Skip to main content
Log in

Can effective study approaches mediate the negative effect of social networking on academic performance?

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Connection and communication via social networking applications are now one of the most important features in college students’ lives. Text and graphical messaging and generating, sharing, and viewing visual messages may affect students’ academic life, especially their academic performance. In this regard, reports about the effect of social networking on academic performance have been inconsistent and also explanations for the possible causes of the negative effects of social networks have been incomplete. The current study focuses on this gap and investigates the role of social networking on the academic performance of students regarding the mediating role of study approaches by using descriptive-correlational research method and analyzing the data of 380 college students through the regression and mediation analysis. Findings revealed that social networking negatively affects academic performance. Moreover, we found that strategic study approach could not mediate the negative effect of social networking on academic performance. These findings were discussed and recommendations were presented for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedin, N. F. Z., Jaafar, Z., Husain, S., & Abdullah, R. (2013). The validity of ASSIST as a measurement of learning approach among MDAB students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwagait, E., Shahzad, B., & Alim, S. (2015). Impact of social media usage on students academic performance in Saudi Arabia. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellur, S., Nowak, K. L., & Hull, K. S. (2015). Make it our time: In class multitaskers have lower academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsaksen, T., Sadeghi, T., & Thørrisen, M. M. (2017). Associations between self-esteem, general self-efficacy, and approaches to studying in occupational therapy students: A cross-sectional study. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 33(4), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2017.1295006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., & Yan, Z. (2016). Does multitasking with mobile phones affect learning? A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheston, C. C., Flickinger, T. E., & Chisolm, M. S. (2013). Social media use in medical education: A systematic review. Academic Medicine, 88(6), 893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2005). Planning for neomillennial learning styles. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 7–12.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dindar, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2016). Effects of multitasking on retention and topic interest. Learning and Instruction, 41, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenti, H. N. (2012). Relationships of approaches to studying, metacognition, and intellectual development of general chemistry students. University of north texas.

  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London, UK: Croom Helm.

  • Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, K. S., Harrington, S. J., & Santiago, J. (2009). The effect of engagement and perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction: Longman publishing.

  • Gallardo-Echenique, E. E., Marqués-Molías, L., Bullen, M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2015). Let’s talk about digital learners in the digital era. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 156–187.

  • Hameed, Z., Maqbool, A., Aslam, N., Hassan, E. u., & Anwar, M. (2013). An empirical study to investigate the impact of social networking sites on student’s academic performance and attitude in case of Pakistan. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(6), 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanbeigi, A., Askari, J., Nakhjavani, M., Shirkhoda, S., Barzegar, K., Mozayyan, M. R., & Fallahzadeh, H. (2011). The relationship between study skills and academic performance of university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1416–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H.-T., & Yuen, S. C.-Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2010). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(5), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, E. P. W. A., & Suhre, C. J. M. (2010). The effect of secondary school study skills preparation on first-year university achievement. Educational Studies, 36(5), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055691003729070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking: The role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R. (2012a). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R. (2012b). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungert, T. (2008). A longitudinal study of engineering students’ approaches to their studies. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802183770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karin, B., Marina, K., Rolien, K., & Bernice, B. (2016). Factors influencing students’ learning approaches in auditing. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(3), 390–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2013-0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpinski, A. C., Kirschner, P. A., Ozer, I., Mellott, J. A., & Ochwo, P. (2013). An exploration of social networking site use, multitasking, and academic performance among United States and European university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, T., & Bicen, H. (2016). The effects of social media on students’ behaviors; Facebook as a case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 374–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutlu, M. O., & Korkmaz, Ş. (2014). Relationship between the high school students perspectives on study skills and the types of state high School in Terms of some variables. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1029–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Magogwe, J. M., Ntereke, B., & Phetlhe, K. R. (2015). Facebook and classroom group work: A trial study involving University of Botswana Advanced Oral Presentation students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1312–1323. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michikyan, M., Subrahmanyam, K., & Dennis, J. (2015). Facebook use and academic performance among college students: A mixed-methods study with a multi-ethnic sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B., Spada, M. M., & Rost, F. M. (2007). Approaches to studying when preparing for final exams as a function of coping strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nor, S. A. K., & Amelia, H. (2007). Reading habits and attitude in the digital age: Analysis of gender and academic program differences in Malaysia. The Electronic Library, 25(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710754805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogedebe, P., Emmanuel, J., & Musa, Y. (2012). A survey on Facebook and academic performance in Nigeria universities. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(4), 788–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M., & Cochran, J. D. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2117–2127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepe, K. (2012). Study skills of students studying at different departments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1040–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., Luo, Y. L., Yang, Z., Liu, Y., & Cai, H. (2014). The development and validation of the social network sites (SNSs) usage questionnaire. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media, The Development and Validation of the Social Network Sites (SNSs) Usage Questionnaire.

  • Spada, M. M., Nikcevic, A. V., Moneta, G. B., & Ireson, J. (2006). Metacognition as a mediator of the effect of test anxiety on a surface approach to studying. Educational Psychology, 26(5), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500390673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speth, C. A., Namuth, D. M., & Lee, D. J. (2007). Using the ASSIST short form for evaluating an information technology application: Validity and reliability issues. Informing Science (10), 107–119

  • Subrahmanyam, K., Michikyan, M., Clemmons, C., Carrillo, R., Uhls, Y. T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). Learning from paper, learning from screens: Impact of screen reading and multitasking conditions on reading and writing among college students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 3(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2013100101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tait, H., Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.), In Improving students as learners (pp. 262–271). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

  • Tarabashkina, L., & Lietz, P. (2011). The impact of values and learning approaches on student achievement: Gender and academic discipline influences. Issues in Educational Research, 21(2), 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valadas, S. C. A. T. S., Gonçalves, F. R., & Faísca, L. M. (2010). Approaches to studying in higher education Portuguese students: A Portuguese version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students. Higher Education, 59(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9246-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., Spronken-Smith, R., Bond, C., McDonald, F., Reynolds, J., & McMartin, A. (2010). The impact of curriculum change on health sciences first year students’ approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 38(6), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9092-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. L., Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Female college students’ media use and academic outcomes: Results from a longitudinal cohort study. Emerging Adulthood, 1(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Sadoski, M. (2011). Do study strategies predict academic performance in medical school? Medical Education, 45(7), 696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, A. Y., Tian, S. W., Vogel, D., & Chi-Wai Kwok, R. (2010). Can learning be virtually boosted? An investigation of online social networking impacts. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1494–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamamd Ali Rostaminezhad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rostaminezhad, M.A., Porshafei, H. & Ahamdi, A.A. Can effective study approaches mediate the negative effect of social networking on academic performance?. Educ Inf Technol 24, 205–217 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9770-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9770-y

Keywords

Navigation