Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of activity theory to guide information systems research

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Activity Theory (AT) is increasingly employed as a lens to guide data analysis in information systems (IS) studies. The theory is also applied to assess and evaluate information systems and technologies (IS/IT) in organisations. Even though its popularity continues to increase in both business and academic domains, there is no formal or assessment guide through which the theory can be applied, which makes it sometimes difficult or complicated. The challenge is significant and critical in that when applied, it influences and shapes the results of the phenomena being studied. This is a problem as results of studies cannot or should not be misconstrued or misrepresented. This study was undertaken to examine how the use of AT in IS studies can be made easy. Based on the findings, a three phase approach was developed and proposed, to guide: (i) the selection of AT in an IS/IT study; (ii) use of elements for data analysis; and (iii) how the elements can be linked with AT components in the analysis of qualitative data. The approach therefore provides a formal guide that can be followed, to ease the selection and application of AT in IS/IT studies as well as assessment of IS/IT artefacts in an organisation. The approach can be useful to researchers for data analysis and interpretation of results. Also, the guidelines can be employed by educators for teaching and learning in the areas of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D., Karanasios, S., & Slavova, M. (2011). Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 776–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008). Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, P., & Younker, B. A. (2008). Investigating children's musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: An application of Engeström's activity theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Sedano, C. I., Hauge, J. B., et al. (2015). An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Computers & Education, 87, 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, F. C. (2010). Evaluating research: Methodology for people who need to read research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Orienta-konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.

  • Engeström, Y., Lompscher, J., & Rückriem, G. (2016). Putting activity theory to work: Contributions from developmental work research (Vol. 13). In Lehmanns Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Er, M., Kay, R., & Lawrence, E. (2010). Information systems and activity theory: A case study of doctors and mobile knowledge work. In Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 12–14 April (pp. 603–607). Las Vegas, NV, USA. IEEE.

  • Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs. interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (Eds.). (2010). Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Cambridge University Press.

  • Holt, G., & Morris, A. (1993). Activity theory and the analysis of organizations. Human Organization, 52(1), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyamu, T. (2013). Underpinning theories: Order-of-use in information systems research. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 15(3), 222–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyamu, T. (2015). Application of underpinning theories in information systems, Heidelberg press. In Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B., & Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems (pp. 30–55). Springer: New York.

  • Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (1997). Activity theory: basic concepts and applications. In CHI'97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 158–159). ACM.

  • Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. In USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanasios, S., Allen, D., & Finnegan, P. (2015). Information systems journal special issue on: Activity theory in information systems research. Information Systems Journal, 25(3), 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leathwood, C., & Phillips, D. (2000). Developing curriculum evaluation research in higher education: Process. politics and practicalities. Higher Education, 40(3), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, H. (1999). An activity based perspective for information systems research. In 10th Australian Conference on Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moawad, N., Liu, K., & El-Helly, M. (2003). Integrating Activity Theory and Semiotics as Knowledge Elicitation Technique. 14 ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing. IEEE Computer Society.

  • Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. Qualitative research in information systems, 4, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Neto, G. C., Gomes, A. S., Castro, J., & Sampaio, S. (2005, October). Integrating activity theory and organizational modeling for context of use analysis. In Proceedings of the 2005 Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 301–306). ACM Press, New York.

  • O'donoghue, T. (2006). Planning your qualitative research project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education. Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, D. E. (2010). Enterprise ontologies: Review and an activity theory approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(4), 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Ayala, A., Sossa, H., & Méndez, I. (2014). Activity theory as a framework for building adaptive e-learning systems: A case to provide empirical evidence. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M. (2004). INTRODUCTION:" activity theory and education: An introduction". Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J., Jones, R., Vassiliou, M., & Hanna, S. (2012). Using card-based games to enhance the value of semi-structured interviews. International Journal of Market Research, 54(1), 93–110.

  • Sekgweleo, T., Makovhololo, P., & Iyamu, T. (2017). The connectedness in selecting socio-technical theory to underpin information systems studies. Journal of Contemporary Management, 14(1), 1097–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook (4th? Ed.). London, Great Britain: Sage.

  • Shaanika, I., & Iyamu, T. (2015). Deployment of enterprise architecture in the Namibian government: The use of activity theory to examine the influencing factors. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 71(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P., & Urquhart, C. (2013). Qualitative interpretative categorisation for efficient data analysis in a mixed methods information behaviour study. Information Research, 18(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, D. (2011). The role of ICT actors and networks in development: The case study of a wireless project in Nepal. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 49(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. International Journal Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamgata-Lynch, L.C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. London: Springer Science.

  • Yunos, Z., & Ahmad, R. (2014, February). The application of qualitative method in developing a cyber terrorism Framework In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Economics, Management and Development (EMD 2014) (pp. 133–137). 22–24 February. Interlaken, Switzerland.

  • Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 479–493.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa

    Tiko Iyamu & Irja Shaanika

Authors
  1. Tiko Iyamu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irja Shaanika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiko Iyamu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iyamu, T., Shaanika, I. The use of activity theory to guide information systems research. Educ Inf Technol 24, 165–180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9764-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9764-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation