C.Metcalfe, G. E. eds. Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental PolicyNational Bureau of Economic ResearchChicago4589Google Scholar
  6. Bovenberg, L. A., Mooij, R. A. 1994‘Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation’American Economic Review8410851089Google Scholar
  7. Carlsson, F. 2000‘Environmental Taxation and Strategic Commitment in Duopoly Models’Environmental and Resource Economics15243256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrad, K. 1993‘Taxes and Subsidies for Pollution Intensive Industries as Trade Policy’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management25121135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damania, R. 1996‘Pollution Taxes and Pollution Abatement in an Oligopoly Supergame’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management30232336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Damania, R. 2000‘Financial Structure and the Effectiveness of Pollution Control in an Oligopolistic Industry’Resource and Energy Economics222136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delipalla, S., Keen, M. 1992‘The Comparison between Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation under Imperfect Competition’Journal of Public Economics49351367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dierickx, I., Matutes, C., Neven, D. 1988‘Indirect Taxation and Cournot Equilibrium’International Journal of Industrial Organization6385399Google Scholar
  13. Dixit, A. 1986‘Comparative Statics for Oligopoly’International Economic Review27107122Google Scholar
  14. Dung, T. H. 1993‘Optimal Taxation and Heterogeneo us Oligopoly’Canadian Journal of Economics26933947Google Scholar
  15. Gaudet, G., Salant, S. W. 1991‘Increasing Profits of a Subset of Firms in Oligopoly Models with Strategic Substitutes’American Economic Review81658665Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, S. F. 1999‘Tax Incidence under Oligopoly: A Comparison of Policy Approaches’Journal of Public Economics71233245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katsoulacos, Y., Xepapadeas, A. 1995‘Environmental Policy under Oligopoly with Endogenous Market Structure’Scandinavian Journal of Economics97411420Google Scholar
  18. Kimmel, S. 1992‘Effects of Cost Changes on Oligopolists’ Profits’Journal of Industrial Economics40441449Google Scholar
  19. Lahiri, S., Ono, Y. 1988‘Helping Minor Firms Reduces Welfare’Economic Journal9811991202Google Scholar
  20. Levin, D. 1985‘Taxation within Cournot Oligopoly’Journal of Public Economics27281290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD1997Evaluating Economic Instruments for Environmental PolicyOECDParisGoogle Scholar
  22. OECD1999Economic Instruments for Pollution Control and Natural Resources Management in OECD Countries: A SurveyWorking Party on Economic and Environmental Policy Integration OECDParisGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD2001Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries: Issues and StrategiesOECDParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Seade, J. 1980‘On the Effects of Entry’Econometrica48479489Google Scholar
  25. Simpson, R. D. 1995‘Optimal Pollution Taxation in a Cournot Duopoly’Environmental and Resource Economics6359369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spulber, D. F. 1985‘Effluent Regulation and Long-Run Optimality’Journal of Environmental Economics and Management12103116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulph, A. 1992‘The Choice of Environmental Policy Instruments and Strategic International Trade’Pethig, R. eds. Conflict and Cooperation in Managing Strategic International TradeSpringer-VerlagBerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsKansai UniversitySuita-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations