Effects of microworld game-based approach on neuromuscular disabled students learning performance in elementary basic science courses

Abstract

In conventional classroom driven instructor training, disabled student achieved low personality & motivation, more mental load due to lack of practical learning and unsuitable usage of learning material through different simulated contexts. Therefore, intent of proposed study is to integrate microworld game-based learning to different learning styles of special needs students which enhance their learning performance and encourage them to discover and solve problems they faced during classroom teaching. A quasi experimental design was implemented in the proposed SmartLearn system in natural science behavioral course to examine the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The experimental results showed that students who adopted microworld gaming-based system was able to reduce their cognitive load, enhance learning motivation skills to gain understanding on novel concepts, improve personality to foster interpersonal skills, self-efficacy and improvements in learning achievements in comparison to the conventional learning technology driven approach. The findings of this study provide good evidence for special needs children where association of practically applied learning scenarios with gaming contexts improve their performance which encourages development of such systems for learners suffered from Autism, Dyslexia, Dysgraphia. Alzheimer etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

References

  1. Bottino, R. M., & Robotti, E. (2007). Transforming classroom teaching & learning through technology: Analysis of a case study. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conti-Ramsden, G., Durkin, K., & Walker, A. (2010). Computer anxiety: A comparison of adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). Computers and Education, 56(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Helping students understand how they learn. The teaching professor, vol. 7 no. 4. Madison, Wisconsin: Magma Publications.

  5. Gaumer Erickson, A. S., Soukup, J. H., Noonan, P. M., & McGurn, L. (2016). Self-efficacy questionnaire. Lawrence: University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Stadler, M., & Wüstenberg, S. (2015). Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 356–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25(3), 167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x.

  9. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Chen, C. C., & Tu, N. T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on student’s learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Legault, L., & Green-Demers, I. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic a motivation and the role of social support. J Educ Psychol, 98, 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manolopulou-Sergi, E. (2004). Motivation within the information processing model of foreign language learning. System, 32(2), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinovic, D., Burgess, G. H., Pomerleau, C. M., & Marin, C. (2016). Computer games that exercise cognitive skills: What makes them engaging for children? Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Supp, 60(1), 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, C. S., Lehman, J. F., & Koedinger, K. R. (1999). Goals and learning in microworlds. Cognitive Science, 23(3), 305–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers, I. B., McCaulley Mary, H., Quenk, N. L., Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual (a guide to the development and use of the Myers Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press; pp. 131. ISBN 0-89106-130-4.

  19. Nicaud, J. F., Bouhineau, D., & Chaachoua, H. (2004). Mixing microworld and CAS features in building computer systems that help students learn algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(2), 169–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ronimus, M., Kujala, J., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2014). Children's engagement during digital game-based learning of reading: The effects of time, rewards, and challenge. Computers and Education, 71(1), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sarasubm, K. (1998). Learning style perspectives: Impact in the classroom. Kansas City: Atwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Squires, D., & McDougall, A. (1986). Computer-based microworlds – A definition to aid design. Computers & Education, 10(3), 375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stadler, M., Niepel, C., & Greiff, S. (2016). Easily too difficult: Estimating item difficulty in computer simulated microworlds. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported in part by the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) India under major project contract number 02/138/2017–18/RP/Major.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditya Khamparia.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Aditya declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Babita declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khamparia, A., Pandey, B. & Mishra, B.P. Effects of microworld game-based approach on neuromuscular disabled students learning performance in elementary basic science courses. Educ Inf Technol 25, 3881–3896 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10142-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Elementary education
  • Interactive learning environments
  • Teaching/learning strategies
  • Evaluation methodologies
  • Cooperative/collaborative learning
  • Microworld
  • Gaming
  • Personality
  • Motivation
  • Self-efficacy