Exploring the effectiveness of a mobile writing application for supporting handwriting acquisition of students with dysgraphia


Handwriting is one of the most important essential skills for both literacy and beyond. However, some students have difficulty in writing. Dysgraphia, a disorder of written expression, is a condition where a student’s writing skills are below the level expected of their intelligence, age, and education. The main purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a mobile writing application for students with dysgraphia and to determine whether students’ writing skills improve after using this application. A mixed method design was employed. This study reveals: 1) the mobile writing application contributed to the acquisition of writing skills (letter formation, spelling, and words) for students with dysgraphia, 2) the percentage of students’ on-task duration were in a range of 80% and 100%. When students’ writing speed was examined session by session, there was an increase in them all. Students’ correct attempts increased session by session and the number of incorrect attempts decreased. Students’ line violation tended to decrease session by session.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47


  1. Akyol, H. (2005). Türkçe ilk okuma yazma öğretimi [Turkish first reading and writing teaching]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.

  2. APA. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th. ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

  3. APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Pub.

  4. Azimi, E., & Mousavipour, S. (2014). The effects of educational multimedia in dictation and its role in improving dysgraphia in students with dictation difficulty. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(4), 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, S. H., & Yu, N. Y. (2014). The effect of computer-assisted therapeutic practice for children with handwriting deficit: A comparison with the effect of the traditional sensorimotor approach. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(7), 1648–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, P., & Patel, D. R. (2015). Dysgraphia. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 8(1), 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czyzewski, A., Odya, P., Grabkowska, A., Grabkowski, M., & Kostek, B. (2009, August). Smart pen: new multimodal computer control tool for dyslexia therapy. Poster presented at the meeting of SIGGRAPH '09, USA.

  8. DuPaul, G. J., & Weyandt, L. L. (2006). School-based intervention for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on academic, social, and behavioural functioning. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53(2), 161–176.

  9. DuPaul, G. J., Ervin, R. A., Hook, C. L., & McGoey, K. E. (1998). Peer tutoring for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on classroom behavior and academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Engel-Yeger, B., Nagauker-Yanuv, L., & Rosenblum, S. (2009). Handwriting performance, self-reports, and perceived self-efficacy among children with dysgraphia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(2), 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erhardt, R. P., & Meade, V. (2005). Improving handwriting without teaching handwriting: The consultative clinical reasoning process. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52(3), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández-López, Á., Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M. J., Rodríguez-Almendros, M. L., & Martínez-Segura, M. J. (2013). Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education, 61, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gambrell, L. B., Wilson, R. M., & Gantt, W. N. (1981). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(6), 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giordano, D., & Maiorana, F. (2014). Addressing dysgraphia with a mobile, web-based software with interactive feedback. In: Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), 2014 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on, Spain, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2014.6864354.

  16. Giordano, D., & Maiorana, F. (2015). A Mobile web game approach for improving dysgraphia. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education-Volume 1 (pp. 328-333).

  17. Godwin, K. E., Almeda, M. V., Seltman, H., Kai, S., Skerbetz, M. D., Baker, R. S., & Fisher, A. V. (2016). Off-task behavior in elementary school children. Learning and Instruction, 44, 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamstra-Bletz, L., & Blöte, A. W. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(10), 689–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hopcan, S. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of a mobile writing application for supporting handwriting acquisition of students with dysgraphia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

  20. Hopcan, S., Tokel, T., Karasu, N., & Aykut, Ç. (2019). Design and development of a mobile writing application for students with dysgraphia. In A. Forkosh-Baruch & H. Meishar-Tal (Eds.), Mobile Technologies for Organizational Learning. IGI Global.

  21. Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kagohara, D. M., Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kodan, H. (2016). Yazma güçlüğü olan üçüncü sınıf öğrencisinin el yazısı okunaklılığının geliştirilmesi: Eylem araştırması [improving handwriting legibility of a third year student with writing difficulty: Action research]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2, 523–539.

    Google Scholar 

  24. MacArthur, C. A. (2009). Reflections on research on writing and technology for struggling writers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. MacInnis, C., & Hemming, H. (1995). Linking the needs of students with learning disabilities to a whole language curriculum. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(9), 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maeland, A. F., & Karlsdottir, R. (1991). Development of reading, spelling and writing skills from third to sixth grade in normal and dysgraphic school children. In J. Wann, A. M. Wing, & N. Sovik (Eds.), Development of graphic skills (pp. 179–184). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McHale, K., & Cermak, S. A. (1992). Fine motor activities in elementary school: Preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(10), 898–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MONE. (2005). İlköğretim Türkçe dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu [Elementary Turkish course curriculum and guide]. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Basımevi.

    Google Scholar 

  29. O’Connell, T., Freed, G., & Rothberg, M. (2010). Using apple technology to support learning for students with sensory and learning disabilities. Boston: Carl and Ruth Shapiro Family National Center for Accessible Media, WGBH Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Palluel-Germain, R., Bara, F., Hillairet de Boisferon, A., Hennion, B., Gouagout, P., & Gentaz, E. (2007). A Visuo-haptic device – Telemaque - increases kindergarten children’s handwriting acquisition. In: Proceedings of IEEE World Haptics 2007, Japan, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2007.13

  31. Parastar Feizabadi, M., Yazdchi, M., Ghoshuni, M., & Hashemian, P. (2013). A brief study on EEG signals of dysgraphia children in relaxing and writing moods. International Journal of Biomedical Research, 4(1), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Phelps, J., Stempel, L., & Speck, G. (1985). The children's handwriting scale: A new diagnostic tool. The Journal of Educational Research, 79(1), 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Reisman, J. E. (1993). Development and reliability of the research version of the Minessota handwriting test. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 13, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenblum, S., Weiss, P. L., & Parush, S. (2003). Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 41–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Şahin, A. (2012). Bitişik eğik yazı öğretiminde karşılaşılan problemler [Problems encountered in cursive italics teaching]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smits-Engelsman, B. C., & Van Galen, G. P. (1997). Dysgraphia in children: Lasting psychomotor deficiency or transient developmental delay? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 67(2), 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tanimoto, S., Thompson, R., Berninger, V. W., Nagy, W., & Abbott, R. D. (2015). Computerized writing and reading instruction for students in grades 4–9 with specific learning disabilities affecting written language. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 671–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. VandenBerg, N. L. (2001). The use of a weighted vest to increase on-task behavior in children with attention difficulties. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(6), 621–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yıldız, M. (2013). Yazma güçlüğü (disgrafi) olan bir ilkokul 2. Sınıf öğrencisinin el yazısı okunaklılığının geliştirilmesi: Eylem araştırması [Improving the handwriting legibility of an elementary school 2nd grade student with writing difficulties (dysgraphia): Action research]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6, 282–311.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yıldız, M., & Ateş, S. (2010). İlk okuma yazmayı farklı yöntemlerle öğrenen ilköğretim 3. Sınıf öğrencilerinin yazılarının okunaklılık ve yazım hataları bakımından karşılaştırılması [Comparison of the writings of 3rd grade primary school students who learned to read and write with different methods in terms of legibility and spelling]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(1), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yılmaz, B. (2014). Design of a mobile device application with handwriting recognition to make learning easy for students who have learning disabilities (unpublished master's thesis). Maltepe University, Istanbul.

  42. Zhang, Y. (2000). Technology and the writing skills of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 467–478.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Hopcan.

Ethics declarations

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper is based on corresponding author’s Ph.D. dissertation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hopcan, S., Tokel, S.T. Exploring the effectiveness of a mobile writing application for supporting handwriting acquisition of students with dysgraphia. Educ Inf Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10440-3

Download citation


  • Elementary education
  • Interactive learning environments
  • Handwriting
  • Dysgraphia
  • Gesture recognition