This research aims to reveal factors affecting Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) integration in learning environments in Turkey. The meta-synthesis method is used to make in-depth analysis and to interpret qualitative research findings on this issue. Through inclusion and exclusion criteria, 60 studies among 907 candidate studies accessed from databases named Web of Science, Education Resource Information Center (ERIC) and the Turkish Academic Network and Information Center (ULAKBIM) are included in this research. As a result of analyses, it is revealed that ICT integration into learning environments in Turkey is affected by five factors; students, educational material, infrastructure, management, and teachers. Considering these factors, it has been found that certain factors become prominent namely: the ICT and pedagogy competence of teachers; students’ ICT competence; a lack of technical equipment and technical support; a lack of educational materials; the attitudes of school administrators; and the quality and lack of in-service training for ICT. It is concluded that the factors affecting the ICT integration in education are directly or indirectly related to each other, and that ICT integration should be addressed with all its stakeholders and phases as a whole.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Akcaoglu, M., Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Boyer, D. M. (2015). Policy, practice, and reality: Exploring a nation-wide technology implementation in Turkish schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.899264.
Akti Aslan, S., & Duruhan, K. (2018). Being counsellor of information technologies: Expectations and professional roles. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(4), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018038631.
Akti Aslan, S., & Duruhan, K. (2020). Problem based virtual learning: A conceptual analysis. Turkish Studies - Applied Sciences, 15(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.43251.
Alvarado, L. E., Aragón, R. R., & Bretones, F. D. (2020). Teachers’ attitudes towards the introduction of ICT in Ecuadorian public schools. TechTrends, 64(3), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00483-7.
Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2018). Starting teachers’ integration of ICT into their teaching practices in the lower secondary schools in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0431.
Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48(May 2015), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004.
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523.
Belay, M. T., Khatete, D. W., & Mugo, B. C. (2020). Teachers' attitude towards integrating ICT in classroom instruction in teaching and learning biology in secondary schools in the southern region, Eritrea. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(1), 1–18.
Chand, V. S., Deshmukh, K. S., & Shukla, A. (2020). Why does technology integration fail? Teacher beliefs and content developer assumptions in an Indian initiative. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2753–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09760-x.
Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105(February 2017), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005.
Chun, S. (2017). Birth and major strategies of smart education initiative in South Korea and its challenges. In International Conference on Smart Education and Smart E-Learning (pp. 439-449). Springer, Cham.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Daghan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). General trends of the studies about the sustainability of the technology usage in education: A thematic content analysis study. Education and Science, 40(178), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4175.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Deryakulu, D., & Olkun, S. (2009). Technology leadership and supervision: An analysis based on Turkish computer teachers' professional memories. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390802704055.
Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2019). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5.
Endres, M. L., & Chowdhury, S. (2019). Team and individual interactions with reciprocity in individual knowledge sharing. In effective knowledge management systems in modern society (pp. 123-145). IGI Global.
Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. J. (2018). A system’s view of e-learning success model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 16(1), 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12144.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th ed.). United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc..
Fuchs, C. (2008). The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(3), 291–309.
Getenet, S. T., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2016). Professionalizing in-service teachers’ focus on technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9306-4.
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68(March 2017), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057.
Goktas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study of 2005–2011. Computers & Education, 68, 211–222.
Gries, T., Grundmann, R., Palnau, I., & Redlin, M. (2017). Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies-a review of major concepts and findings. International Economics and Economic Policy, 14(2), 293–351.
Gurcan, F., & Ozyurt, O. (2020). Emerging trends and knowledge domains in E-learning researches: Topic modeling analysis with the articles published between 2008-2018. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(16), 738–756.
Haji, S. A., Moluayonge, G. E., & Park, I. (2017). Teachers’ use of information and communications technology in education: Cameroon secondary schools perspectives. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 147–153.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1–13.
Intel (2020). Australia Experiences a Digital Education Revolution. Retrieved from https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/case-studies/Ed-Transformation-CS-Australia-HiRes.pdf
Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The use of tablets distributed within the scope of FATIH project for education in Turkey (is FATIH project a fiasco or a technological revolution?). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030703.
ISTE. (2016). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students
Izmirli, O. S., & Kirmaci, O. (2017). New barriers to technology integration. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17(72), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.72.8.
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, N. H. (2016). The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Computers & Education, 95(April 2016), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004.
Kaleli-Yilmaz, G. (2015). The views of mathematics teachers on the factors affecting the integration of technology in mathematics courses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.8.
Karadeniz, S., & Hacifazlioglu, O. (2013). School Administrators Turning Dystopias into Utopias: Technology Stories From Low Socio-Economic Schools. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(28–1), 211–222.
Karalar, H., & Dogan, U. (2017). Teacher perception on educational informatics network: A qualitative study of a Turkish Anatolian high school. International Education Studies, 10(4), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n4p101.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). A survey to examine teachers’ perceptions of design dispositions, lesson design practices, and their relationships with technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.941280.
Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222.
Kula, A., & Deryakulu, D. (2017). Different subject teachers’ views, applications and suggestions about ICT integration in education. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.267187.
Kurt, S. (2014). Creating technology-enriched classrooms: Implementational challenges in Turkish education. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.776077.
Kuru Gönen, S. I. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: Reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974.
Lawrence, J., & Tar, U. (2013). The use of grounded theory technique as a practical tool for qualitative data collection and analysis. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 11(1), 29–40.
Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. In Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Malak, M. Z., Khalifeh, A. H., & Shuhaiber, A. H. (2017). Prevalence of internet addiction and associated risk factors in Jordanian school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 556–563.
Mascheroni, G., & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: Risks and opportunities.
Mishra, P. C., Kishore, S., & Shivani, S. (2018). The role of information technology for knowledge management: An empirical study of the Indian coal mining industry. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(3), 208–225.
Mulhim, E. (2013). The current use of ICT by novice female teachers in Saudi primary schools and their perceived training needs. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference (pp. 597–601). Retrieved from https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney13/about/proceedings.pdf
Munyengabe, S., Yiyi, Z., Haiyan, H., & Hitimana, S. (2017). Primary teachers’ perceptions on ICT integration for enhancing teaching and learning through the implementation of one laptop per child program in primary schools of Rwanda. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 7193–7204. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79044.
Paryono, P., & Quito, B. G. (2010). Meta-analysis of ICT integration in vocational and technical education in Southeast Asia. Seavern Journals, 2(1) Retrieved from https://bit.ly/378wekk.
Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers' perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x.
Rodríguez-Miranda, F. P., Pozuelos-Estrada, F. J., & León-Jariego, J. C. (2014). The role of ICT coordinator. Priority and time dedicated to professional functions. Computers & Education, 72(March 2014), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.009.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Sanli, C., Sezer, A., & Pinar, A. (2016). Perceptions of geography teachers to integrating technology to teaching and their practices. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 6(3), 234–252.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(January 2019), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009.
Sezer, B. (2011). Bilisim teknolojilerinin egitime kaynastirilmasi: Onem, engeller ve ulkemizde gerceklestirilen projeler [Integration of information technologies into education: importance, barriers and projects carried out in Turkey]. In 16th Internet Conference of Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326225245_Bilisim_Teknolojilerinin_Egitime_Kaynastirilmasi_Onem_Engeller_ve_Ulkemizde_Gerceklestirilen_Projeler
Sharts-Hopko, N. C. (2002). Assessing rigor in qualitative research. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 13(4), 84–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60374-9.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49–58.
Spiteri, M., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x.
Staneva, A., Bogossian, F., Pritchard, M., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). The effects of maternal depression, anxiety, and perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth: A systematic review. Women and Birth, 28(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.003.
Tarman, B., Baytak, A., & Duman, H. (2015). Teachers' views on an ICT reform in education for social justice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1445a.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45, 1–45,10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
Timur, B., Yilmaz, Ş, & Timur, S. (2016). Science and technology teachers’ views about FATIH Project. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(2), 287–300.
Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Prestridge, S., Albion, P., & Edirisinghe, S. (2016). Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 110–120.
Torgerson, C. J., & Elbourne, D. (2002). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of information and communication technology (ICT) on the teaching of spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00164.
Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2017). Towards a differentiated and domain-specific view of educational technology: An exploratory study of history teachers’ technology use. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12493.
Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x.
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x.
Wikan, G., & Molster, T. (2011). Norwegian secondary school teachers and ICT. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2010.543671.
Wikibooks (2020). One-to-One Laptop Schools/Portugal. Retrieved from https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/One-to-One_Laptop_Schools/Portugal
Williams-Miller, G. (2020). The use of information and communication technology (ICT) by preschool and kindergarten educators. Retrieved from https://source.sheridancollege.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=fahcs_student_capstones_hbecl
Yesilyurt, E., Ulas, A. H., & Akan, D. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and computer self-efficacy as predictors of attitude toward applying computer-supported education. Computers in Human Behavior, 64(November 2016), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.038.
Yıldırım, O., Kursun, E., & Goktas, Y. (2015). The factors affecting the quality of in-service training on information and communication technologies. Education and Science, 40(178), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4137.
Yukselir, C. (2017). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research about mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in foreign language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3053570.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Turgut, Y.E., Aslan, A. Factors affecting ICT integration in TURKISH education: a systematic review. Educ Inf Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10441-2
- ICT integration
- Technology integration