Advertisement

Intergenerational gaps in digital understanding and skills in Palestinian society in Israel

Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The research dealt with intergenerational gaps in the use of digital technology in Palestinian society in Israel and its influence on relations between parents and their children. 120 parents from the center of the country participated in the study and one of the children (male or female) from each couple. Findings indicate the existence of inter-generational gaps in the ways in which the Internet is used between parents and children. Additionally, there are differences in the users’ self-perception of their technological capabilities; adults attribute greater familiarity with the Internet to children, while they are not amenable to and have negative consideration towards the Internet in contrast to the children’s views. This gap causes intergenerational tension harming the parents’ authority and consequently stimulating parents’ attempts to supervise the children’s use of the Internet. The children see the Internet as an intimate space for activity relatively free from parental supervision.

Keywords

Digital gaps Internet Intergenerational gaps Arab citizens in Israel 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author hereby declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abu-Asbah, K. (2007). The Arab Educational System in Israel: Dilemmas of a National Minority. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Research. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Asbah, K. (2012). Education for Values in a Society in Crisis. Jatt: Masar Institute for Research. [Arabic].Google Scholar
  3. Abu-Rabia-Queder, S. (2006). Between tradition and modernization: understanding the problem of Bedouin female dropout. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abu-Saad, I. (2005). Education and identity formation among indigenous Palestinian Arab youth in Israel. In Duane Champagne & Ismael AbuSaad (Eds.). Indigenous and minority education (pp. 235-256). Beer Sheva : Negev Centre for Regional Development.Google Scholar
  5. 'Ali, N., & Da’as, R. (2016). Arab women in Israeli politics: Aspirations for fundamental equality or preservation of gender inequality. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(2), 67–86.Google Scholar
  6. 'Ali, N. & Da'as, R. (2017). Exploring the Relationship between Gender and Acceptance of Authority at an Arab School in Israel. 18(2), 89.Google Scholar
  7. 'Ali, N. & Da'as, R. (2018, forthcoming). Higher education among the Arab minority in Israel: representation, mapping, barriers and challenges. Resling publishing and Ruth Dorot. [In Hebrew].Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, Janna, & Rainie, L. (2012). Millennials will benefit and suffer due to their hyperconnected lives. Pew research center. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/02/29/millennials-will-benefit-and-suffer-due-to-their-hyperconnected-lives/
  9. Aphek, E. (2001). Children of the information age: A reversal of roles. Ubiquity Magazine and Forum. Retrieved 7/8/10 from http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/e_aphek_3.html
  10. Arar, K., Shapira, T. Azaiza, F. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2013) Arab women in management and leadership. US: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Bailey, A., & Ngwenyama, O. (2010). Bridging the generation gap in ICT use: Interrogating identity, technology and interactions in community Telecenters. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belch, M. A., Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Teen internet mavens: Influence in family decision-making. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boniel-Nissim, M., & Barak, A. (2009). Pre-ana: 'Unidentified' girls in cyber-space. Encounter for Educational-Social Work, 29, 171–192 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  14. Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth love social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In David Buckingham (Ed.). Youth, identity, and digital Media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Series on Digital Media and Learning and The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Buckingham, D. (2000). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic Media Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Buckingham, D. (2006). Is There a Digital Generation?. In D. Buckingham and R. Willett (Eds.), Digital Generations Mahwah: Erlbaum. pp. 93–113.Google Scholar
  17. Buckingham, D. (2008). Introducing Identity In David Buckingham (Ed.). Youth, identity, and digital Media (pp. 1–24). The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Carrie, D. (6th May, 2014) Is technology helping families communicate or holding them back? The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/06/technology-helping-families-communicate-or-holding-back
  19. Chaudron, S., Beutel, M. E., Donoso Navarrete, V., Dreier, M., Fletcher-Watson, B., Heikkilä, A. S., … & Mascheroni, G. (2015). Young Children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. retrived from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/480577/1/Full_multi-national_report_2015.pdf
  20. Clark, L. S. (2009). Digital media and the generation gap: Qualitative research on U.S. teens and their parents. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Hilton san Francisco, San Francisco. Retrieved 07/08/2010 from: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p308581_index.html
  21. Clark, L. S., Demont Heinrich, C., & Webber, S. (2005). Parents, ICTs, and children’s prospects for success: Interviews along the digital “access rainbow”. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 22(5), 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Common Sense Census (2016). Media use by tweens & teens. Retrieved from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/census_executivesummary.pdf
  23. Correa, T. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1095–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Da'as, R. (2017). School principals’ leadership skills: Measurement equivalence across cultures. Compare: A journal of comparative and international education. Compare, 47(7), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, K., Weigel, M., James, C & Gardner, H. (2009). Social development in the era of new digital media. Good Work Paper 60. Retrieved from: http://pzweb.harvard.edu/eBookstore/PDFs/GoodWork60.pdf
  26. Dennis, J. M., Phinney, J. S., & Chuateco, L. I. (2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dholakia, R. R., Dholakia, D., & Kshetri, N. (2003). Gender and internet usage. In H. Bidgoli (Ed.), The internet encyclopedia. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Social media update 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved September 11, 2013, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
  29. Gauntlett, D. (2013), ‘Creativity and digital innovation’, in Gillian Youngs, editor, Digital World: Connectivity, Creativity and Rights, Abingdon: Routledge. Available at http://davidgauntlett.com/complete-list-of-publications/
  30. Ghanem, A. (2001). The Palestinian- Arab Minority in Israel, 1948–2000. A Political Study. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jewish Virtual Library (2018). Vital statistics: Latest population statistics for Israel. Retrieved from: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/latest-population-statistics-for-israel
  32. Johnson, M. S., & Kardos, S. M. (2005). Bridging the generation gap. Educational Leadership, 62(8), 8–14.Google Scholar
  33. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California. Retrieved: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf
  34. Lemish, D. (2010). The family and its images in the communication media: Close and distant relations. In V. Milbauer & L. Kliack (Eds.) Working families in Israel. (pp. 115-189). Tel Aviv: Peles and the economic society ltd. of the academic management college. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
  35. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media and technology overview 2015. Pew research center internet site. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  36. Livingstone, S. (2004). Young people and new Media London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2006). Regulating the Internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents|. In D. Buckingham & R. Willett (Eds.), Digital generations (pp. 93–113). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Livingstone, S., & Byrne, J. (2017) Challenges of parental responsibility in the digital age: A global perspective. UNICEF. Retrieved from: https://blogs.unicef.org/evidence-for-action/challenges-of-parental-responsibility-in-the-digital-age-a-global-perspective/
  39. Moctezuma, M. S. P., Ochoa, M. A. V., & Ramírez, M. S. M. (2017). Net generation features that enhance mobile learning. In Blended Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 2169–2195). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  40. Nielsen Company (2009). How teens use media: A Nielsen report on the myths and realities of teen media trends. Retrieved: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/reports/nielsen_howteensusemedia_june09.pdf
  41. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps toward understanding the net generation. In D. G. Oblinger and J. L. Oblinger (Eds.). Educating the net generation. 2.1–2.20. Washington, DC: Educause. Rertieved from: http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
  42. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II. Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6).Google Scholar
  43. Shifflet-Chila, E. D., Harold, R. D., Fitton, V. A., & Ahmedani, B. K. (2016). Adolescent and family development: Autonomy and identity in the digital age. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 364–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Teo, T., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., & Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2016). Exploring the digital natives among pre-service teachers in Turkey: A cross-cultural validation of the digital native assessment scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1231–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Totry, M. (2008). Leadership and Arab society in Israel. In. Abu-Asbah, K., Avishai, L. (Eds.). Recommendations for the development of effective leadership in Arab society in Israel (pp.13–20). Jerusalem: The Van Leer Institute.Google Scholar
  46. van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Venter, E. (2017). Bridging the communication gap between generation Y and the baby boomer generation. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 497–507.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang, X., Zhu, L., Chen, Q., Song, P., & Wang, Z. (2016). Parent marital conflict and internet addiction among Chinese college students: The mediating role of father-child, motherchild, and peer attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang, H., Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., Luo, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). Young adults' internet addiction: Prediction by the interaction of parental marital conflict and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 120, 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Al-Qasemi Academic College of EducationBaqa al-GharbiyyeIsrael

Personalised recommendations